<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Nessus | plugins</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 16:07:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Fixes to nmap.nasl</title>
<description>Hello! Here&amp;#039;s the fixes against nmap.nasl found on this link: http://www.nessus.org/documentation/nmap.nasl Here&amp;#039;s the link to the diff (it&amp;#039;s in att</description>
<pubDate>14 Mar  2009 04:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33747</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: False positive in frontpage_chunked_overflow.nasl</title>
<description>On Mar 10, 2009, at 11:12 PM, nnposter@users.sourceforge.net wrote: &amp;gt; Plugin frontpage_chunked_overflow.nasl (version 1.18) reports a false &amp;gt; positiv</description>
<pubDate>13 Mar  2009 08:25:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33746</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending the generic web application	vulnerability checks</title>
<description>Hi Piet, &amp;gt; I have the following questions: &amp;gt; 2. What is the development roadmap for these kind of checks? There is no firm roadmap for more applic</description>
<pubDate>12 Mar  2009 02:41:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33745</link>
</item><item>
<title>False positive in frontpage_chunked_overflow.nasl</title>
<description>Plugin frontpage_chunked_overflow.nasl (version 1.18) reports a false positive if the IIS web server is configured not to return 404.  The following</description>
<pubDate>10 Mar  2009 20:12:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33744</link>
</item><item>
<title>Low severity and CVSS score in ssh1_proto_enabled.nasl</title>
<description>Plugin ssh1_proto_enabled.nasl (version 1.18) rates CVE-2001-0361 as Low with CVSS 2.6, which seems rather odd, especially considering that it shoul</description>
<pubDate>10 Mar  2009 20:12:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33743</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending the generic web application vulnerability checks</title>
<description>On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:47:59 +0000 Piet Haanstra &amp;lt;10109@live.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; 1. Are there more generic web application vulnerability checks that &amp;gt; I mi</description>
<pubDate>10 Mar  2009 09:50:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33742</link>
</item><item>
<title>Extending the generic web application vulnerability checks</title>
<description>Hello all, I am currently investigating the possibilities of Nessus with regards to testing web applications on generic vulnerabilities. My goal is t</description>
<pubDate>09 Mar  2009 07:47:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33741</link>
</item><item>
<title>CanSecWest 2009 Speakers and Dojo courses (Mar 14-20)</title>
<description>Final Speaker Lineup for CanSecWest 2009 (March 18-20): =============================================== The Smart-Phones Nightmare - Sergio &amp;#039;shadown&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>15 Feb  2009 18:52:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33716</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: setting to disable a plugin by default</title>
<description>Perhaps you are correct that it is more of a user training issue than  anything, or I should make a new family for inverse logic plugins, so  they d</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2009 07:43:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33711</link>
</item><item>
<title>Windows Compliance settings</title>
<description>Don&amp;#039;t know if this is the proper way to ask this but I&amp;#039;m in the process of trying to convince MGMT to utilize nessus Windows compliance .audit file</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2009 06:45:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33710</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: setting to disable a plugin by default</title>
<description>Doug Nordwall wrote: &amp;gt; is there a setting for plugins to disable them by default? the nikto.nasl &amp;gt; has a nice checkbox.. any other way? I have one wit</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2009 06:33:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33709</link>
</item><item>
<title>openssh 50.nasl and paranoia</title>
<description>I have just run Nessus with the paranoid option against three systems. I believe all three are instances of Firewall-1 (ports 264/tcp and 500/udp open</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2009 09:48:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33706</link>
</item><item>
<title>setting to disable a plugin by default</title>
<description>is there a setting for plugins to disable them by default? the nikto.nasl has a nice checkbox.. any other way? I have one with reverse logic (errors i</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2009 08:22:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33705</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: writing new plugin</title>
<description>On Jan 30, 2009, at 7:47 PM, George A. Theall wrote: &amp;gt; We recommend using script IDs in the range 60000 - 62000 for plugins  &amp;gt; you might write for i</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2009 11:54:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33698</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: writing new plugin</title>
<description>On Jan 31, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Peter Van Eeckhoutte (corelan) wrote: &amp;gt; I am using checkbox, radio and entry fields in my plugin preferences &amp;gt; I would l</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2009 18:28:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33684</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Tenable patch superseded co relation</title>
<description>On Feb 3, 2009, at 6:35 AM, Renil Lambert wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; PFA. This contains the consolidated list of scans performed for a  &amp;gt; single subnet</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2009 05:14:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33682</link>
</item><item>
<title>Tenable patch superseded co relation</title>
<description>Hi guys,   PFA. This contains the consolidated list of scans performed for a single subnet last day. The items marked in RED have patch mismatch as</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2009 21:35:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33681</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: nasl question : split and arrays</title>
<description>Great, thanks ! I have published my plugin on my blog... It basically is a wrapper/output parser for ike-scan, more info can be found at http://www.</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2009 17:13:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33678</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: nasl question : split and arrays</title>
<description>On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:29:32 +0100 &amp;quot;Peter Van Eeckhoutte (corelan)&amp;quot; &amp;lt;peter.ve@corelan.be&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; array1=split(mystring,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;); The separator is a na</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2009 07:30:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33677</link>
</item><item>
<title>nasl question : split and arrays</title>
<description>Hello, I have a string that looks like this mystring=&amp;quot;value1=1 value2=a value3=cd value4=jj&amp;quot;; I would like to be able to put this in individual arr</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2009 06:29:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33676</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: writing new plugin</title>
<description>Thanks - it works now I have another question I am using checkbox, radio and entry fields in my plugin preferences I would like to be able to allow</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2009 00:44:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33675</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: writing new plugin</title>
<description>On Jan 30, 2009, at 6:01 AM, Peter Van Eeckhoutte (corelan) wrote: &amp;gt; 1. When I run the plugin with nasl (at a command line), I get &amp;gt; &amp;quot;A non-authentic</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2009 16:47:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33674</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: writing new plugin</title>
<description>The nessusd.conf option did the trick Thanks   ____________________________________________________ Peter Van Eeckhoutte peter.ve@telenet.be - pet</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2009 09:25:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33673</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: writing new plugin</title>
<description>You can try the option nasl_no_signature_check option in nessud.conf And indeed non-signed plugins which use authenticated function won&amp;#039;t run by defau</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2009 07:10:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33671</link>
</item><item>
<title>writing new plugin</title>
<description>Hi all, I have started writing a new nessus plugin in nasl. 1. When I run the plugin with nasl (at a command line), I get &amp;quot;A non-authenticated scrip</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2009 03:01:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nessus/plugins/33670</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

