Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 18:26:03 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On 2/9/2012 7:08 AM, James Paussa wrote: > I was wondering what everyone's workarounds were to achieve binding a > VLL to a LSP, essentially the equiv 09 Feb 2012 06:03:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33367 I was wondering what everyone's workarounds were to achieve binding a VLL to a LSP, essentially the equivalent of: vpls-peer <ip-address> lsp <lsp1 09 Feb 2012 05:08:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33361 I'm not sure I would rely on a config parser to provide me with a security audit in any case. On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Subba Rao <umroute@tanu 09 Feb 2012 01:34:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33358 Hi, We have a few Foundry Routers and Switches which will be audited soon. In the past I have used Nipper when it was free to assess Cisco network eq 08 Feb 2012 08:46:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33347 schrieb Nick Gray: > The hand off is Ethernet. Appears to be handing off to two netgear > smart switches linked together ( 'switch1' and 'switch2' ) o 07 Feb 2012 14:16:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33329 Thanks for the input! I will not know for sure if this will work until the client comes in later in the week. Cheers! -Nick On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3 07 Feb 2012 13:50:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33327 The customer might have some kind of loop in their network and when you shut down one interface, it allowed the loop to clear. I don't see anything w 07 Feb 2012 12:17:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33326 The hand off is Ethernet. Appears to be handing off to two netgear smart switches linked together ( 'switch1' and 'switch2' ) on the client's side. Th 07 Feb 2012 11:33:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33325 Well, is the circuit delivered over Ethernet? They might have both ports plugged into a switch on their side that is doing something goofy. On Tue 07 Feb 2012 11:10:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33324 'vlan123' is independent on either router but I can change it if necessary. I had a feeling the client's side was having issues which is why I was thr 07 Feb 2012 11:07:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33323 > I had a sneaking feeling it wasn't that easy though. One of the router > interfaces had to be shut down before traffic properly forwarded to > and f 07 Feb 2012 10:52:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33322 Greetings, This may be a trivial situation, but I am having a little bit of an issue with redundant connections for a client. Here is the setup: = ro 07 Feb 2012 09:49:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33321 Hi Think we had something similar but it occurred when Microsoft rolled out a TLS 1.0 patch. WE were running 10.2.1q and although every other browser 06 Feb 2012 03:21:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33311 Hello colleagues, since Mozilla started to release Firefox 10 on January 31st we are seeing some issues with SSL terminated websites on SI Platform 06 Feb 2012 01:03:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33310 I'd be happy if Brocade even learned to support ECN. On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Fabio Mendes <fabio.mendes@bsd.com.br> wrote: > PfR goes beyond 04 Feb 2012 11:06:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33293 PfR goes beyond congestion. QoS configs are static and they denpend on the path chosen by the routing protocol. If the path has a considereable delay 04 Feb 2012 09:31:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33292 That's pretty much a Cisco proprietary feature, not something that is standard to any routing protocol. Basically, it is so you can send your money t 04 Feb 2012 09:16:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33291 David, there have been SEVERAL NAT fixes looking at the release notes for 10.2.x. I would upgrade anyway. Also, there may be other fixes in the code 03 Feb 2012 19:06:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33288 On Feb 3, 2012, at 9:27 PM, George B. wrote: > Also there was another feature added in 10.2.0i > > "Module: WSM6, WSM7, WSM6-SSL, SI-4G and SI-4G-SS 03 Feb 2012 18:52:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33287 On Feb 3, 2012, at 9:12 PM, George B. wrote: Hi George; Thanks for responding! > There have been some changes in the serveriron NAT code since 10. 03 Feb 2012 18:48:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33286 Also there was another feature added in 10.2.0i "Module: WSM6, WSM7, WSM6-SSL, SI-4G and SI-4G-SSL Symptom: Feature enhancement to disable client-ip 03 Feb 2012 18:27:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33285 Looks like the issues that were fixed for me were fixed in 10.2.01p of the 4GL code. I would take it to the end of 10.2 if I were you if you don't wa 03 Feb 2012 18:20:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33284 There have been some changes in the serveriron NAT code since 10.2.01, I would upgrade first. Is access-list 199 your ONLY list? Does it ONLY have ho 03 Feb 2012 18:12:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33283 Hello colleagues, I have a BI4000 (J-BxGMR4) running on 08.0.01w that sometimes loses a few lines of the running-config. This usually happens whe 03 Feb 2012 13:33:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33282 All; I have a ServerIron 4G SSL with Version 10.2.01oTI4 on it. Other than very infrequently dropping the ability to ssh to it it's been extremely r 31 Jan 2012 12:02:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33258 On 24/01/12 16:52, Frank Bulk wrote: > I also added code to deal with a situation where the CPU percentage > was calculated to be over 100%. > > if(( 26 Jan 2012 08:45:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33183 Thanks Lutz (and for the additional notes from Jethro). I've incorporated those changes now. - Barry > On 24/01/12 15:48, Lutz Knabenreich wrote: 26 Jan 2012 08:45:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33184 There is an GIEI (Global I2C Error Indicator) flag that is set when there is an I2C failure. Is that accessible via SNMP, and if so, what is the OID? 25 Jan 2012 12:42:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33170 Barry: I also added code to deal with a situation where the CPU percentage was calculated to be over 100%. if(( $util >= $threscpu{$t_time 24 Jan 2012 08:52:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33153 On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Lutz Knabenreich wrote: > As far as I know the OID output is 0.5 Degrees Celsius each unit and not > Fahrenheit, means OID Valu 24 Jan 2012 08:47:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33152 Barry, Am 17.01.2012 08:31, schrieb Barry O'Donovan: > > On 16/01/12 22:45, Frank Bulk wrote: >> If you use NAGIOS, it would be interesting to find o 24 Jan 2012 07:48:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33151 If I do a 'show server' on our ADX 1008 it shows a very interesting statistic near the bottom which is: last conn rate = xxxx I have bee 20 Jan 2012 05:23:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33091 Thanks, it seems to work fine on my MLXe. I hadn't seen your NAGIOS plugin in my previous searches. If you haven't already, please add it to NAGIOS 17 Jan 2012 06:18:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33015 On 16/01/12 22:45, Frank Bulk wrote: > If you use NAGIOS, it would be interesting to find out if the > check_snmp_environment plugin identifies that i 16 Jan 2012 23:31:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33009 If you use NAGIOS, it would be interesting to find out if the check_snmp_environment plugin identifies that issue. Frank -----Original Message----- 16 Jan 2012 14:45:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33002 On 16/01/2012 22:01, Robert Hass wrote: > Is any SNMP OID in TurboIron (SW 4.2 or 7.3 - doesn't matter) to > monitor status of power supply ? > We had 16 Jan 2012 14:33:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33001 Hi Is any SNMP OID in TurboIron (SW 4.2 or 7.3 - doesn't matter) to monitor status of power supply ? We had problem with one power supply (lost power 16 Jan 2012 14:01:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32997 > Hello, > > > after changing to static cam mode CPU utilization is indeed back to normal. > > I was under the impression that dynamic cam mode wou 12 Jan 2012 04:06:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32948 Am 11.01.12 14:28, schrieb Dunc: >> >> I have high CPU utilization on the first line card. >> My impression is that this is related to cam memory exha 12 Jan 2012 03:28:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32947 > I have a CAM related question: > > Currently I am running on this MLX: > > cam-partition profile multi-service-2 > cam-partition logging 90% 30 > 11 Jan 2012 05:28:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32932 Am 17.12.11 13:47, schrieb Valeri Streltsov: > Hi > > CAM profile are affecting to IPv4, IPv6, ACL(v4&v6), vrf, mpls sizes of > allocated partitions 11 Jan 2012 05:16:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32931 Hi I just configurint Police+Shape for customer at FESX624 Gigabit port for 150Mbps: #sh run int e6 interface ethernet 6 load-interval 30 rate-limi 28 Dec 2011 01:19:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32753 I don't have a clear picture of your network design, but can the firewalls pass keepalives transparently between switches on either side? On Thu, Dec 22 Dec 2011 12:10:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32691 I have transparent bridges (fw) without spt and the problem is not with switches redundancy where we already can use mct like solutions (two fcx stack 22 Dec 2011 11:39:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32690 You can use UDLD with protected link groups on Brocade equipment to provide similar functionality to LACP keepalives. Also, have you considered confi 22 Dec 2011 07:06:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32685 On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Eric Helm <helmwork@ruraltel.net> wrote: > Yes... they call the feature "Protected Link Groups" Thanks Eric. Unfor 22 Dec 2011 04:50:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32684 On 21/12/2011 18:01, Raja Subramanian wrote: > We have a large campus LAN with +150 FI switches in a traditional 3 tier > design with edge and aggrega 21 Dec 2011 10:11:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32669 Sorry for the double post! - Raja On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Raja Subramanian <rajasuperman@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3: 21 Dec 2011 10:02:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32668 On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Eric Helm <helmwork@ruraltel.net> wrote: > Yes... they call the feature "Protected Link Groups" We have a large camp 21 Dec 2011 10:01:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32667 On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Eric Helm <helmwork@ruraltel.net> wrote: > Yes... they call the feature "Protected Link Groups" We have a large camp 21 Dec 2011 09:59:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32666 On 2011-12-19 15:27, Niels Bakker wrote: > * r.bhatia@ipax.at (Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]) [Sat 17 Dec 2011, 13:37 CET]: >> can somebody kindly answer the fo 21 Dec 2011 07:48:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32664 Hi, I'm setting up a intallation with 2 MLX-e chassis with XMR4000 modules where I'm configuring multiple GRE tunnels to different endpoints, where T 21 Dec 2011 05:22:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32662 On 12/20/2011 3:38 PM, Robert Hass wrote: > Hi > > I'm using FlexLink functionality on one project where we currently > have Cisco switches. We would 20 Dec 2011 13:57:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32654 Hi I'm using FlexLink functionality on one project where we currently have Cisco switches. We would like to migrate to Brocade (probably FastIron CX) 20 Dec 2011 13:38:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32652 * r.bhatia@ipax.at (Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]) [Sat 17 Dec 2011, 13:37 CET]: >can somebody kindly answer the following questions regarding a legacy >foundr 19 Dec 2011 06:27:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32646 Hi CAM profile are affecting to IPv4, IPv6, ACL(v4&v6), vrf, mpls sizes of allocated partitions. In you case there is no solution to increase amoun 17 Dec 2011 04:47:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32638 hi! can somebody kindly answer the following questions regarding a legacy foundry fastiron edge switch (not x series), e.g. the fes4802? 1. how man 17 Dec 2011 04:37:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32637 On Fr, Dez 16, 2011 at 10:22:36 +0400, Valeri Streltsov <v.streltsov@tiera.org> wrote: > Hi > > You should update firmware up to 5.2 > > With multi- 17 Dec 2011 04:23:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32636 Hi again Pieter, Thanks for your reply. I take it that you were doing ECMP then, and have had to disable it? We weren't doing any, but I tried the c 16 Dec 2011 03:19:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32625 Hi You should update firmware up to 5.2 With multi-service-4 profile I have at now: === NetIron MLX LP SL 17: Total SDRAM : 536870912 byte 15 Dec 2011 22:22:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32623 Hi Dunc, Try: "maximum-paths 1" This is just a follow-up regarding the ip nexthop table becoming full all the sudden. I was (unfortunately) able to 15 Dec 2011 12:13:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32613 Hi Pieter & list Does anyone have anything to add to this thread at all yet? It looks like we might be running into a similar thing. I also thought 15 Dec 2011 09:39:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32611 Cisco GLC-SX-MM @ FES2402 running IronWare 04.1.01dTc1 = success, no DOM of course. _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mail 15 Dec 2011 07:26:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32609 On Mi, Dez 14, 2011 at 10:16:49 +0100, "Rolf Hanßen" <nsp@rhanssen.de> wrote: > Hi, > > we had a MLX running at 2% free for approx. one year without 15 Dec 2011 03:12:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32604 Hi, we had a MLX running at 2% free for approx. one year without any issues except Foundry told us there is no way to avoid the error logging. The va 14 Dec 2011 13:16:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32590 Are you sure that message reflects TCAM and not general DRAM? Profiles aside, I believe MLX line cards contain 36 MB of TCAM... and ~22 MB free seems 14 Dec 2011 10:06:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32588 To answer your question: No, you can not use MLX cards in an XMR chassis, nor can you use XMR cards in an MLX chassis. With the MLXe chassis and the 14 Dec 2011 09:51:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32589 A difference in firmware versions may cause continuous rebooting of a module regardless of MLX/XMR designation. 2011/12/14 Franz Georg Köhler <lists@ 14 Dec 2011 09:33:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32587 On Di, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:52:34 +0200, Rens <rens@autempspourmoi.be> wrote: > > Small question regarding the modules interchangeability between MLX-X 14 Dec 2011 06:39:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32586 Hello, I am currently seeing a lot of those messages on a MLX: WARN: Current Total Free Memory (22589440) on LP 1 is below 5 percent of Installed Me 14 Dec 2011 03:32:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32584 Dear All I know Cisco has their OER / pfR routing technology which can route traffic automatically based on a number of matrix's to balance traffic a 03 Dec 2011 23:57:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32531 Hi Chris, thank you for your answer. The problem was a hardware issue. BTW, I don't know about you guys, but in the last couple of months we had A L 29 Nov 2011 03:04:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32491 Fabio Mendes wrote: > My question is, if any of you have faced this, was the problem caused by > hardware, software or misconfiguration ? If it is a 26 Nov 2011 07:54:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32470 Hi guys, looking at list's files I've found this: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/2009-February/001809.html It's a very similar case, 26 Nov 2011 05:34:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32469 We recently acquired some second-user Serveriron 400s (Dual WSM-4, 2*B8GC) to replace our trusty old Serveriron XLs but since then we've been having s 26 Nov 2011 04:49:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32468 On 15/11/2011 05:47, lausgans@gmail.com wrote: > What about Cisco GLC-SX-MM in FastIron Edge switches? > 1) support; At least on a FESX, they do work 15 Nov 2011 02:42:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32321 > Cisco compatible GLC-SX-MM, for example from finisair Thank you. I recently got another confirmation. > what do you mean by DOM? Optical monito 15 Nov 2011 00:35:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32320 On 2011-11-15 06:47, lausgans@gmail.com wrote: > What about Cisco GLC-SX-MM in FastIron Edge switches? > 1) support; > 2) DOM. > ? > I'm asking becaus 15 Nov 2011 00:26:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32319 What about Cisco GLC-SX-MM in FastIron Edge switches? 1) support; 2) DOM. ? I'm asking because i know where to get used GLC-SX-MM at extremely low pri 14 Nov 2011 21:47:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32318 On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:16:44PM +0100, Robert Hass wrote: >What CPU are at MLX/MLX management modules (MR and new MR2) ? I would >like to compare C 11 Nov 2011 09:51:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32310 On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Robert Hass wrote: > What CPU are at MLX/MLX management modules (MR and new MR2) ? I would > like to compare CPU speeds to CER w 11 Nov 2011 05:40:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32305 Hi What CPU are at MLX/MLX management modules (MR and new MR2) ? I would like to compare CPU speeds to CER which I currently using. CER: 800 MHz Powe 11 Nov 2011 05:16:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32304 Hi, I was wondering if there is a Brocade router which can do dhcpv6 prefix delegation snooping to insert the prefix in the routing table or provide d 09 Nov 2011 06:57:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32297 I had something like this happen once on a fiber circuit where one patch cord in the path was multi mode when it should have been single mode. On T 03 Nov 2011 17:56:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32248 If the optic doesn't work, then clean the patch cable, then try swapping for a new patch cable, then try a different port on the TI24X. Jared Valenti 03 Nov 2011 08:36:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32237 I'd try swapping the optic. On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com> wrote: > Howdy, > > > > While troubleshooting anothe 03 Nov 2011 06:27:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32236 Howdy, While troubleshooting another problem I noticed that the crc/input error counter on one of our Turboiron 24s increments a few every couple of 01 Nov 2011 14:11:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32226 I am having my hands full with stability issues and trying to drive all our traffic through our firewalls at our data center. Add to that the fact 20 Oct 2011 17:50:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32117 Hi Robert, Our NLB servers were directly connected to the SX800 cores which was also the router for this VLAN. We tried every possible configuration 20 Oct 2011 11:53:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32104 Hi Raja, Thanks for the quick answer... I do have some insights here with a new question: First of all, was your NLB cluster setup as multica 20 Oct 2011 00:57:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32089 Hi, We had exactly the same problem with NLB on SX and FCX. All traffic would go to a single server, and the setup was never stable enough for produc 19 Oct 2011 03:56:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32051 Hi everyone, Was just referred to this list, hopefully somebody can help me with a very stubborn problem here.. I have been fighting for a few 19 Oct 2011 01:20:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32045 I'm usually incorrect about these things but I was told that they also now support ER optics. thanks, -Drew -----Original Message----- From: foundr 18 Oct 2011 10:23:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/32023 Hello mans. I have a lot prefomance problem with older BigIron 1500. config: #show ver SW: Version 08.0.01wT53 Copyright (c) 1996-2004 Foundry Ne 17 Oct 2011 06:05:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/31999 On 15/10/2011 14:25, Robert Hass wrote: > I just noticed that Brocade released IronWare 7.3 for TurboIron. But > looking at Configuration Guide I see 17 Oct 2011 02:43:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/31997 Hi I just noticed that Brocade released IronWare 7.3 for TurboIron. But looking at Configuration Guide I see that eg. "Multi-range VLAN" is not suppor 15 Oct 2011 05:25:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/31980 On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, I wrote: > A few months ago there was mention that IPv6 routing would be supported > on the FCX "with the next major software re 14 Oct 2011 04:30:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/31971 I'm guessing that when you create a VLAN group, you are limited to performing operations against the entire VLAN group. Ie: you tagged e 1 to 4 in th 13 Oct 2011 10:04:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/31946 On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:03:14 -0400, Randy McAnally wrote > On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:11:36 +0200, Maarten Bollen | Atrato IP > Networks wrote > > how abou 13 Oct 2011 09:26:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/31945 Hello All, I'm looking for opinions and experiences that people have had with heavy-rate Multicast traffic with the XMR and/or MLXe platforms in an e 12 Oct 2011 07:44:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/31927