<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>NANOG | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 08:22:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>couple of questions regarding &amp;#039;lifeline&amp;#039; and large scale nat...</title>
<description>We&amp;#039;re toying with the idea of a low bitrate &amp;#039;lifeline&amp;#039; internet on our cable system, maybe even bundled with a certain level of cable service. First</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 13:19:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149731</link>
</item><item>
<title>Iran blocking essentially all encyrpted protocols</title>
<description>Haven&amp;#039;t seen this come through on NANOG yet: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/02/iran-reportedly-blocking-encrypted-internet-traffic.ars</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 10:26:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149711</link>
</item><item>
<title>PGP, S/MIME + SSL cross-reference (Was: Dear RIPE: Please don&amp;#039;t encourage phishing)</title>
<description>On 2012-02-10 18:37 , Leo Bicknell wrote: [..] &amp;gt; There&amp;#039;s no reason my mail client shouldn&amp;#039;t validate the signed e-mail &amp;gt; came from the same entity as</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 09:46:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149703</link>
</item><item>
<title>Dear RIPE: Please don&amp;#039;t encourage phishing</title>
<description>I received the enclosed note, apparently from RIPE (and the headers check out). Why are you sending messages with clickable objects that I&amp;#039;m supposed</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 08:56:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149694</link>
</item><item>
<title>Middlebox Report and Thank You!</title>
<description>Hello NANOG! I emailed you a few months ago asking for help understanding typical middlebox deployments in enterprise networks. 57 of you responded -</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 17:01:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149689</link>
</item><item>
<title>BGP history in enterprise?</title>
<description>Looking for something to keep track of BGP route changes in a large enterprise. Found http://www.ibgplay.org/, but I can&amp;#039;t seem to get in touch with t</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 20:54:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149672</link>
</item><item>
<title>Slow IN-ADDR.ARPA responses</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m seeing surprisingly slow responses from some of the IN-ADDR servers, like 300ms or more. Are they being attacked by script kiddies of something?</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 18:03:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149668</link>
</item><item>
<title>2012.02.08 NANOG54 day 3 morning session notes</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve posted my notes from this morning&amp;#039;s session at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.08-nanog54-morning-session.txt I wonder if perhaps we don&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 12:46:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149663</link>
</item><item>
<title>remote participation - IETF sidr wg interim meeting</title>
<description>A WebEx session has been arranged for remote participation in the interim sidr meeting Thu 9 Mar. Below is the WebEx announcement of the meeting. --</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 10:49:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149653</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 explicit BGP group configs</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m prepping an environment for v6 and I&amp;#039;m wondering what, if any, benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups.  We&amp;#039;re running</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 08:59:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149646</link>
</item><item>
<title>2012.02.07 NANOG54 day 2 notes, afternoon session</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m so sorry; I thought I would have time to send these out after the peering track, but I got pulled into some conversations which ended up lasting u</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 00:05:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149628</link>
</item><item>
<title>Anyone from Kraus Electronic/CableTV lurking?</title>
<description>I tried to reach Kraus Electronic / Cable TV through various means. Anyone know how to reach their NOC? Theyıre announcing 12.198.32.0/20 (they only b</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 19:55:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149623</link>
</item><item>
<title>report botnet C&amp;amp;C?</title>
<description>Assuming it is not a futile/wasted effort, where is the current best place/resource to report an active botnet C&amp;amp;C to?</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 19:20:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149619</link>
</item><item>
<title>2011 Worldwide Infrastructure Report available for download.</title>
<description>[Apologies if you&amp;#039;ve already seen this announcement in other forums.] We&amp;#039;ve just posted the 2011 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report for downloa</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 17:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149616</link>
</item><item>
<title>Firewalls in service provider environments</title>
<description>All, Looking for some recommendations on firewall placement in service provider environments. I&amp;#039;m of the school of thought that in my SP network I d</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 13:31:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149604</link>
</item><item>
<title>2012.02.07 NANOG54 day 2 morning session notes</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve posted my notes from the morning session at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.07-nanog54-morning-session.txt for those who find them useful</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 13:01:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149603</link>
</item><item>
<title>issues with Level3 in NYC</title>
<description>Anybody having issues with peering with Level3 in NYC</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 11:43:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149600</link>
</item><item>
<title>DOS ATTACK ON BGP , LPTS ??</title>
<description>Hi , What is the best way to mitigate DOS attack against the bgp process of a router , is LPTS on IOS-XR enough ? Rgds Peter</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 22:37:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149587</link>
</item><item>
<title>2012.02.06 NANOG54 day1 afternoon session notes</title>
<description>My notes from the second half of today&amp;#039;s NANOG 54 talks are now up at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.06-nanog54-afternoon-session.txt for tho</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 18:04:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149582</link>
</item><item>
<title>Any Covad / MegaPath folks around?</title>
<description>Hi, Looks like the Connect portal has been down for hours. Can someone from Covad / MegaPath ping me off-list? Thanks! Sincerely, Bobby Glover Di</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 18:01:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149581</link>
</item><item>
<title>Switch and router</title>
<description>Hello There is big congestion between router and switch I read some documents about flowcontral Do I disable or adjust flowcontral at the same? Ca</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 13:41:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149577</link>
</item><item>
<title>2012.02.06 NANOG54 monday morning session notes are up</title>
<description>I posted my notes from this morning&amp;#039;s session at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.06-nanog54-morning-session.txt in case people find them to be</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 12:51:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149576</link>
</item><item>
<title>Optimal IPv6 router</title>
<description>Hi, Most routers today are basically IPv4 routers, with IPv6 thrown in. They are however designed keeping IPv4 in mind. With IPv6 growing, if we wer</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 17:20:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149532</link>
</item><item>
<title>Superbowl traffic.</title>
<description>(yeah, i used a (C) term , so sue me) akam reporting ~17M hits/sec.. anyone seeing clearly identifiable traffic spikes (presumably due to sb)? reply</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 15:48:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149523</link>
</item><item>
<title>UDP port 80 DDoS attack</title>
<description>We just saw a huge flux of traffic occur this morning that spiked one of our upstream ISPs gear and killed the layer 2 link on another becuase of a DD</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 15:36:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149522</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

