Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 09:40:26 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 subscribe - -- Thank you, Dan Swanson Systems Engineer AdJuggler, Inc. o) 703 914 9700 f) 703 642 01 Jul 2010 05:33:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/24098 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, The IANA IPv4 registry has been updated to reflect the allocation of two /8 IPv4 blocks to APNIC i 29 May 2008 04:57:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/14317 This message has been sent to several lists. I apologise for duplicates. IANA has improved the format for the IPv4 Address Space registry. At the sam 21 Feb 2008 12:25:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/13219 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The IANA IPv4 registry has been updated to reflect the allocation of two /8 IPv4 blocks to ARIN in Febr 14 Feb 2008 11:22:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/13149 On 29 Oct 2007, at 16:44, Leo Vegoda wrote: > The IANA IPv4 registry has been updated to reflect the allocation of > two /8 IPv4 blocks to APNIC in O 29 Oct 2007 08:16:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/43 Hi, The IANA IPv4 registry has been updated to reflect the allocation of two /8 IPv4 blocks to APNIC in October 2007: 144/8 and 115/8. You can fi 29 Oct 2007 07:44:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/42 Hi, The IANA IPv4 registry has been updated to reflect the allocation of two /8 IPv4 blocks to LACNIC in September 2007: 186/8 and 187/8. You can 01 Oct 2007 01:30:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/41 this could use a bit more explanation of what you are actually diagnosing and how to read it. randy 21 Aug 2007 11:46:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/40 I'm releasing this for semi-public beta. http://puck.nether.net/bgp/leakinfo.cgi This detects routing leaks from major networks or t 21 Aug 2007 11:24:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/39 [Apologies for duplicate mails] Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC received the IPv6 address range 2a00::/12 from the IANA in October 2006. This alloca 18 Oct 2006 01:21:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/38 Dear Colleagues, Following a request, this announcement is being sent to a few ops focused mailing lists. We are pleased to announce that we will be 26 Sep 2006 01:42:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/37 On 31 Aug 2006, at 10:52GMT+02:00, leo vegoda wrote: > [Apologies for duplicate mails] > > Dear Colleagues, > > The RIPE NCC received the IPv4 addres 31 Aug 2006 01:00:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/36 [Apologies for duplicate mails] Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC received the IPv4 address ranges 77.0.0.0/8 and 78.0.0.0/7 from the IANA in August 200 31 Aug 2006 00:52:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/35 >> if it's useful, i'd be happy to report what percentage of my peers >> have/don't have routes to these prefixes. route-views and ris provide pretty 20 Sep 2005 17:27:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/34 > Connectivity testing is currently being done by Team Cymru on the following > three /20s (one from each /8). All of these test allocations originat 20 Sep 2005 16:37:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/33 Dear Colleagues, This announcement is being sent to multiple lists. I apologise for duplicates. The RIPE NCC received the IPv4 address range 89.0. 02 Aug 2005 05:17:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/32 >> better analysis will be available in a week. > Never one to grump at free & meaningful info, I didn't beat > the drum on the 'week' marker. Just w 01 May 2005 13:15:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/31 On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:02:38AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: [snip] > *extremely* initial results, which have now known but minor > errors, were presen 01 May 2005 09:08:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/30 Dear Colleagues, This announcement is being sent to multiple lists. I apologise for duplicates. The RIPE NCC received the IPv4 address range 85.0.0 20 Apr 2005 15:06:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/29 > Any news on this? *extremely* initial results, which have now known but minor errors, were presented at apnic. see <http://rip.psg.com/~randy/0 09 Mar 2005 15:02:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/28 if you receive a route with an optional transitive path attribute that you do not understand, do all significant vendors follow route redistribution r 05 Jan 2005 02:18:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/27 > By the way, has there been any initial data from the near-month of > data being collected by users of > http://rip.psg.com/~randy/anycast_gathere 16 Dec 2004 00:36:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/26 By the way, has there been any initial data from the near-month of data being collected by users of http://rip.psg.com/~randy/anycast_gatherer-1.4. 15 Dec 2004 23:50:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/25 On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 07:32:11AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote: [snip] > > ...so many times the analysis comes back to "accept everything > > and only re 15 Dec 2004 22:28:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/24 > I'm in boston this week and have been yapping on cells all day in the dc > area. >> smb asks via cell if qwest is having problems in the dc area? 14 Dec 2004 13:32:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/23 smb asks via cell if qwest is having problems in the dc area? randy 14 Dec 2004 12:12:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/22 > Part of 'what action should i take' also falls under 'what > is least effort'. MD pointed on that other list to the > CAIDA Atoms work [[url]htt 14 Dec 2004 10:32:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/21 On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 06:45:57AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote: [snip] > a hardcore <bleep> such as i might just filter them all > > a friendlier 14 Dec 2004 10:14:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/20 >> i proposed to rodney today, there are three types of prefix >> pollution. >> o pure crap, such as that we see on top of the weekly >> report 14 Dec 2004 09:46:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/19 On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Randy Bush wrote: > the real question is what can effectively be done to get > clueless crap out of the routing tables. The des 14 Dec 2004 07:59:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/18 On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Michael.Dillon@radianz.com wrote: > However, I think that the problem of pollution arises > from people's behavior and there are 14 Dec 2004 07:47:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/17 On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:58:14AM +0000, Michael.Dillon@radianz.com wrote: [snip] > The big task is going to be identifying the > traffic engineering 14 Dec 2004 06:27:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/16 I generally agree with Randy's viewpoint on this. However, I think that the problem of pollution arises from people's behavior and there are some soci 14 Dec 2004 05:57:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/15 On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:09:15PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:43:46PM -0500, Joe Provo wrote: > > Jeared, Geoff, et al, > 14 Dec 2004 03:16:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/14 as folk are censored by an fool from another non-ops-run list, having this as one place to discuss the cidr and ris reports would be good. the real q 13 Dec 2004 23:23:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/13 On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:43:46PM -0500, Joe Provo wrote: > Jeared, Geoff, et al, Not sure who the Jeared person is, but speaking as a Jared 13 Dec 2004 23:09:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/12 On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Joe Provo wrote: > Maybe the cidr report should get distribution here > for actual discussion of the data? I think thats a great 13 Dec 2004 14:15:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/11 Jeared, Geoff, et al, Maybe the cidr report should get distribution here for actual discussion of the data? I got several private replies indicati 13 Dec 2004 13:43:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/10 On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 06:39 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote: > Hi, > ? > I see some spam e-mails delivered?to my customers via my MX which i 16 Oct 2003 10:40:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/8 Hi, I see some spam e-mails delivered to my customers via my MX which is a backup for them... it seems that for some reason, they trust me more than 16 Oct 2003 07:42:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/7 ignore. test of new list software. -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.net 11 Dec 2002 01:00:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/2 I'm looking for a suggestion for cheap route-servers. Preferably something in the 1-3U size range. I need to be able to take at least 4 full BGP vie 10 Dec 2002 10:32:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/inet/1