<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>nsp | foundry</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 11:30:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Specifying an LSP within a VLL</title>
<description>On 2/9/2012 7:08 AM, James Paussa wrote: &amp;gt; I was wondering what everyone&amp;#039;s workarounds were to achieve binding a &amp;gt; VLL to a LSP, essentially the equiv</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:03:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33367</link>
</item><item>
<title>Specifying an LSP within a VLL</title>
<description>I was wondering what everyone&amp;#039;s workarounds were to achieve binding a VLL to a LSP, essentially the equivalent of:  vpls-peer &amp;lt;ip-address&amp;gt; lsp &amp;lt;lsp1</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 05:08:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33361</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Foundry configuration auditing tools?</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not sure I would rely on a config parser to provide me with a security audit in any case. On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Subba Rao &amp;lt;umroute@tanu</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 01:34:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33358</link>
</item><item>
<title>Foundry configuration auditing tools?</title>
<description>Hi, We have a few Foundry Routers and Switches which will be audited soon. In the past I have used Nipper when it was free to assess Cisco network eq</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 08:46:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33347</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Redundant routes</title>
<description>schrieb Nick Gray: &amp;gt; The hand off is Ethernet. Appears to be handing off to two netgear &amp;gt; smart switches linked together ( &amp;#039;switch1&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;switch2&amp;#039; ) o</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 14:16:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33329</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Redundant routes</title>
<description>Thanks for the input! I will not know for sure if this will work until the client comes in later in the week. Cheers! -Nick On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 13:50:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33327</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Redundant routes</title>
<description>The customer might have some kind of loop in their network and when you shut down one interface, it allowed the loop to clear. I don&amp;#039;t see anything w</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 12:17:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33326</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Redundant routes</title>
<description>The hand off is Ethernet. Appears to be handing off to two netgear smart switches linked together ( &amp;#039;switch1&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;switch2&amp;#039; ) on the client&amp;#039;s side. Th</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 11:33:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33325</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Redundant routes</title>
<description>Well, is the circuit delivered over Ethernet? They might have both ports plugged into a switch on their side that is doing something goofy.  On Tue</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 11:10:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33324</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Redundant routes</title>
<description>&amp;#039;vlan123&amp;#039; is independent on either router but I can change it if necessary. I had a feeling the client&amp;#039;s side was having issues which is why I was thr</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 11:07:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/33323</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

