Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 16:01:30 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On 04/28/2011 11:12 AM, Doug Warner wrote: > We're trying to deploy 10ge upstream to our S50n stack (read, all the port 0 > modules are stacking modul 23 May 2011 12:26:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/29678 On 4/28/11 8:12 AM, Doug Warner wrote: > We're trying to deploy 10ge upstream to our S50n stack (read, all the port 0 > modules are stacking modules). 08 May 2011 11:29:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/29401 We're using SR optics for a short run (~3m). -Doug On 04/29/2011 02:54 PM, Leslie wrote: > Are you using LR optics and it's a short run? I've found 30 Apr 2011 06:50:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/29221 Are you using LR optics and it's a short run? I've found f10 lr xfp's to be finicky if they're receiving above -4db Leslie Sent from the road while 29 Apr 2011 11:54:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/29215 On 28.04.11 17:12, Doug Warner wrote: > We're trying to deploy 10ge upstream to our S50n stack (read, all the port 0 > modules are stacking modules). 29 Apr 2011 10:09:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/29214 We're trying to deploy 10ge upstream to our S50n stack (read, all the port 0 modules are stacking modules). We're seeing a decent amount of Input CRC 28 Apr 2011 08:12:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/29179 I'm trying to put together a matrix of supported IPv6 features for various network and security hardware and one of the vendors that I no longer have 11 Apr 2011 11:10:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/28798 Anyone deploying S60's in significant quantity yet? Would love to know if you are experiencing mysterious reboots, too, because we sure are! -M _____ 08 Apr 2011 16:44:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/28786 On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:10 AM, venkat <venkat.elex@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm wondering if anyone on the list has implemented a control plane >> rate 24 Feb 2011 09:55:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/27800 Hey Matt, What platform are you referring? E-series / C or S?? In-build rate limit for ICMP is already available to protect CP for ICMP flood. Tha 24 Feb 2011 04:10:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/27784 Hey gang -- I'm wondering if anyone on the list has implemented a control plane rate-limiting solution for ICMP similar to the Cisco one outlined in 23 Feb 2011 18:19:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/27748 Hi All, I do have a case open with Force10 support on this, but it's been a long standing issue and I've gone so far as to re-architect our rather 22 Feb 2011 18:30:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/27714 > > hi all, > > for related case, here I share advice from force10 expert : > > > [26/01/2011 21:01:56] Prasanth Sasidharan: what i did was "turn off 27 Jan 2011 22:05:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/27196 I've seen it on one of our S50 switches recently, too, in combination with: Jan 19 16:55:17.78 PST: %STKUNIT0-M:CP %KERN-2-INT: soc_fb_mmu_parity_err 27 Jan 2011 21:50:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/27195 Hi All, What's going on with my switch ? Jan 26 11:42:24.538 UTC: %STKUNIT0-M:CP %KERN-2-INT: soc_l2x_thread: DMA failed: Operation failed Jan 26 11 26 Jan 2011 03:47:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/27167 Hi, I'm doing centralized IP management. All client VLANs is configured as tagged VLANs to some L2 switches using 802.1Q. All clients are connected t 09 Jan 2011 09:30:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/26789 Hi all, I got the problem about power DC Force10 (FTOS 8.3.1.1): -- Power Supplies -- Unit Bay Status Type ------------------------------ 30 Nov 2010 00:36:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/26327 Who manages the PE routers? Are the links between PE1-SW1 and PE2-SW2 L2 or L3? It doesn't look like there are any loops that would cause problems in 29 Oct 2010 09:40:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/25853 I saw extreme configuration, and i didn't found redundancy configuration between two switches. I have guess that the redundancy controlled by PE route 27 Oct 2010 03:15:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/25786 On 10/25/2010 5:33 AM, Kabayan wrote: > Dear All, > > I have planning to swap existing extreme to force10. > Existing topology is we have twin Redunda 25 Oct 2010 07:09:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/25750 Hi > I have planning to swap existing extreme to force10. > Existing topology is we have twin Redundancy extreme switches. > > My question is if we s 25 Oct 2010 06:20:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/25749 Dear All, I have planning to swap existing extreme to force10. Existing topology is we have twin Redundancy extreme switches. My question is if we s 25 Oct 2010 05:33:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/25746 Is there an option to assign a port along with the syslog server when issuing the "logging <ip>" config? I tried "logging <ip>:<port>" but it's not a 23 Jul 2010 11:32:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/24359 We've run into the "LACP restarts during a write mem" bug too, and it prevented us from upgrading beyond FTOS 7.7.1.1 for a long time. I can report t 10 Jul 2010 02:50:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/24184 I've seen a similar issue. In my case, LACP keep alives get dropped and port channels go bye-bye during a write mem. It's not always reproducible but 09 Jul 2010 14:09:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/24181 Has anyone else seen this behaviour: A pair of S50N's running VRRP to a host. When I try to write the config to the switch, it drops about 4 s 09 Jul 2010 09:32:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/24178 A quick note on the E300 and Terascale product route capacity. Single-cam linecards support 256k ipv4 routes. Dual-cam cards support 512k routes. The 18 Jun 2010 15:36:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/23915 On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:15 AM, Frederic Jaeckel wrote: > I'm looking forward to use the E300 as a BGP peering platform and I'm > wondering if someone alr 09 Jun 2010 16:20:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/23790 * jchome@jc-ix.net (Frederic Jaeckel) [Wed 09 Jun 2010, 13:52 CEST]: > I'm looking forward to use the E300 as a BGP peering platform and > I'm wonder 09 Jun 2010 06:05:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/23769 Hi, I'm looking forward to use the E300 as a BGP peering platform and I'm wondering if someone already did that and maybe has some experiences to sha 09 Jun 2010 04:15:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/23768 * kiwi@oav.net (Xavier Beaudouin) [Mon 07 Jun 2010, 10:22 CEST]: >Le 4 juin 2010 à 16:50, Niels Bakker a écrit : >> * kiwi@oav.net (Xavier Beaudouin) 07 Jun 2010 01:43:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/23727 Hi Le 4 juin 2010 à 16:50, Niels Bakker a écrit : > * kiwi@oav.net (Xavier Beaudouin) [Fri 04 Jun 2010, 11:47 CEST]: >> I have a couple of S50N but 07 Jun 2010 01:22:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/23726 * kiwi@oav.net (Xavier Beaudouin) [Fri 04 Jun 2010, 11:47 CEST]: >I have a couple of S50N but it seems to not like SFTOS upgrade to >2.5.2 (I am curr 04 Jun 2010 07:50:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/23695 Hi there, I have a couple of S50N but it seems to not like SFTOS upgrade to 2.5.2 (I am currently on 2.2.x)... What is the best way to do that ? I h 04 Jun 2010 02:16:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/23687 I'm using an s50n running FTOS 7.8.1.3 and noticed that I don't have any counter information for my VLAN interfaces, for example: #show int vlan 14 V 30 Apr 2010 11:58:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/22941 I would say that it's definitely not normal and worth calling your rep about. It's probably worth mentioning that I've never considered their, or anyo 26 Feb 2010 12:23:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/21792 We've been demoing some S50n units and have been having some problems which I have a hard time seeing are "normal", but wanted to get some outside per 26 Feb 2010 10:26:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/21790 I just wanted to report back that we moved the multicast routing off this switch stack on on to a cisco router and the switch seems to have stabilized 23 Feb 2010 08:41:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/21729 Thanks again. If anyone else has any further insight on these switches they want to share, I'd sure appreciate it. -- Bud On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9 12 Feb 2010 08:03:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/21531 Oh ... and one last thing I noticed from your story. These older S50 switches are really sensitive to continual port bouncing/state changes (something 12 Feb 2010 07:53:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/21530 I think the latest production release of SFTOS should be 2.5.3.7 On Feb 12, 2010, at 6:35 AM, wwbach@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks David. Is there a ne 12 Feb 2010 07:48:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/21529 Thanks David. Is there a new or older version of sftos that you would recommend as more stable (assuming I could obtain it). Thanks. -- Bud On Thu, F 12 Feb 2010 06:35:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/21528 On that code rev I've experienced similar issues on occasion on certain chassis even with a single switch not stacking .... David On Feb 11, 2010, 11 Feb 2010 20:52:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/21524 We've recently picked up three used force10 SA-01-GE-48T switches. We're experiencing random issues where is seems like a significant portion of the 11 Feb 2010 18:18:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/21523 Doug Warner wrote: > Subject: [F10-nsp] Using S50n for distribution > > > The biggest questions I have: > * can this handle a filtered BGP feed > 18 Jan 2010 10:10:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/21007 I'm considering getting a pair of S50n's for use in a colo setting. I'm liking the S50n's versus C6500 or C150 due to the following: * we're not curr 12 Jan 2010 15:03:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/20938 Oof, ok. We've got some vlans that aren't contiguous, so it'll be a long "int range ..." line. But oh well. Thanks, -----Original Message----- Fro 06 Nov 2009 13:20:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/20155 William S. Duncanson wrote: > What's the FTOS equivalent to Cisco's: > Switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > Switchport mode trunk > ? You can't sim 06 Nov 2009 09:42:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/20144 Hi William S. Duncanson wrote: > What's the FTOS equivalent to Cisco's: > Switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > Switchport mode trunk > ? interface 06 Nov 2009 09:10:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/20142 On 2009-11-06, at 17:52, William S. Duncanson wrote: > What's the FTOS equivalent to Cisco's: > Switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > Switchport mod 06 Nov 2009 09:06:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/20143 What's the FTOS equivalent to Cisco's: Switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q Switchport mode trunk ? I'm seeing "vlan-stack trunk", but that seems to 06 Nov 2009 08:52:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/20141 On 24.10.2009 20:03 Peter Kranz wrote > Thinking of using the S50V as an edge switch, taking advantage of its > BGP and OSPF capabilities. Does anyo 24 Oct 2009 13:08:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/19935 Thinking of using the S50V as an edge switch, taking advantage of its BGP and OSPF capabilities. Does anyone know how many routes it can handle before 24 Oct 2009 11:03:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/19934 force10-nsp-request@puck.nether.net wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:28:35 -0300 > From: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." > Subject: [F10-nsp] Force1 03 Sep 2008 19:34:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/15399 Hi list, I am looking for a L2/L3 capable ethernet router with 20Gig ports in my core, that should do full bgp feeds from multiple upstreams w/ , IPv 30 Aug 2008 01:20:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/15337 Hi. I'm trying to spec a Force10 box to replace a Cisco 7603 with SUP720-3BXL, with the following goals in mind: - The smaller the box, the better (r 26 Aug 2008 16:28:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/15294 Hey Greg, That looks much better. Works like a charm on my E600s. Thanks! sk Greg Hankins wrote: > Well, that was annoying. Sorry about that, an o 30 Jun 2008 18:46:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/14702 Well, that was annoying. Sorry about that, an overzealous regex was truncating output in a couple of places. Your serial numbers should look better 30 Jun 2008 18:38:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/14701 Greg Hankins wrote: > A new f10rancid module that supports all Force10 devices running FTOS is > now available. Hi Greg, One little bug so far: ou 26 Jun 2008 16:35:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/14678 A new f10rancid module that supports all Force10 devices running FTOS is now available. John Heasley did most of the work, and I added some tweaks fo 26 Jun 2008 16:14:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/14676 On Jun 19, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Saou wrote: > Thanks for the answer. Maybe I wasn't clear enough : I'm not getting > any default gateway (0.0.0 19 Jun 2008 10:38:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/14564 Marcus Stoegbauer wrote : > Matthias Saou wrote: > > This list seems very calm lately, but it's the first place I've found > > for Force10 technical 19 Jun 2008 10:18:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/14556 Hi, Matthias Saou wrote: > This list seems very calm lately, but it's the first place I've found > for Force10 technical discussions, so here I go... 19 Jun 2008 08:57:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/14555 Hi everyone, This list seems very calm lately, but it's the first place I've found for Force10 technical discussions, so here I go... I just bought 19 Jun 2008 06:09:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/14550 Thanks for the info. Although comparing the 2 price wise, they are only a few thousand difference, so why not go for it. Regards, Brendan Mannella T 17 Jan 2008 14:26:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2076 As Jo alluded to, if you don't need IPv6 support, you can change the cam profile to disable it (and gain more IPv4 routes in the process)...you'll o 17 Jan 2008 14:13:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2075 I don't think that 320k routes will ever happen except by a de-aggregation mistake. Check out the published tables of routing growth... Brendan Man 15 Jan 2008 14:59:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2074 This was exactly my initial concern. I read on their website that their default CAM profile allowed for 256k routes. But what happens when full routes 15 Jan 2008 14:01:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2073 * bmannella at teraswitch.com (Brendan Mannella) [Tue 15 Jan 2008, 22:34 CET]: >I am looking to consolidate my 2 juniper m7i's and Foundry BigIron >4 15 Jan 2008 13:50:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2072 We have several E300s in exactly the same environment but with more transit providers. We've been very happy with them. You *must* get v7 software, 15 Jan 2008 13:49:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2071 I am looking to consolidate my 2 juniper m7i's and Foundry BigIron 4000's into a E300 and was hoping to hear what users thought of thei r equipment, i 15 Jan 2008 12:53:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2070 So does anyone know why FTOS 7.5.1.0 was taken off Force 10s support download site? Keith O'Neill Pando Networks 07 Sep 2007 03:00:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2069 > On 6/19/07, Jo Rhett <jrhett at svcolo.com> wrote: >> If you build your own internal management tools, you may have >> found the >> following page 01 Aug 2007 09:54:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2068 On 6/19/07, Jo Rhett <jrhett at svcolo.com> wrote: > If you build your own internal management tools, you may have found the > following page lacking 01 Aug 2007 09:46:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2067 If you build your own internal management tools, you may have found the following page lacking in useful details: https://www.force10networks.com/ 19 Jun 2007 01:42:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2066 On 4/25/07, Maarten Bollen <maarten at dwaas.org> wrote: > > You probably run FTOS 6.x version where this information isn't > exported to the collecto 25 Apr 2007 12:11:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2065 Sameer, AS data was missing from the Sflow implementation for FTOS 6.5.x you will need to upgrade to 7.4.1 to get that data. Its there now with 7.4 25 Apr 2007 10:48:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2064 Hi Sameer, On Apr 25, 2007, at 4:53 PM, Sameer Khosla wrote: > Has anyone run into this... > > I am taking the sflow data from an E-300 and trying t 25 Apr 2007 07:44:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2063 Has anyone run into this... I am taking the sflow data from an E-300 and trying to convert it to netflow so I can use it with flow tools and flow vie 25 Apr 2007 06:53:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2062 InMon Traffic Sentinel all the way. As with any powerful piece of software it can be a trick to use, but it is extremely powerful. Cliff Fogle Senio 13 Apr 2007 08:16:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2061 Alright, I know I have brought this up before, but I am extremely curious on what Sflow collectors everyone is using now that 7.4.1.0 has been relea 13 Apr 2007 08:10:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2060 Correct. On Mar 15, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Jo Rhett wrote: > On Mar 14, 2007, at 3:25 PM, David Rodgers wrote: >> I've upgraded a couple of switches to t 15 Mar 2007 11:37:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2059 On Mar 14, 2007, at 3:25 PM, David Rodgers wrote: > I've upgraded a couple of switches to the 7.4.1 code. It appears to > be very stable and I'm looki 15 Mar 2007 10:20:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2058 On Mar 14, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Keith wrote: > 1) Has anyone upgraded to the latest release of FTOS 7.4.1.0? Any > known > issues? We started with it 15 Mar 2007 10:19:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2057 On 3/14/07, Shane Foster <sfoster at zillow.com> wrote: > Does it have AS number in it? > We're using the inmon stuff to convert sflow to netflow, and 14 Mar 2007 18:26:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2056 On 3/14/07, Keith <keith at pando.com> wrote: > Phase II sFlow is key for me. Are you using ntop or did you go with > Inmon's Traffic manager? yuck - 14 Mar 2007 18:25:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2055 Phase II sFlow is key for me. Are you using ntop or did you go with Inmon's Traffic manager? Aaron Glenn wrote: > On 3/14/07, Keith <keith at pand 14 Mar 2007 14:32:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2053 I've upgraded a couple of switches to the 7.4.1 code. It appears to be very stable and I'm looking forward to (in theory) being able to do a hitless 14 Mar 2007 14:25:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2054 On 3/14/07, Keith <keith at pando.com> wrote: > 1) Has anyone upgraded to the latest release of FTOS 7.4.1.0? Any known > issues? How is the sflow upg 14 Mar 2007 14:22:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2052 1) Has anyone upgraded to the latest release of FTOS 7.4.1.0? Any known issues? How is the sflow upgrade? I love the resequence command for ACLs, th 14 Mar 2007 11:48:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2051 >> Is anyone here willing to be a reference either for or against using >> Force10 as both port aggregation and border routing? I'd happily buy > 24 Jan 2007 08:05:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2050 Jo Rhett <jrhett <at> svcolo.com> writes: > > We are evaluating several architectures to replace our existing > Extreme Black Diamond switch backb 23 Jan 2007 22:50:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2049 Andy Myers wrote: > We've encountered some buffering issues when data transits > from higher speed (1 and 10 gig) to lower speed links (100 meg). Can 10 Jan 2007 09:01:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2048 We have a ring of S50's, so perhaps our application isn't that similar to yours. We've encountered some buffering issues when data transits from high 10 Jan 2007 07:20:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2047 We are evaluating several architectures to replace our existing Extreme Black Diamond switch backbone. Right now the choices are to use Force10 a 08 Jan 2007 19:06:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2046 Thanks Adam, I have a NAS head with 4 NICs connected to E300.A few days ago, the NAS head had got stuck during boot up. At that time the throttles c 21 Dec 2006 00:47:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2045 Those are ethernet flow-control frames, and are usually generated by a slower speed device on the switching fabric receiving packets faster than it ca 20 Dec 2006 05:49:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2044 On some interfaces in my E300 the throttles counter had incremented (applox. 30times/sec). What does this counter mean and what can cause this counter 19 Dec 2006 22:43:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2043 01 Aug 2006 01:38:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2042 Hi, I guess I'm probably going about this the wrong way, but... What I'd like is to configure a port on an S50 such that it sends out BPDUs for span 22 May 2006 10:47:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/force10/2041