pedro at whack
Oct 29, 2010, 9:40 AM
Post #5 of 5
(1684 views)
Permalink
|
Who manages the PE routers?
Are the links between PE1-SW1 and PE2-SW2 L2 or L3?
It doesn't look like there are any loops that would cause problems in
the migration, but just trying to clarify the PE-topology a bit more
(how do PE1 and PE2 communicate?)
no L2 loops in topology points to a relatively more predictable, less
intrusive migration.
--Peter
On 10/27/2010 3:15 AM, Kabayan wrote:
> I saw extreme configuration, and i didn't found redundancy configuration between two switches. I have guess that the redundancy controlled by PE router because there are twin PE routers too.
> I just found that 2 ports at SW1 connect to 2 ports at SW2
> Here the simple topology
>
> PE ROUTER1 PE ROUTER2
> | |
> | |
> SW1 --------------SW2
>
> # Load Sharing Configuration
> enable sharing Y:XX grouping Y:XX,Y:XX algorithm port-based
> configure lacp keep-alive 10
>
> thx
> Kabayan
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 10/25/10, Nemeth Laszlo<csirek [at] cooler> wrote:
>
>> From: Nemeth Laszlo<csirek [at] cooler>
>> Subject: Re: [F10-nsp] Swapping Switch to Force10
>> To: force10-nsp [at] puck
>> Date: Monday, October 25, 2010, 6:20 AM
>> Hi
>>
>> What is Your redundancy protocol that You are using now
>> between Your
>> extreme switches?
>>
>> Laca
>> _______________________________________________
>> force10-nsp mailing list
>> force10-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/force10-nsp
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> force10-nsp mailing list
> force10-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/force10-nsp
_______________________________________________
force10-nsp mailing list
force10-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/force10-nsp
|
