Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 11:35:10 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On 2/9/2012 7:08 AM, James Paussa wrote: > I was wondering what everyone's workarounds were to achieve binding a > VLL to a LSP, essentially the equiv 09 Feb 2012 06:03:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33367 I was wondering what everyone's workarounds were to achieve binding a VLL to a LSP, essentially the equivalent of: vpls-peer <ip-address> lsp <lsp1 09 Feb 2012 05:08:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33361 I'm not sure I would rely on a config parser to provide me with a security audit in any case. On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Subba Rao <umroute@tanu 09 Feb 2012 01:34:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33358 Hi, We have a few Foundry Routers and Switches which will be audited soon. In the past I have used Nipper when it was free to assess Cisco network eq 08 Feb 2012 08:46:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33347 schrieb Nick Gray: > The hand off is Ethernet. Appears to be handing off to two netgear > smart switches linked together ( 'switch1' and 'switch2' ) o 07 Feb 2012 14:16:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33329 Thanks for the input! I will not know for sure if this will work until the client comes in later in the week. Cheers! -Nick On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3 07 Feb 2012 13:50:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33327 The customer might have some kind of loop in their network and when you shut down one interface, it allowed the loop to clear. I don't see anything w 07 Feb 2012 12:17:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33326 The hand off is Ethernet. Appears to be handing off to two netgear smart switches linked together ( 'switch1' and 'switch2' ) on the client's side. Th 07 Feb 2012 11:33:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33325 Well, is the circuit delivered over Ethernet? They might have both ports plugged into a switch on their side that is doing something goofy. On Tue 07 Feb 2012 11:10:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33324 'vlan123' is independent on either router but I can change it if necessary. I had a feeling the client's side was having issues which is why I was thr 07 Feb 2012 11:07:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33323 > I had a sneaking feeling it wasn't that easy though. One of the router > interfaces had to be shut down before traffic properly forwarded to > and f 07 Feb 2012 10:52:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33322 Greetings, This may be a trivial situation, but I am having a little bit of an issue with redundant connections for a client. Here is the setup: = ro 07 Feb 2012 09:49:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33321 Hi Think we had something similar but it occurred when Microsoft rolled out a TLS 1.0 patch. WE were running 10.2.1q and although every other browser 06 Feb 2012 03:21:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33311 Hello colleagues, since Mozilla started to release Firefox 10 on January 31st we are seeing some issues with SSL terminated websites on SI Platform 06 Feb 2012 01:03:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33310 I'd be happy if Brocade even learned to support ECN. On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Fabio Mendes <fabio.mendes@bsd.com.br> wrote: > PfR goes beyond 04 Feb 2012 11:06:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33293 PfR goes beyond congestion. QoS configs are static and they denpend on the path chosen by the routing protocol. If the path has a considereable delay 04 Feb 2012 09:31:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33292 That's pretty much a Cisco proprietary feature, not something that is standard to any routing protocol. Basically, it is so you can send your money t 04 Feb 2012 09:16:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33291 David, there have been SEVERAL NAT fixes looking at the release notes for 10.2.x. I would upgrade anyway. Also, there may be other fixes in the code 03 Feb 2012 19:06:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33288 On Feb 3, 2012, at 9:27 PM, George B. wrote: > Also there was another feature added in 10.2.0i > > "Module: WSM6, WSM7, WSM6-SSL, SI-4G and SI-4G-SS 03 Feb 2012 18:52:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33287 On Feb 3, 2012, at 9:12 PM, George B. wrote: Hi George; Thanks for responding! > There have been some changes in the serveriron NAT code since 10. 03 Feb 2012 18:48:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33286 Also there was another feature added in 10.2.0i "Module: WSM6, WSM7, WSM6-SSL, SI-4G and SI-4G-SSL Symptom: Feature enhancement to disable client-ip 03 Feb 2012 18:27:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33285 Looks like the issues that were fixed for me were fixed in 10.2.01p of the 4GL code. I would take it to the end of 10.2 if I were you if you don't wa 03 Feb 2012 18:20:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33284 There have been some changes in the serveriron NAT code since 10.2.01, I would upgrade first. Is access-list 199 your ONLY list? Does it ONLY have ho 03 Feb 2012 18:12:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33283 Hello colleagues, I have a BI4000 (J-BxGMR4) running on 08.0.01w that sometimes loses a few lines of the running-config. This usually happens whe 03 Feb 2012 13:33:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33282 All; I have a ServerIron 4G SSL with Version 10.2.01oTI4 on it. Other than very infrequently dropping the ability to ssh to it it's been extremely r 31 Jan 2012 12:02:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33258