Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: NANOG: users

Att funkyness

 

 

NANOG users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


jeff.jjones at gmail

Aug 15, 2012, 7:17 AM

Post #1 of 9 (580 views)
Permalink
Att funkyness

Anyone seeing issues with AT&T and DNS resolution? Still troubleshooting, but wanted other input.

Thanks
~Jeff


shortdudey123 at gmail

Aug 15, 2012, 7:20 AM

Post #2 of 9 (562 views)
Permalink
Re: Att funkyness [In reply to]

What kind of circuit? residential? commercial? DNS server ip's?

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM, jeff jones <jeff.jjones [at] gmail> wrote:

> Anyone seeing issues with AT&T and DNS resolution? Still troubleshooting,
> but wanted other input.
>
> Thanks
> ~Jeff
>


justin.vocke at gmail

Aug 15, 2012, 7:34 AM

Post #3 of 9 (563 views)
Permalink
Re: Att funkyness [In reply to]

https://twitter.com/#!/search/AT%26T%20DNS

ATT is having some DNS issues on their backbone. There is currently no ETA
for resolution.


--
Justin Vocke





On 8/15/12 9:20 AM, "Grant Ridder" <shortdudey123 [at] gmail> wrote:

>What kind of circuit? residential? commercial? DNS server ip's?
>
>On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM, jeff jones <jeff.jjones [at] gmail> wrote:
>
>> Anyone seeing issues with AT&T and DNS resolution? Still
>>troubleshooting,
>> but wanted other input.
>>
>> Thanks
>> ~Jeff
>>


shortdudey123 at gmail

Aug 15, 2012, 7:43 AM

Post #4 of 9 (561 views)
Permalink
Re: Att funkyness [In reply to]

I have ATT DSL at home and the DNS servers (68.94.156.1 and 68.94.157.1)
pushed from ATT work fine.

-Grant

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Justin Vocke <justin.vocke [at] gmail>wrote:

> https://twitter.com/#!/search/AT%26T%20DNS
>
> ATT is having some DNS issues on their backbone. There is currently no ETA
> for resolution.
>
>
> --
> Justin Vocke
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/15/12 9:20 AM, "Grant Ridder" <shortdudey123 [at] gmail> wrote:
>
> >What kind of circuit? residential? commercial? DNS server ip's?
> >
> >On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM, jeff jones <jeff.jjones [at] gmail>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Anyone seeing issues with AT&T and DNS resolution? Still
> >>troubleshooting,
> >> but wanted other input.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> ~Jeff
> >>
>
>
>


mikea at mikea

Aug 15, 2012, 7:48 AM

Post #5 of 9 (561 views)
Permalink
Re: Att funkyness [In reply to]

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:43:02AM -0500, Grant Ridder wrote:
> I have ATT DSL at home and the DNS servers (68.94.156.1 and 68.94.157.1)
> pushed from ATT work fine.
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Justin Vocke <justin.vocke [at] gmail>wrote:
>
> > https://twitter.com/#!/search/AT%26T%20DNS
> >
> > ATT is having some DNS issues on their backbone. There is currently no ETA
> > for resolution.
> >
> > On 8/15/12 9:20 AM, "Grant Ridder" <shortdudey123 [at] gmail> wrote:
> >
> > >What kind of circuit? residential? commercial? DNS server ip's?
> > >
> > >On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM, jeff jones <jeff.jjones [at] gmail>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Anyone seeing issues with AT&T and DNS resolution? Still
> > >>troubleshooting,
> > >> but wanted other input.

We saw about an hour of funky behavior on one of the outbound mailservers,
trying to get mail to some commercial sites, but that appears to have been
resolved. All good now. I hope.

--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mikea [at] mikea
Tired old sysadmin


blakjak at blakjak

Aug 15, 2012, 12:41 PM

Post #6 of 9 (499 views)
Permalink
Re: Att funkyness [In reply to]

Yep. 'no servers could be reached' for at least one domain that's hosted
with them that i've come across.

Appears to have been the case for >6 hours as of about 30 minutes ago,
but just retested, fault appears to have cleared.


On 16/08/12 02:17, jeff jones wrote:
> Anyone seeing issues with AT&T and DNS resolution? Still troubleshooting, but wanted other input.
>
> Thanks
> ~Jeff


phil at cluestick

Aug 15, 2012, 7:46 PM

Post #7 of 9 (494 views)
Permalink
Re: Att funkyness [In reply to]

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Mark Foster <blakjak [at] blakjak> wrote:
> Yep. 'no servers could be reached' for at least one domain that's hosted
> with them that i've come across.
>
> Appears to have been the case for >6 hours as of about 30 minutes ago,
> but just retested, fault appears to have cleared.


I followed up with this on the outages@ list. Started clearing up for
us about 3:30PM EDT. However, I don't see any update from AT&T.
Message has been basically the same all day.

http://www.attens.com/customers/outages.shtml

phil


tom.taylor.stds at gmail

Aug 16, 2012, 9:18 AM

Post #8 of 9 (485 views)
Permalink
Re: Att funkyness [In reply to]

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/081512-atampt-suffers-dns-261673.html?hpg1=bn

Continuing DDOS attack knocked out some DNS servers.

On 15/08/2012 10:46 PM, Phil Dyer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Mark Foster <blakjak [at] blakjak> wrote:
>> Yep. 'no servers could be reached' for at least one domain that's hosted
>> with them that i've come across.
>>
>> Appears to have been the case for >6 hours as of about 30 minutes ago,
>> but just retested, fault appears to have cleared.
>
>
> I followed up with this on the outages@ list. Started clearing up for
> us about 3:30PM EDT. However, I don't see any update from AT&T.
> Message has been basically the same all day.
>
> http://www.attens.com/customers/outages.shtml
>
> phil
>
>


virendra.rode at gmail

Aug 16, 2012, 12:30 PM

Post #9 of 9 (482 views)
Permalink
Re: Att funkyness [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

What baffles me is that we have external sources reporting the status
as opposed to the provider. In all fairness there's a list of others
right behind.

Their their status page has been static as a sticky bit & sealed
harder than woodpecker lips.


regards,
/virendra


On 08/16/2012 09:18 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/081512-atampt-suffers-dns-261673.html?hpg1=bn
>
>
>
>
> Continuing DDOS attack knocked out some DNS servers.
>
> On 15/08/2012 10:46 PM, Phil Dyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Mark Foster
>> <blakjak [at] blakjak> wrote:
>>> Yep. 'no servers could be reached' for at least one domain
>>> that's hosted with them that i've come across.
>>>
>>> Appears to have been the case for >6 hours as of about 30
>>> minutes ago, but just retested, fault appears to have cleared.
>>
>>
>> I followed up with this on the outages@ list. Started clearing
>> up for us about 3:30PM EDT. However, I don't see any update from
>> AT&T. Message has been basically the same all day.
>>
>> http://www.attens.com/customers/outages.shtml
>>
>> phil
>>
>>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlAtSmwACgkQ3HuimOHfh+HXfwD+KPpzxz+rHez58vr+5dYNUGBY
kim6QbLhN7c2pHxA1LEBAIxNtvF/nXZcywr2JrTkd7hZm16hRRwTMyeaQ2BONAml
=hhjA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

NANOG users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.