
bdflemin at gmail
Oct 29, 2010, 6:55 AM
Post #2 of 2
(711 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: BigIron RX LAG load sharing behaviour
[In reply to]
|
|
I don't believe there's a way to reconfigure the BigIron; however, you'll likely get even load balancing if you can create two separate sessions / flows. Is that possible in your situation? On Oct 29, 2010, at 3:40 AM, Dana wrote: > Hi all, > > I have noticed a little problem with our LAG configurations in our > Bigiron RXes. The problem description is as follows: > > We have configured a LAG of two or more ports. From time to time we > are getting a high utilization port message from our monitoring > system on one of the two/more ports in that LAG. Thus, it seems that > the software does not share the traffic evenly amongst the available > ports. > > After reading the manual, I understand that there is no way we can > manipulate the load-sharing method of our LAGs. BigIron RXes only > load-share using HASH-BASED method. Although Foundry/Brocade claims > that this method should do the job properly, it is not the case in > our network. Let me give you some lines to show the problem: > > lag "trunk-1" static > ports e 2/7 to 2/8 > primary-port 2/7 > deploy > > #sh int e 2/7 | i util > 300 second input rate: 155247818 bits/sec, 39455 packets/sec, > 15.90% utilization > 300 second output rate: 25029300 bits/sec, 11300 packets/sec, 2.61% > utilization > > sh int e 2/8 | i util > 300 second input rate: 189413832 bits/sec, 44085 packets/sec, > 19.36% utilization > 300 second output rate: 482937687 bits/sec, 79502 packets/sec, > 49.05% utilization > > As you can see above, the output rate (from BIRX to an FWSX) has a > ratio of 49% vs 2%. However, if you look at the input rate (from > FWSX to BIRX), it has more or less the same amount of traffic 19% vs > 15%. > > My question is now, is there anyway we can do in the BIRX to get the > two ports more balanced? I hope some of you has experienced the > same problem and could share the solution/trick with me. > > Thanks in advance. > > > -- > Dana > > > _______________________________________________ > foundry-nsp mailing list > foundry-nsp [at] puck > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp [at] puck http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
|