<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Netapp | toasters</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>13 Feb  2012 03:44:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Flash Cache questions: symmetrical cache mode required? Metadata mode only with a 512GB Flash Cache?</title>
<description>On Feb 6, 2012, at 4:10 PM, Jeff Mohler &amp;lt;speedtoys.racing@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; IMHO, that means that in the much smaller cards, going ONE way or the o</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 11:24:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11834</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: tracking aggr initialization progress ?</title>
<description>aggr status -r or aggr status -s if the disks are still showing in the spares pool. On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Klise, Steve &amp;lt;klises@sutterhealt</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 15:16:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11832</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: tracking aggr initialization progress ?</title>
<description>Hi All, This is neto from Brazil How are you? Please use sysconfig -r All the best neto NetApp - I love this company! On Feb 10, 2012, at 6:04 P</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 15:09:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11833</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: tracking aggr initialization progress ?</title>
<description>Disks need to be cleared if they were not zero&amp;#039;ed. Look at your disks (don&amp;#039;t have the command handy) or look in filer view and I bet some are zero&amp;#039;ing</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 14:51:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11831</link>
</item><item>
<title>tracking aggr initialization progress ?</title>
<description>Is there a way to track the progress (% complete?) for aggr creation/initialization? aggr status      Aggr State      Status      Op</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 14:38:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11830</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: The following prevents offline of volume: zapi snapshot list</title>
<description>The snapshot process must have completed - I was able to offline by waiting a few minutes thanks Fletcher  On Feb 10, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Parisi, Jus</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 14:35:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11829</link>
</item><item>
<title>The following prevents offline of volume: zapi snapshot list</title>
<description>Hi I&amp;#039;m attempting to offline all the volumes on this 64bit aggr so I can destroy and re-create as 32 bit (so 32-&amp;gt;32 bit data motion is supported) I</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 13:57:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11828</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: dedup changed in 8.1?</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Day2 after the 8.1RC2 upgrade - &amp;gt; All quiet on the (disabled) dedup front - will need to engage the lead engineers on this one since we like the ded</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 04:49:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11827</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: dedup changed in 8.1?</title>
<description>Day2 after the 8.1RC2 upgrade - All quiet on the (disabled) dedup front - will need to engage the lead engineers on this one since we like the dedup s</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 23:41:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11826</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: pam card question/issue</title>
<description>Ya. Just a bad block or something.  Pam is not your primary block home anyways.  Not worth downtime.  . On Feb 9, 2012, at 10:04 AM, &amp;quot;Klise, Ste</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 10:48:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11825</link>
</item><item>
<title>nfsstats help</title>
<description>How do I find out what&amp;#039;s causing these messages and what the severity is? With large chunks taken out: Server rpc: TCP: calls    badcalls  nullr</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 10:29:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11824</link>
</item><item>
<title>pam card question/issue</title>
<description>Just thought I would put this out there..  Couple days ago, started seeing these errors in my message file.. Opened the case with support, and they s</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 10:04:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11823</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: dedup changed in 8.1?</title>
<description>Id grab a lot more data, than CPU use...which indicates very little on it&amp;#039;s own. I agree you had a problem, but CPU % wasn&amp;#039;t the cause. Say hi to Vi</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 09:49:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11822</link>
</item><item>
<title>dedup changed in 8.1?</title>
<description>Last night (first since the upgrade from 7.3.5.1P2 to 8.1RC2) we experienced much higher load on our 3270 cluster and some VM timeouts coinciding with</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 09:40:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11821</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Force 64bit aggr migration</title>
<description>There is a way... But not supported.. :-) The only supported way is by adding disks... Commands below were executed in diag mode (priv set diag)  on</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 08:58:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11820</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Fas 3240 failover delay</title>
<description>Thnk you all for your answers. They are all very helpfull The problem i am facing occurs from the time the one node falls and the surving node starts</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 05:40:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11819</link>
</item><item>
<title>AW: Fas 3240 failover delay</title>
<description>Hi Tim, you&amp;#039;re the man of the week ;) It&amp;#039;s a shame, but i forgot to check this. Thanks for your help! greets Steffen  -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 01:36:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11817</link>
</item><item>
<title>AW: NDU from 7.3.5.1P3 to 8.1RC2 completed</title>
<description>Hi,   we&amp;#039;ll use VAAI, too (especially for cloning). I&amp;#039;m not sure, but i read that VAAI works with Ontap 8.01, so there is no reason for me to update</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 01:33:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11818</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Force 64bit aggr migration</title>
<description>That would work...or if a non-guaranteed migration is ok you can also just run vfiler migrate from the command line of the target system. When the mir</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 23:10:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11815</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: vfiler migrate: overview and thoughts</title>
<description>Correct.. between 2 nodes in the same cluster. -----Original Message----- From: Borzenkov, Andrey [mailto:andrey.borzenkov@ts.fujitsu.com] Sent: Wed</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 23:09:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11816</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Force 64bit aggr migration</title>
<description>This just occurred to me - a plan forward to allow data motion and migration to 64 bit I will test it asap, but basically its this since vfiler mig</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 19:33:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11814</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Force 64bit aggr migration</title>
<description>As of now there is no known method to do it. ________________________________________ From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [toasters-bounces@teaparty.n</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 19:24:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11813</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: vfiler migrate: overview and thoughts</title>
<description>&amp;quot;does not work between cluster pairs&amp;quot; - you mean &amp;quot;between heads in cluster pair&amp;quot;? May be these are subtleties of English language that non-native spea</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 19:02:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11812</link>
</item><item>
<title>Force 64bit aggr migration</title>
<description>Anyone know if its possible to force the in place 32-&amp;gt;64bit aggr non-disruptive migration without having to add disk? I&amp;#039;m running into a 8.1R2 data m</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 15:37:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11811</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: vfiler migrate: overview and thoughts</title>
<description>Really good discussion here. You are using the -m nocopy method which is a method with disk reassign. This does not work from NMC. NMC is data moti</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 11:59:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/11810</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

