marcin at leon
Nov 22, 2009, 12:31 PM
Post #2 of 2
(686 views)
Permalink
|
Robert Jacobs wrote:
> I believe there is a slight size difference also... If I still have one
> of the older cards I can compare for you Tuesday (off this Monday) if
> you want.
if you could be so nice, I'll appreciate.
Regards,
Marcin
>
>
>
> Phonoscope
> Robert Jacobs
> Network / IT Director
> Direct 832-615-7742
> Cell 281-830-2092
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcin Kuczera [mailto:marcin [at] leon]
> Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 2:10 PM
> To: Robert Jacobs
> Cc: extreme-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: Re: extreme-nsp Digest, Vol 65, Issue 1
>
> Robert Jacobs wrote:
>> The correct card for the 400 is for sure the 16111 card. It is
>> different that the 16112 and 16113 cards. It is also twice as much.
>> You must also be running code rev 7.4 or newer for the card to be
>> recognized. The card and Xenpak's are not hot swappable so the 400
> must
>> be powered off to install the card. ...Hope this helps and answers
> your
>> question
>
> ok,
> I was just wondering what happens if 400 is loaded with 16112 or 16113
> card. Because the interface is the same (I suppose so, if 16111 works
> with x450), probably only the software upgrade should make them
> working.. but there is no info about such compatibility...
>
> Regards,
> Marcin
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Phonoscope
>> Robert Jacobs
>> Network / IT Director
>> Direct 832-615-7742
>> Cell 281-830-2092
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: extreme-nsp-bounces [at] puck
>> [mailto:extreme-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of
>> extreme-nsp-request [at] puck
>> Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 11:00 AM
>> To: extreme-nsp [at] puck
>> Subject: extreme-nsp Digest, Vol 65, Issue 1
>>
>> Send extreme-nsp mailing list submissions to
>> extreme-nsp [at] puck
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/extreme-nsp
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> extreme-nsp-request [at] puck
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> extreme-nsp-owner [at] puck
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of extreme-nsp digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. 10G modules for Summit 400-48t (Marcin Kuczera)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:31:26 +0100
>> From: Marcin Kuczera <marcin [at] leon>
>> To: extreme-nsp [at] puck
>> Subject: [e-nsp] 10G modules for Summit 400-48t
>> Message-ID: <4B094B3E.3050108 [at] leon>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>> hello,
>>
>> the documentation of Summit 400-48t sais, that the extension module is
>
>> XGM2-2xn.
>> That's exactly the same module as for x450a.
>>
>> Ok, but - Summit 400 is out of production, so no new extension modules
>
>> were added here.
>> For x450 there are addidional modules like XGM2-2xf (XFP) and XGM2-2sf
>
>> (SFP+).
>>
>> From pracical point of view, will they work with Summit 400 ???
>>
>> Regards,
>> Marcin
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extreme-nsp mailing list
>> extreme-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/extreme-nsp
>>
>> End of extreme-nsp Digest, Vol 65, Issue 1
>> ******************************************
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
extreme-nsp mailing list
extreme-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/extreme-nsp
|
