
Andre.Clark at earthlink
Jan 14, 2010, 4:17 PM
Post #6 of 8
(3285 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: SnapMirror for data migration within the same controller
[In reply to]
|
|
I need to use SnapMirror because the cutover is not going to be right after the initial copy (I have close to 6TB on multiple volumes) so I need to keep incremental going until that time. AC On 1/14/10 4:54 PM, "Fox, Adam" <Adam.Fox [at] netapp> wrote: > The vol copy option is a good one as long as you don¹t want to do incremental > updates. Vol copy is simply an level 0-only version of SnapMirror (and it¹s > free). What you get with SnapMirror are things like block level incrementals, > the ability to schedule those updates, qtree-level replication options, the > ability to resync after a break without re-initialization, sync and semi-sync > options, and probably a few others. > > -- Adam Fox > Systems Engineer > adamfox [at] netapp > > > From: Romeo Theriault [mailto:romeotheriault [at] gmail] > Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 6:12 AM > To: Michael Schipp; André M. Clark > Cc: toasters [at] mathworks > Subject: Re: SnapMirror for data migration within the same controller > >> If you do not need snapshots then maybe vol copy will do what you need. > > > vol copy can copy snapshots as well. >From 7.2.6.1 vol man page, > vol copy start [ -S | -s snapshot ] source destination > > Copies all data, including snapshots, from one vol- > ume to another. If the -S flag is used, the com- > mand copies all snapshots in the source volume to > the destination volume. To specify a particular > snapshot to copy, use the -s flag followed by the > name of the snapshot. > > > > Though I'm not sure this would be any faster than a snapmirror. > > Andre, I'd be interested to hear what your outcome of this eventually is. > > > Thanks,
|