
scram69 at gmail
Jun 10, 2012, 10:18 PM
Post #36 of 47
(1395 views)
Permalink
|
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard <jyavenard [at] gmail> wrote: > Hi > > > On Sunday, 10 June 2012, scram69 wrote: >> >> >> Hi Jean-Yves, >> >> Would you recommend this build for all older (Core 2 Duo) macs? >> > > From what I tested, 32 bits code on a core 2 duo runs faster than 64 bits.. > So yes, on those machines I would recommend using this 32 bits build. Or you > could use a universal build and force 32 bits mode. > I found that using the carbon version (with Quartz video) doesn't help at > all. > Interestingly, on a new i5, i7 versions, 64 bits runs quite a bit faster > than the equivalent 32 bits code, almost 14% more fps on the same media > > >> >> If so, should we create a new profile with no processing, as is >> described in the ticket, or should we just use VDA Normal? >> > VDA doesn't do interlaced video properly, at best it plays crap, at worse > you get a kernel panic... So if your primary intent is to play interlaced > video, no point in select a VDA profile. > > _______________________________________________ > mythtv-users mailing list > mythtv-users [at] mythtv > http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users > Thanks. This build (using Normal profile) does use less CPU than the 64 bit build from source forge. However, for this build, playback seems always to default to a forced 4:3 aspect ratio. The only way I could figure around it was to force 16:9 aspect ratio in the playback settings. Had you noticed this? -- ________________________ "destroying the fundamental underpinnings of the broadcast television ecosystem" _______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list mythtv-users [at] mythtv http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
|