<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>NANOG | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>08 Nov  2009 10:44:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Failover how much complexity will it add?</title>
<description>adel@baklawasecrets.com wrote: &amp;gt; Thanks for all your comments guys. With regards to bgp I did &amp;gt; think about placing two bgp routers in front of the s</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 10:19:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/119659</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Failover how much complexity will it add?</title>
<description>Seth Mattinen [sethm@rollernet.us] said: &amp;gt;Forget all of that and just multihome to two separate providers with BGP --Assuming that you&amp;#039;re advertising</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 10:09:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/119658</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Failover how much complexity will it add?</title>
<description>Thanks for all your comments guys. With regards to bgp I did think about placing two bgp routers in front of the ssg&amp;#039;s. However my limited understan</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 09:34:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/119657</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Failover how much complexity will it add?</title>
<description>On 2009-11-08-10:23:41, Blake Pfankuch &amp;lt;bpfankuch@cpgreeley.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Make sure they operate their own network for last mile [...] &amp;gt; I wouldn&amp;#039;t sw</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 09:29:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/119656</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Failover how much complexity will it add?</title>
<description>adel@baklawasecrets.com wrote: &amp;gt; HI, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I was recently brought onto a project where some failover is desired, but I think that the number of connect</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 09:23:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/119655</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Human Factors and Accident reduction/mitigation</title>
<description>Anton Kapela wrote: &amp;gt; What curve must we shift to get routers with hardware and software &amp;gt; that&amp;#039;s both a) fast b) reliable and c) cheap -- in the hope</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 08:51:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/119654</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Human Factors and Accident reduction/mitigation</title>
<description>Owen, &amp;gt; We could learn a lot about this from Aviation.  Nowhere in human history has &amp;gt; more research, care, training, and discipline been applied to</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 08:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/119653</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Failover how much complexity will it add?</title>
<description>adel@baklawasecrets.com wrote: &amp;gt; HI, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Now I couldn&amp;#039;t get any good answers as to why Internet connections 1 and 2 need to be separate. I think th</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 07:47:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/119652</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Failover how much complexity will it add?</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; -----Original Message----- &amp;gt;&amp;gt; From: adel@baklawasecrets.com [mailto:adel@baklawasecrets.com] &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 4:52 AM &amp;gt;&amp;gt; To: n</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 07:23:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/119651</link>
</item><item>
<title>Failover how much complexity will it add?</title>
<description>HI, I was recently brought onto a project where some failover is desired, but I think that the number of connections provisioned is excessive. Also</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 03:51:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/119650</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
