<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Netapp | toasters</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>25 Nov  2009 05:26:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>RE: Power change 110 to 208v without downtime</title>
<description>Now that&amp;#039;s why I like toasters. -----Original Message----- From: Brad Reger [mailto:reger@netapp.com] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 5:33 PM To: Le</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 17:48:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10485</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Power change 110 to 208v without downtime</title>
<description>We in Engineering think this is fine and works. It&amp;#039;s probably obvious but: 1. observe software environmental monitoring to verify both PSUs are up an</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:32:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10484</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: SMVI 2.0 problem</title>
<description>Here are couple of things to check: 1. Make sure the SFR session you created is still active and not expired. You can check it from Restore GUI page.</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:03:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10483</link>
</item><item>
<title>SMVI 2.0 problem</title>
<description>ok, scratching my head here... I just upgraded the new SMVI 2.0 with file level restore.. HURAYY.. Its only been a year, but I guess you cant rush pe</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 13:37:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10482</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Power change 110 to 208v without downtime</title>
<description>It works. I&amp;#039;ve done it. Gotta check on support. -----Original Message----- From: Page, Jeremy &amp;lt;jeremy.page@gilbarco.com&amp;gt; Sent: Monday, November 23,</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 13:20:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10481</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Power change 110 to 208v without downtime</title>
<description>Let us know if it works :-)  ________________________________ From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 12:40:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10480</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Power change 110 to 208v without downtime</title>
<description>My educated guess is that you can do this safely and for as long as you wish. The power supplies are pretty much independent of one another, and th</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 12:28:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10479</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Power change 110 to 208v without downtime</title>
<description>..shouldn&amp;#039;t be a problem. The low-side of the Power Supply is the same for both high-side voltages. So, assuming you&amp;#039;re plugging into a 208V power s</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 12:25:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10478</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Power change 110 to 208v without downtime</title>
<description>Well, they are auto-ranging power supplies. It should work. I was always told it is fine for a very short while, just don&amp;#039;t bet the bank on leaving it</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 12:09:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10477</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Power change 110 to 208v without downtime</title>
<description>I certainly would not be brave enough to try that. Not sure what having 208 on one side and 110 on the other would do, but seems like a potential for</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 11:59:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10476</link>
</item><item>
<title>Power change 110 to 208v without downtime</title>
<description>Our filers and shelves are currently on 110v power. We&amp;#039;d like to switch to 208v, possibly without downtime. I&amp;#039;m thinking of moving each power supply</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 11:31:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10475</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: vif create on the fly</title>
<description>I have done this before, but you may run into arp issues. I am not sure which MAC the VIF will take on. You may have to delete rarp caches in switches</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 04:43:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10474</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: vif create on the fly</title>
<description>Hey Steven On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 13:19, Steve Losen &amp;lt;scl@sasha.acc.virginia.edu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I am going to create a vif using two interfaces (e0a an</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 04:31:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10473</link>
</item><item>
<title>vif create on the fly</title>
<description>I am going to create a vif using two interfaces (e0a and e0c). The IP address of e0a is going to be the IP for the vif, e0c is not in use. I was hop</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 04:19:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10472</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: head count per storage</title>
<description>Very understandable. What I am looking for is if there is any research or documents available on this issue?    -----Original Message----- From: J</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 22:18:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10471</link>
</item><item>
<title>head count per storage</title>
<description>Hi all, IHAC who is looking for stats which could point to industry standards mentioning the head counts (engineers) required per amount of storage (</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 21:26:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10470</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: SMVI Experiances</title>
<description>I can understand wanting to make your backup up method as reliable as possible but for most organizations I suspect that crash consistent backups meet</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 05:10:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10469</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Determining the current &amp;#039;snapmirror throttle&amp;#039; value?</title>
<description>You could open a case and ask for it to be linked to &amp;quot;Bug&amp;quot; number 315117. It has only one customer attached to it yet (not TEAC), and as an RFE may n</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 02:34:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10468</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: SMVI Experiances</title>
<description>We use it, and due it generally works OK.  However, getting quieced VMs isn&amp;#039;t as straight forward as you&amp;#039;d hope (especially for highly used VMs).  N</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 02:23:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10467</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: SMVI Experiances</title>
<description>Hi  Please take a look at TR 3737 . This is the best practices guide for SMVI 1.0. But this should get you started on some of the best practices for</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 20:46:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10466</link>
</item><item>
<title>SMVI Experiances</title>
<description>Hi all, Now our controller upgrade woes have been sorted I can start to play with the new stuff on our 2050. One of those is SMVI. Unfortunately as</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 13:09:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10465</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Determining the current &amp;#039;snapmirror throttle&amp;#039; value?</title>
<description>Sounds like an RFE for me. Richard D Borders CPR Escalations Engineer RTP, North Carolina USA - NetApp, Inc. Email: rborders@netapp.com Phone:(919) 4</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 07:57:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10464</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Determining the current &amp;#039;snapmirror throttle&amp;#039; value?</title>
<description>Leimann&amp;gt; Perhaps a silly question, but if &amp;quot;you&amp;quot; are doing the throttle Leimann&amp;gt; change, then why are you not logging that yourself for future Leimann&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 07:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10463</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Determining the current &amp;#039;snapmirror throttle&amp;#039; value?</title>
<description>Perhaps a silly question, but if &amp;quot;you&amp;quot; are doing the throttle change, then why are you not logging that yourself for future reference ? Script the thi</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 07:26:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10462</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Determining the current &amp;#039;snapmirror throttle&amp;#039; value?</title>
<description>That only works if the snapmirror was scheduled. If it was started manually (or a scheduled snapmirror was aborted and restarted manually) I don&amp;#039;t kn</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 16:58:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10457</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
