<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Netapp | toasters</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>08 Nov  2009 03:55:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>SnapDrive 6 &amp;amp; Windows 2008 - can&amp;#039;t see or connect disks in SD but can see them in Disk Management MMC - only mount read-only</title>
<description>Hi, Another question - I have a datawarehouse box - has 4 luns -&amp;gt; SD 6.1 and Server 2k8 both 64bit. I can&amp;#039;t seem to reconnect the LUN&amp;#039;s using the SD</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 18:26:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10441</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Controller upgrade complete but . . .</title>
<description>&amp;gt; I believe that happens if you first bring the aggregates online in maintenance mode, &amp;gt; rather than in normal mode. Maintenance mode will strip all</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 14:01:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10440</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Controller upgrade complete but . . .</title>
<description>I believe that happens if you first bring the aggregates online in maintenance mode, rather than in normal mode. Maintenance mode will strip all the</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 10:14:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10439</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Controller upgrade complete but . . .</title>
<description>Hi Peter, That sounds fairly plausible - the upgrade itself was performed by a vendor and the upgrade steps we used in our change control look like t</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 09:57:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10438</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Controller upgrade complete but . . .</title>
<description>It sounds to me like the root volume from the factory was used and the setup routine was run, rather than removing the new drives, connecting the old</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 09:23:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10437</link>
</item><item>
<title>Controller upgrade complete but . . .</title>
<description>Hi all, Hoping you can save me some legwork - We&amp;#039;ve upgraded our 270c to a 2050ha - data looks good. We did run into the lun signaturing issue with</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 01:40:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10436</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: SMVI / VMWare Experiences...</title>
<description>If you don&amp;#039;t get VMWare snapshots in your SMVI process then your backups would be inconsistent. So conceptually the restore would be akin to a tradit</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 08:47:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10435</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: SMVI / VMWare Experiences...</title>
<description>Thanks for all your answers... We made some tests yesterday with esx4 and cloning and snapshotting... It seems that the challenge is not because of</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 00:59:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10434</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: SMVI / VMWare Experiences...</title>
<description>Data ONTap version should read 7.3.1.1p7.  -----Original Message----- From: Ken Williams Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 9:21 AM To: &amp;#039;Steffen Kamme</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 09:52:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10433</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: SMVI / VMWare Experiences...</title>
<description>Yes, we have the same issue. Came down to a few things: 1. Update to 7.3.2p7. There are algorithm changes to WAFL that help with VMFS/VMDK reading/w</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 09:21:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/10432</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
