Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Netapp: toasters

NetApp3140 v EMC CX4-240

 

 

Netapp toasters RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


Paul.McGuinness at fineos

Apr 27, 2009, 2:19 AM

Post #1 of 2 (1211 views)
Permalink
NetApp3140 v EMC CX4-240

I am after opinions / Pros and Cons on running a substantial VMware
infrastructure of approximate 200+ VMs using the 2 mentioned storage
systems.



Obvious benefits of the NetApp seem to be around the De-Dupe out of the
box. Any other thoughts / experiences would be appreciated



Fibre attached Dell R900s will be running the ESX side of things.



Paul McGuinness

Infrastructure Services Manager


FINEOS Corporation
ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS for INSURANCE, BANCASSURANCE AND SOCIAL INSURANCE




__________________________________________________________
FINEOS Corporation is the global brand name of FINEOS Corporation Limited and its affiliated group companies worldwide.
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential, may be privileged and is intended
only for the use of the recipient named above. If you are not the intended recipient or a
representative of the intended recipient, you have received this e-mail in error and must
not copy, use or disclose the contents of this e-mail to anybody else.

If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return
e-mail and permanently delete the copy you received. This e-mail has been swept for
computer viruses. However, you should carry out your own virus checks.
Registered in Ireland, No. 205721. http://www.FINEOS.com
__________________________________________________________


jeremy.page at gilbarco

Apr 27, 2009, 6:14 AM

Post #2 of 2 (1076 views)
Permalink
RE: NetApp3140 v EMC CX4-240 [In reply to]

Running ESX over NFS is (imo) the way to go. I moved from FC to NFS
about 2 years ago (2.5.4) and have never looked back. Being able to
restore crash consistent out of the box and the extra flexibility of
being able to access your VMDK files directly instead of through VMFS is
very nice. We're currently running 300 VMs on 5 IBM 3850m2s with dual 1
gig connections to our switches and then dual 10g to the filer itself.
Most of my VMs are on SATA with the higher IO boxes on 15k FC disks.
Dedup is also very nice, just realize that the first time you run the
SIS job (the dedup process) it will hammer your disks since it has to
look at every block with data on it.



If you're hard set on block based storage then I don't think the Netapp
boxes are worth it, but I really think NFS is the way to go. Having the
extra layer of abstraction may be a bit less efficient, but the extra
flexibility and related uptime is very much worth it.



Jeremy M. Page____________________

Systems Architect

* email:Jeremy.Page [at] gilbarco - * phone: 336.547.5399 - 6 fax:
336.547.5163 - * cell: 336.601.7274

________________________________

From: owner-toasters [at] mathworks [mailto:owner-toasters [at] mathworks]
On Behalf Of Paul McGuinness
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 5:19 AM
To: toasters [at] mathworks
Subject: NetApp3140 v EMC CX4-240



I am after opinions / Pros and Cons on running a substantial VMware
infrastructure of approximate 200+ VMs using the 2 mentioned storage
systems.



Obvious benefits of the NetApp seem to be around the De-Dupe out of the
box. Any other thoughts / experiences would be appreciated



Fibre attached Dell R900s will be running the ESX side of things.



Paul McGuinness

Infrastructure Services Manager


FINEOS Corporation
ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS for INSURANCE, BANCASSURANCE AND SOCIAL INSURANCE



__________________________________________________________

FINEOS Corporation is the global brand name of FINEOS Corporation
Limited and its affiliated group companies worldwide.

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential, may be
privileged and is intended

only for the use of the recipient named above. If you are not the
intended recipient or a

representative of the intended recipient, you have received this e-mail
in error and must

not copy, use or disclose the contents of this e-mail to anybody else.



If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
immediately by return

e-mail and permanently delete the copy you received. This e-mail has
been swept for

computer viruses. However, you should carry out your own virus checks.

Registered in Ireland, No. 205721. http://www.FINEOS.com

__________________________________________________________





Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or
re-transmit this email. If you have received this email in error,
please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone
(call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any
attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance.

In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of
this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of,
any
contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the
foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any
digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is
included in any attachment to this email.

Netapp toasters RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.