
phigmov at gmail
Sep 6, 2009, 2:19 PM
Post #2 of 2
(442 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: R: SQL 2005 reacts badly to a cluster giveback ?
[In reply to]
|
|
Thanks for all the advice - the key take aways would appear to be - * try the host utilities - they make registry tweaks to key time out values * failover / giveback can be a little slow on the low-end FAS models As suggested I had a bit of a poke around NOW and came across some interesting stuff * http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/mpio/win/reldsm31/html/software/install/concept3.htm We don't use MPIO but I'll try the registry tweak. I'm still unsure wether this was a problem or not under SD 4.2.1 - I don't think it was but these reboots are so infrequent its hard to recall. We're replacing our 270C with a 2050HA so hopefuly failover speed will improve. Do people install the Host Utilities as a standard ? The notes seem to relate more towards FC rather than iSCSI setups so I've held off using them. Cheers, Raj. On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Milazzo Giacomo <G.Milazzo[at]sinergy.it>wrote: > Among the other things reported there's another one. > 270 (and 20X0) are "slow" filer when they performs a takeover or a > giveback. > ISCSI hosts (both physical and VMs) are faster for these reasons there are > a couple of Windows registry keys to increase the timeouts of iSCSI "hba". > > These is well documented on NOW. > > Regards, > > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: owner-toasters[at]mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters[at]mathworks.com] Per > conto di Leimann, Olaf > Inviato: martedė 1 settembre 2009 14.50 > A: Filip Sneppe; Jack Lyons > Cc: Raj Patel; toasters[at]mathworks.com > Oggetto: RE: SQL 2005 reacts badly to a cluster giveback ? > > Hi, > > The Hostname/IP Address paris in PreferredIPAddresses in > Snapdrive are NOT for the iSCSI traffic, they are meant for the > management (RPC) traffic, and they need to be reverse-resolvable > and normal network ports on the Filer reachable from the Guest-OS > network. > > iSCSI traffic is only determined by the setting in the initiator. > > For the failover: make sure you use Host Utilities for ESX 5.0R2 or 5.1 > and normally the config)hba should be run during the install. A reboot > is then required! > -- > Olaf Leimann > > -----Original Message----- > From: Filip Sneppe [mailto:filip.sneppe[at]gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 1 september 2009 13:30 > To: Jack Lyons > Cc: Raj Patel; toasters[at]mathworks.com > Subject: Re: SQL 2005 reacts badly to a cluster giveback ? > > Hi, > > Yes, the preferred IP address was set (using hostname/IP address pairs). > I have no indication of name resolution issues, ie. the LAN interfaces of > the > filers are statis DNS entries, and the iSCSI IP addresses are set using > the filer preferred IP addresses in SnapDrive. > > Best regards, > Filip > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Jack Lyons<jack1729[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > Did you set the prefered filer IP address in snapdrive config. Did you > > setup your iscsi target using hostname or ip's, could there be name > > resolution issues? > > > > Filip Sneppe wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Yes, all hosts are on the same subnet, no jumbo frames are involved, and > >> for iSCSI, single_image mode isn't really relevant... > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Filip > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Jack Lyons<jack1729[at]gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> We are about to implement a new SQL 2005 (x64) on NetApp so I will > follow > >>> this thread pretty closely. We have built a few virtual-virtual > >>> active-active clusters and virtual-physical active-active clusters for > in > >>> house developed software with no issues. > >>> > >>> I assume that the iscsi NIC is on the same segment as the storage? > >>> I assume you are not using jumbo frames? > >>> I assume your netapp cluster is configure for single image mode? > >>> > >>> > >>> Raj Patel wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi. > >>>> > >>>> We've had a couple of cluster-failover events on our FAS270c (watchdog > >>>> errors every time) on 7.2.5.1 > >>>> > >>>> The failover is fine (AFAIK) when one of the nodes reboots - however > in > >>>> the Giveback it appears that the SQL server has a couple of initiator > >>>> errors > >>>> events logged and although the drives are visible (and working in > terms > >>>> of > >>>> I/O) and the SQL services are still running any SQL dependent > >>>> applications > >>>> just don't work after the giveback. As soon as I stop/start the SQL > >>>> services > >>>> its all back to normal (or I reboot the box). > >>>> > >>>> Server is Windows 2003sp2, its a VM on ESX3.5, the iSCSI interface > goes > >>>> through a dedicated iSCSI NIC (a virtual switch which also carries the > >>>> ESX > >>>> iSCSI LUN's) Snapdrive is 6.01, iSCSI initiator is 2.03 and its a > 32bit > >>>> VM. > >>>> > >>>> Oddly Exchange didn't miss a beat (they're physical Windows 2008 64 > bit > >>>> servers) but SQL was definitely unhappy (even though the SQL service > >>>> itself > >>>> carried on - ie it didn't stop). > >>>> > >>>> Any ideas ? I note theres a newer iSCSI initiator available (2.08) > from > >>>> Microsoft. I'm pretty sure we haven't had this Giveback issue with our > >>>> old > >>>> SnapDrive 4.2.1 setup on the same server. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks in advance, > >>>> Raj. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
|