<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>NANOG | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 17:01:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>couple of questions regarding &amp;#039;lifeline&amp;#039; and large scale nat...</title>
<description>We&amp;#039;re toying with the idea of a low bitrate &amp;#039;lifeline&amp;#039; internet on our cable system, maybe even bundled with a certain level of cable service. First</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 13:19:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149731</link>
</item><item>
<title>Iran blocking essentially all encyrpted protocols</title>
<description>Haven&amp;#039;t seen this come through on NANOG yet: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/02/iran-reportedly-blocking-encrypted-internet-traffic.ars</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 10:26:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149711</link>
</item><item>
<title>PGP, S/MIME + SSL cross-reference (Was: Dear RIPE: Please don&amp;#039;t encourage phishing)</title>
<description>On 2012-02-10 18:37 , Leo Bicknell wrote: [..] &amp;gt; There&amp;#039;s no reason my mail client shouldn&amp;#039;t validate the signed e-mail &amp;gt; came from the same entity as</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 09:46:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149703</link>
</item><item>
<title>Dear RIPE: Please don&amp;#039;t encourage phishing</title>
<description>I received the enclosed note, apparently from RIPE (and the headers check out). Why are you sending messages with clickable objects that I&amp;#039;m supposed</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 08:56:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149694</link>
</item><item>
<title>Middlebox Report and Thank You!</title>
<description>Hello NANOG! I emailed you a few months ago asking for help understanding typical middlebox deployments in enterprise networks. 57 of you responded -</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 17:01:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149689</link>
</item><item>
<title>BGP history in enterprise?</title>
<description>Looking for something to keep track of BGP route changes in a large enterprise. Found http://www.ibgplay.org/, but I can&amp;#039;t seem to get in touch with t</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 20:54:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149672</link>
</item><item>
<title>Slow IN-ADDR.ARPA responses</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m seeing surprisingly slow responses from some of the IN-ADDR servers, like 300ms or more. Are they being attacked by script kiddies of something?</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 18:03:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149668</link>
</item><item>
<title>2012.02.08 NANOG54 day 3 morning session notes</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve posted my notes from this morning&amp;#039;s session at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.08-nanog54-morning-session.txt I wonder if perhaps we don&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 12:46:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149663</link>
</item><item>
<title>remote participation - IETF sidr wg interim meeting</title>
<description>A WebEx session has been arranged for remote participation in the interim sidr meeting Thu 9 Mar. Below is the WebEx announcement of the meeting. --</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 10:49:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149653</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 explicit BGP group configs</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m prepping an environment for v6 and I&amp;#039;m wondering what, if any, benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups.  We&amp;#039;re running</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 08:59:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149646</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

