Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Netapp: toasters

R: Snapdrive alternative

 

 

Netapp toasters RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


G.Milazzo at sinergy

Apr 25, 2008, 2:52 AM

Post #1 of 5 (343 views)
Permalink
R: Snapdrive alternative

Not very stable?
I suggest you to review your environment for we've lot of W2K3 systems and heavy apps (SPS, E2K3, E2K7, SQL fm 2K to 2K5...) using Snapdrive (fm 4.x to 5.x) and SManager since months with no issues at all...(fiber and iSCSI)



-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: owner-toasters[at]mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters[at]mathworks.com] Per conto di Steve Rieger
Inviato: venerdì 25 aprile 2008 4.05
A: toasters[at]mathworks.com
Oggetto: Snapdrive alternative

We found that snapdrive is not very stable. Are there any alternatives ?

Setup is as follows
Win 2k3 servers
Sql dbs
3070c running 7.2.2
With fiber
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile


lists at up-south

Apr 25, 2008, 9:52 AM

Post #2 of 5 (323 views)
Permalink
Re: R: Snapdrive alternative [In reply to]

Milazzo Giacomo wrote:
> Not very stable?
> I suggest you to review your environment for we've lot of W2K3 systems and heavy apps (SPS, E2K3, E2K7, SQL fm 2K to 2K5...) using Snapdrive (fm 4.x to 5.x) and SManager since months with no issues at all...(fiber and iSCSI)
>
>
>
all our servers are vanila installs (new setups)
win 2k3 64 bit fully patched,
mpio from MS is installed
iscsi from MS is installed
snapdrive 5.0 is installed
hosts are tied into AD.
local user on host is snapdrive, also created a user on the filer
"snapdrive", added user to Administrators group.
snapdrive runs as the local user "snapdrive"
created volumes, shared them to everybody via cifs
when i go to snapdrive on the host side, i keep getting RPC errors,
however i can see the volumes, and can create luns, but can not mount
the luns.

to summarize

do i actually need snapdrive to mount luns ? or can this be done, via
windows drive mapping ?
if via drive mapping, how would i expand a volume ?


G.Milazzo at sinergy

Apr 25, 2008, 10:41 AM

Post #3 of 5 (323 views)
Permalink
R: Snapdrive alternative [In reply to]

Completely agree!



Da: owner-toasters[at]mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters[at]mathworks.com] Per conto di De Wit Tom (Consultant)
Inviato: venerdì 25 aprile 2008 16.26
A: Webster, Stetson; Smith,Eddie; lists[at]up-south.com; toasters[at]mathworks.com
Oggetto: RE: Snapdrive alternative



In my experience with dozens of customers, I found that instable snapdrive issues where almost always caused by the customer not following the hardware interoperability matrix (wrong MS iSCSI version (even too new!), incompatible HBA or HBA driver/firmware, not supported server HW or OS version, ...). Also MPIO problems can cause Snapdrive instability. Do upgrade to DSM 3.1 as it is much more stable than 3.0.



I have very good experience with Snapdrive 4.2.1. This was really a nice piece of software, so I tend to stay with it and still have to be convinced to go to 5.x ...



A nice trick with slow performing Snapdrive software can also be to set the preffered filer IP address in the Snapdrive configuration for all filers you connect to. This can make a huge difference in visualisation speed. I got this trick from Netapp support, they can really help solving Snapdrive issues so do create a case there !



Grtz,

Tom De Wit

Uptime Belgium



________________________________

From: owner-toasters[at]mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters[at]mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Webster, Stetson
Sent: vrijdag 25 april 2008 13:38
To: Smith,Eddie; lists[at]up-south.com; toasters[at]mathworks.com
Subject: RE: Snapdrive alternative

I went back and read this email and found a promising aspect of the nature of this setup.

With FC, the odds are extremely high that your issue is in the configuration of your MPIO stack which is an important pre-requisite step for a stable SnapDrive deployment. You can actually verify these steps in the SnapDrive installation guide.

But either way, the support center is very capable of isolating this and is your best source for detailed, conclusive analysis.




Pardon brevity, typos, etc; sent from mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith,Eddie
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 02:59 AM Pacific Standard Time
To: Webster, Stetson; lists[at]up-south.com; toasters[at]mathworks.com
Subject: RE: Snapdrive alternative

I think Stetson forgot to mention that you also need to shut the OS down as well otherwise your NTFS buffer cache will not get flushed and you will still be inconsistent...

You really need SnapDrive or a piece of software like the "sync" driver in VMware which will ensure that your system will boot up afterwards. Not sure if there are any alternatives on the market though.

SnapDrive isn't unstable (I have multiple happy people who think it isn't) ...I'm sure if you have any issues they can be sorted without looking for an alternative.

Even better use SnapManager for SQL, this uses Microsoft APIs to ensure that not only the OS but the database is properly consistent during backups.

Honestly though, if SnapDrive is causing you pain I'm sure it can be fixed - call up NetApp support and you'll get a good response.

If you don't have support, firstly you should....but if its a generic issue I'm sure there are people out there that can help.

cheers
Eddie
________________________________

From: Webster, Stetson
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 4:44 AM
To: lists[at]up-south.com; toasters[at]mathworks.com
Subject: RE: Snapdrive alternative



Yes. It's simple. Just stop the db's, confirm completion of the stop, take a snapshot, restart db's.


Pardon brevity, typos, etc; sent from mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Rieger [mailto:lists[at]up-south.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 07:32 PM Pacific Standard Time
To: toasters[at]mathworks.com
Subject: Snapdrive alternative

We found that snapdrive is not very stable. Are there any alternatives ?

Setup is as follows
Win 2k3 servers
Sql dbs
3070c running 7.2.2
With fiber
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile


chris.holloway at DNSArrow

Apr 25, 2008, 11:11 AM

Post #4 of 5 (322 views)
Permalink
RE: R: Snapdrive alternative [In reply to]

I've seen RPC errors on SnapDrive before with a customer. Does the LUN get created on the filer and then not mounted on the server?

In this case, it turned out to be this bug:

http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=103404

Sorting the name resolution fixed it.

Cheers
Chris


--------------------------------------------------------

Christopher Holloway
Lead Consultant
Professional Services


Main: +44 (0)1423 519000
Direct: +44 (0)1423 519099
Mobile: +44 (0)7867 783584
Fax: +44 (0)1423 504415

DNS Arrow launches new enhanced customer portal - Inform an e-commerce partner tool to help customers save time and money in procurement.
For more information on Inform, please contact your account manager on 0800 983 2525 or register for an account at www.dnsarrow.co.uk/inform


DNS Arrow
Nidderdale House
Beckwith Knowle
Harrogate
HG3 1SA
www.DNSarrow.co.uk





Email Confidentiality Notice: This message is private and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system.

"DNS Arrow" means Digital Network Services (UK) Limited, a company registered in England. Company Registration Number 3952678.
Registered Office: Nidderdale House, Otley Road, Beckwith Knowle, Harrogate HG3 1SA, UK.









________________________________


From: owner-toasters[at]mathworks.com on behalf of Bluezman
Sent: Fri 25/04/2008 17:52
To: Milazzo Giacomo
Cc: toasters[at]mathworks.com
Subject: Re: R: Snapdrive alternative



Milazzo Giacomo wrote:
> Not very stable?
> I suggest you to review your environment for we've lot of W2K3 systems and heavy apps (SPS, E2K3, E2K7, SQL fm 2K to 2K5...) using Snapdrive (fm 4.x to 5.x) and SManager since months with no issues at all...(fiber and iSCSI)
>
>
>
all our servers are vanila installs (new setups)
win 2k3 64 bit fully patched,
mpio from MS is installed
iscsi from MS is installed
snapdrive 5.0 is installed
hosts are tied into AD.
local user on host is snapdrive, also created a user on the filer
"snapdrive", added user to Administrators group.
snapdrive runs as the local user "snapdrive"
created volumes, shared them to everybody via cifs
when i go to snapdrive on the host side, i keep getting RPC errors,
however i can see the volumes, and can create luns, but can not mount
the luns.

to summarize

do i actually need snapdrive to mount luns ? or can this be done, via
windows drive mapping ?
if via drive mapping, how would i expand a volume ?


lists at up-south

Apr 25, 2008, 12:21 PM

Post #5 of 5 (314 views)
Permalink
Re: R: Snapdrive alternative [In reply to]

Holloway, Chris wrote:
>
> I've seen RPC errors on SnapDrive before with a customer. Does the
> LUN get created on the filer and then not mounted on the server?
>
> In this case, it turned out to be this bug:
>
> http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=103404
> <http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=103404>
>
> Sorting the name resolution fixed it.
>
this was the issue,

the filers hostname (locally) was fl1
the filers hostname (in AD) was irfl1

when the windows host connected via snapdrive we put it the ip addy,
which caused the issue,
we changed the filers hostname (locally) to irfl1, and updated the hosts
file.

all good now.

Netapp toasters RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.