Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 23 Nov 2009 09:50:08 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Bill Woodcock wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > % whois -h whois.ripe.net AS1712 > > as-name: FR-RENAT 23 Nov 2009 08:06:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120049 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > % whois -h whois.ripe.net AS1712 > as-name: FR-RENATER-ENST > > % whois -h w 23 Nov 2009 07:41:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120048 * Jeffrey Lyon: > Looks like FR-RENATER-ENST is in the wrong: > > 1708-1728 Assigned by ARIN whois.arin.net > (source: http:/ 23 Nov 2009 07:19:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120047 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:13:58AM -0500, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net> wrote a message of 42 lines which said: > Looks like FR-RENAT 23 Nov 2009 07:18:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120046 Looks like FR-RENATER-ENST is in the wrong: 1708-1728 Assigned by ARIN whois.arin.net (source: http://www.iana.org/assignment 23 Nov 2009 07:13:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120045 % whois -h whois.ripe.net AS1712 aut-num: AS1712 as-name: FR-RENATER-ENST descr: Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunicat 23 Nov 2009 07:10:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120044 Hi, I'm seeking someone at GLBX who can assist me with an issue we've been having, all attempts at resolution via customer service/trouble tickets (u 23 Nov 2009 06:02:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120043 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Scott Howard <scott@doc.net.au> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:38 AM, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote: > >> > 22 Nov 2009 20:52:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120042 On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > Since this plays nicely with eap-tls, 802.1x. ike, ssl/tls, and s/mime > it seems like a shoe-in, once you 22 Nov 2009 10:55:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120041 Ditto (puck.nether.net +9). Thanks on behalf of everyone, Jared. For those wanting further diversity, I also recommend using any or all of: everydn 22 Nov 2009 07:26:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120040 On Nov 21, 2009, at 8:54 PM, Phil Vandry wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:31:53 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote: >> I will correct this later. > > I saw tha 22 Nov 2009 05:06:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120039 We lost a cabinet in this about 25 minutes ago, anyone else effected? -- Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net | http://www.blac 21 Nov 2009 23:17:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120038 cards and tokens are a proxy for the use of a certificate authentication system... You can in fact do certificate auth without the use of cards or to 21 Nov 2009 20:24:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120037 is there a freebsd pam tacacs+ hack? randy 21 Nov 2009 19:58:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120036 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:38 AM, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote: > > Are passwords still the only lowest-common-denominator? > > There's OpenID, 21 Nov 2009 19:45:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120035 On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:31:53 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote: > I will correct this later. I saw that the FAQ is updated but maybe there is one small thing 21 Nov 2009 17:54:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120034 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Thom Hooker <thomh@smx.co.nz> wrote: > Hi > > Could a Yahoo! mail admin contact me off-list please? > > We have been 21 Nov 2009 16:32:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120033 Hi Could a Yahoo! mail admin contact me off-list please? We have been getting "421 Temporarily deferred" messages from Yahoo! for the past 48 hours 21 Nov 2009 15:01:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120032 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:58:27PM -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: > So it works as a standalone password vault also? I don't know. My only experience wi 21 Nov 2009 14:28:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120031 So it works as a standalone password vault also? Jeff On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 21 Nov 2009 13:58:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120030 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:06:48PM -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: > I was pretty excited about this post until I found out that myvidoop > only works on o 21 Nov 2009 13:55:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120029 I was pretty excited about this post until I found out that myvidoop only works on older version of FF. Jeff On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Matth 21 Nov 2009 13:06:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120028 [Sightly off-topic - solution specific] Some European countries have long figured out logistics of smartcard distribution and management in their heal 21 Nov 2009 12:45:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120027 Sadly, passwords are the least common denominator. The biggest problems with 2 factor devices (smart cards, OTPs, etc) is having to buy, configure, a 21 Nov 2009 10:40:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120026 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 02:38:32PM -0000, John Levine wrote: > > Are passwords still the only lowest-common-denominator? > > There's OpenID, where a 21 Nov 2009 09:31:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/120025