Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: NANOG: users

minimizing BGP link failure detection time

 

 

NANOG users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


mailinglist at bangky

Mar 30, 2008, 7:54 AM

Post #1 of 1 (642 views)
Permalink
minimizing BGP link failure detection time

Hi all,

I'm currently getting started out with BGP so if I'm asking the obvious,
please forgive my ignorance.

On the topic of BGP convergence, may I ask what are the current best
practices for ensuring rapid link failure detection - especially when
dealing with an interface that is connected to 3rd party L2
infrastructure? e.g. an interface connected to an EBGP peer via Metro-E

As far as I'm aware, the most commonly used method to minimize link
failure detection time is to tune the keepalive/hold timers. I
understand that there are alternatives to this such as BFD and next hop
tracking - but support for this is limited on certain platforms.

I have looked through this presentation from APNIC 21.
http://www.apnic.net/meetings/21/docs/sigs/routing/routing-pres-hughes-bgp.pdf

What do you guys think of the recommendation for timers? (5s and 15s for
keepalive and hold timers respectively). However, since the presentation
is more than a year old, has BFD become a better solution to this?

Looking forward to your suggestions.

Thanks
--
ANG Kah Yik (bangky)

NANOG users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.