Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: MythTV: Users

HDHomerun signal strength required

 

 

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All MythTV users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


gull at gull

Feb 22, 2008, 12:37 PM

Post #26 of 36 (707 views)
Permalink
Re: HDHomerun signal strength required [In reply to]

On Feb 22, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Roger Heflin wrote:

> One thing that you can do, is test each antenna separately and note
> what
> channels each gets and how strong it is, if both together are worse
> than
> one single you know some canceling is going on.

Yes, and to amplify (heh heh) on what Brian said, phase-canceling is
very frequency dependent. If the canceled frequencies don't land on a
channel you care about, it's not a problem. If it does, you can shift
the canceled frequency just by changing the distance between the two
antennas by a few inches, or by turning them enough to put the
affected channel in the null of one of the antennas.

All antenna work contains some measure of "cut and try" because there
are so many real-world effects that are difficult to model. If you
can make it work well enough for your purposes, feel free to ignore
any math that says it shouldn't. ;)

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


ctreleaven at cogeco

Feb 22, 2008, 12:39 PM

Post #27 of 36 (780 views)
Permalink
Re: HDHomerun signal strength required [In reply to]

At 1:03 PM -0500 2/22/08, backuppc [at] sundquist wrote:
>I guess I'll be crawling around in my attic with my wireless laptop
>ssh-ed into my mythtv box checking signals and see what I can get just
>rotating the two antennae currently on the same mast. If nothing
>works reliably, I may have to break down and try Craig's suggesion and
>put a 4221 or 4228 on the roof this summer and see if the back-side
>approach works.

Any chance you can still return the Radio Shack antennas? If not, I'd try connecting one and see if it will receive enough out the back to get the channels you want.

SiliconDust provides a utility to work with the HDHomeRun that can help for testing reception. Do a full channel scan on one of the tuners, which will take several minutes, with:

hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF scan /tuner0 scan0.txt

Focus on the bits of interest with:

grep -B1 -A1 '8vsb' scan0.txt

Pick a channel that you want to optimize for and check your reception:

hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF set /tuner0/channel 8vsb:<channel/Hz>

hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF get /tuner0/status

Keep checking the status as you aim the antenna...

Craig
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


rogerheflin at gmail

Feb 22, 2008, 1:40 PM

Post #28 of 36 (708 views)
Permalink
Re: HDHomerun signal strength required [In reply to]

Craig Treleaven wrote:
> At 1:03 PM -0500 2/22/08, backuppc [at] sundquist wrote:
>> I guess I'll be crawling around in my attic with my wireless laptop
>> ssh-ed into my mythtv box checking signals and see what I can get just
>> rotating the two antennae currently on the same mast. If nothing
>> works reliably, I may have to break down and try Craig's suggesion and
>> put a 4221 or 4228 on the roof this summer and see if the back-side
>> approach works.
>
> Any chance you can still return the Radio Shack antennas? If not, I'd try connecting one and see if it will receive enough out the back to get the channels you want.
>
> SiliconDust provides a utility to work with the HDHomeRun that can help for testing reception. Do a full channel scan on one of the tuners, which will take several minutes, with:
>
> hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF scan /tuner0 scan0.txt
>
> Focus on the bits of interest with:
>
> grep -B1 -A1 '8vsb' scan0.txt
>
> Pick a channel that you want to optimize for and check your reception:
>
> hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF set /tuner0/channel 8vsb:<channel/Hz>
>
> hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF get /tuner0/status
>
> Keep checking the status as you aim the antenna...
>
> Craig
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users [at] mythtv
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>

If you were desperate enough, you could get one (or more) of these
and maybe get the channel changer to set it properly for each
channel, that would allow each channel to use the optimal antenna,
it would also require one of the "devices" for each input you wanted
to feed that way.

http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2049643&cp=&sr=1&origkw=antenna+switch&kw=antenna+switch&parentPage=search

On mine I checked the numbers I get combined and they are slightly
lower than best of either of the antenna's, but I only have a problem getting
one digital channel, and that should be pretty easy to fix since it is
a VHF channel so it easy to amplify separately without overamping the up rest
of the UHF channels. And I am only losing it when the weather is
really really bad.

Roger
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


newbury at mandamus

Feb 22, 2008, 3:38 PM

Post #29 of 36 (705 views)
Permalink
Re: HDHomerun signal strength required [In reply to]

Mike Perkins wrote:
> David Brodbeck wrote:
>> The best stuff I've found for waterproofing coaxial cable connectors is
>> a product called "Coax Seal". It's a putty that comes in a roll, like
>> tape. You wrap it around the connection and then mold it. I've had
>> bare copper fittings covered by this stuff up on a roof for 5 years and
>> they were still bright and shiny when I scraped it off.
>> I think Radio Shack still sells it; it's also commonly available from
>> places that sell amateur radio equipment.
>>
> In the UK I sourced some stuff which appears to be a cross between electrician's
> tape and soft rubber, called 'Self-Amalgamating Tape'. It may be called that on
> the other side of the pond, too.
>
> You wrap it around the joints, it's softer than Electrician's tape, so it moulds
> better. My joints easy last 5 years as well. Also gets used on pedal bike and
> car repairs, too.

You can find 'Self-Amalgamating' tape at marine chandleries under the
name 'Rigging Tape'. It is used to cover split pins, split rings and
other stuff in the rigging.
Much Much better than pvc electrician's tape on anything being left
outdoors.


Geoff
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


yan at seiner

Feb 22, 2008, 3:45 PM

Post #30 of 36 (710 views)
Permalink
Re: HDHomerun signal strength required [In reply to]

R. G. Newbury

> You can find 'Self-Amalgamating' tape at marine chandleries under the
> name 'Rigging Tape'. It is used to cover split pins, split rings and
> other stuff in the rigging.
> Much Much better than pvc electrician's tape on anything being left
> outdoors.

There's also a roofing tape glop. It comes in a roll maybe 3" wide, and
it's make to seal roof leaks. It's basically a thick, non-setting black
goop. You cut off a hunk with scissors, then mold it to whatever you want
to seal like childrens' putty, except it doesn't dry out and never sets.
You can peal it off later with no problems. Its biggest limitation is
that it needs to be warm when you use it.

--
Windows is like a canary in a coal mine, it's the first thing to die on
your network.

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


george_mythusers at mari1938

Feb 22, 2008, 5:54 PM

Post #31 of 36 (701 views)
Permalink
Re: HDHomerun signal strength required [In reply to]

Marc Sherman wrote:
> Craig Treleaven wrote:
>> I wonder if you could receive the south Buffalo transmitters through
>> the 'backside' of an antenna, like the CHannel Master 4221, and the
>> Grand Island and Toronto signals through the 'front'. These antennas
>> have a small lobe of reception off the back that may be quite
>> sufficient to pick up the 3 that are nearby to the south. Lots of
>> people in Toronto are using 4221's to receive Buffalo signals so the
>> reverse ought to work well for you. Diagram of the 4221 pickup
>> pattern is at:
>
> Another possibility: just wire the two inputs of the HDHR into two
> separate antennas, and only configure channels on each input in myth
> that you can receive well with that antenna. You won't get the same
> coverage that you'd normally expect from two identical tuners covering
> all the channels, but with the number of US programs re-broadcast on
> Canadian channels, you should come pretty close.
>
Since you already bought the Radio Shack antennas, I agree with Marc
here: aim one towards Grand Island, the other the opposite direction,
and hook each into one of the inputs of the HDHR. Then scan, and see
that you get all channels you expect from each direction.

Not saying any of the other ideas won't work, but I'm just thinking of
all the work and tweaking to get the other solutions working. I'd
rather be watching TV. :-)
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


msherman at projectile

Feb 22, 2008, 9:12 PM

Post #32 of 36 (702 views)
Permalink
Re: HDHomerun signal strength required [In reply to]

George Mari wrote:
>
> Since you already bought the Radio Shack antennas, I agree with Marc
> here: aim one towards Grand Island, the other the opposite direction,
> and hook each into one of the inputs of the HDHR. Then scan, and see
> that you get all channels you expect from each direction.

Just to be clear, he's aiming it towards the CN Tower -- the fact that
he'll pick up a few stations in Grand Island with the same antenna is
gravy. :)

- Marc in Toronto

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


backuppc at sundquist

Feb 23, 2008, 6:16 AM

Post #33 of 36 (691 views)
Permalink
Re: HDHomerun signal strength required [In reply to]

On Feb 22, 2008, 12:37 PM, gull wrote:

> On Feb 22, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Roger Heflin wrote:
>
> > One thing that you can do, is test each antenna separately and note
> > what channels each gets and how strong it is, if both together are
> > worse than one single you know some canceling is going on.
>
> Yes, and to amplify (heh heh) on what Brian said, phase-canceling is
> very frequency dependent. If the canceled frequencies don't land on a
> channel you care about, it's not a problem. If it does, you can shift
> the canceled frequency just by changing the distance between the two
> antennas by a few inches, or by turning them enough to put the
> affected channel in the null of one of the antennas.
>
> All antenna work contains some measure of "cut and try" because there
> are so many real-world effects that are difficult to model. If you can
> make it work well enough for your purposes, feel free to ignore any
> math that says it shouldn't. ;)

Yes, this is a great plan. I will try each antenna individually and
tweak the aim to get the best reception and then compare it to when both
are hooked up. If the signal is much weaker when combined, I will try
small adjustments to see of steer out of a null for the channels I need.
Maybe even set up a second attic mast and separate then laterally.

But first I am going to go out and enjoy some of that "bad weather" and
do some XC skiing today! (there goes my nerd credentials...)

On Feb 22, 2008, 12:39 PM Craig wrote:

> Any chance you can still return the Radio Shack antennas?

Too late now.

> If not, I'd try connecting one and see if it will receive enough out
> the back to get the channels you want.

After I get the best aim on the north/norhwest one, I'll see if I can
get the big ABC/CBS/NBC towers located not too far to the south out
the back of that same antenna.

> SiliconDust provides a utility to work with the HDHomeRun that can
> help for testing reception. Do a full channel scan on one of the
> tuners, which will take several minutes, with:
>
> hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF scan /tuner0 scan0.txt
>
> Focus on the bits of interest with:
>
> grep -B1 -A1 '8vsb' scan0.txt
>
> Pick a channel that you want to optimize for and check your reception:
>
> hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF set /tuner0/channel 8vsb:<channel/Hz>
>
> hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF get /tuner0/status
>
> Keep checking the status as you aim the antenna...

The pcHDTV came with two great utilties that I'll probably use. First
is dtvsignal. Here's the current output using my pcHDTV 5500:

user [at] mytht:~/dvb-atsc-tools-1.0.7$ ./dtvsignal 34
using '/dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0' and '/dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0'
tuning to 593000000 Hz
video pid 0x0021, audio pid 0x0024
dtvsignal ver 1.0.7 - by Jack Kelliher (c) 2002-2007
channel = 34 freq = 593000000Hz
30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
Signal: 048 ------------------------

(the signal bar on the last line is "live". Not doing too well on
channel 34 [Grand Island] today)

For comparison, here's CBC from the CN tower:

channel = 20 freq = 509000000Hz
30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
Signal: 011 -----

The other tool is dtvsnr:

Grand Island:

channel = 34 freq = 593000000Hz
dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
SNR: | | | | | |
SNR: 017 ============================

CN Tower:

channel = 20 freq = 509000000Hz
dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
SNR: | | | | | |
SNR: 003 --------------

The hills south of me:

channel = 38 freq = 617000000Hz
dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
SNR: | | | | | |
SNR: 026 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

I'll see what I can get tonight on these using just a single well-aimed
antenna and with each of the tuners.

Thanks again for all the help.

J.S.
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


rogerheflin at gmail

Feb 23, 2008, 11:57 AM

Post #34 of 36 (688 views)
Permalink
Re: HDHomerun signal strength required [In reply to]

backuppc [at] sundquist wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2008, 12:37 PM, gull wrote:
>
>> On Feb 22, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Roger Heflin wrote:
>>
>>> One thing that you can do, is test each antenna separately and note
>>> what channels each gets and how strong it is, if both together are
>>> worse than one single you know some canceling is going on.
>> Yes, and to amplify (heh heh) on what Brian said, phase-canceling is
>> very frequency dependent. If the canceled frequencies don't land on a
>> channel you care about, it's not a problem. If it does, you can shift
>> the canceled frequency just by changing the distance between the two
>> antennas by a few inches, or by turning them enough to put the
>> affected channel in the null of one of the antennas.
>>
>> All antenna work contains some measure of "cut and try" because there
>> are so many real-world effects that are difficult to model. If you can
>> make it work well enough for your purposes, feel free to ignore any
>> math that says it shouldn't. ;)
>
> Yes, this is a great plan. I will try each antenna individually and
> tweak the aim to get the best reception and then compare it to when both
> are hooked up. If the signal is much weaker when combined, I will try
> small adjustments to see of steer out of a null for the channels I need.
> Maybe even set up a second attic mast and separate then laterally.
>
> But first I am going to go out and enjoy some of that "bad weather" and
> do some XC skiing today! (there goes my nerd credentials...)
>
> On Feb 22, 2008, 12:39 PM Craig wrote:
>
>> Any chance you can still return the Radio Shack antennas?
>
> Too late now.
>
>> If not, I'd try connecting one and see if it will receive enough out
>> the back to get the channels you want.
>
> After I get the best aim on the north/norhwest one, I'll see if I can
> get the big ABC/CBS/NBC towers located not too far to the south out
> the back of that same antenna.
>
>> SiliconDust provides a utility to work with the HDHomeRun that can
>> help for testing reception. Do a full channel scan on one of the
>> tuners, which will take several minutes, with:
>>
>> hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF scan /tuner0 scan0.txt
>>
>> Focus on the bits of interest with:
>>
>> grep -B1 -A1 '8vsb' scan0.txt
>>
>> Pick a channel that you want to optimize for and check your reception:
>>
>> hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF set /tuner0/channel 8vsb:<channel/Hz>
>>
>> hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF get /tuner0/status
>>
>> Keep checking the status as you aim the antenna...
>
> The pcHDTV came with two great utilties that I'll probably use. First
> is dtvsignal. Here's the current output using my pcHDTV 5500:
>
> user [at] mytht:~/dvb-atsc-tools-1.0.7$ ./dtvsignal 34
> using '/dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0' and '/dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0'
> tuning to 593000000 Hz
> video pid 0x0021, audio pid 0x0024
> dtvsignal ver 1.0.7 - by Jack Kelliher (c) 2002-2007
> channel = 34 freq = 593000000Hz
> 30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
> Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
> Signal: 048 ------------------------
>
> (the signal bar on the last line is "live". Not doing too well on
> channel 34 [Grand Island] today)
>
> For comparison, here's CBC from the CN tower:
>
> channel = 20 freq = 509000000Hz
> 30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
> Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
> Signal: 011 -----
>
> The other tool is dtvsnr:
>
> Grand Island:
>
> channel = 34 freq = 593000000Hz
> dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
> SNR: | | | | | |
> SNR: 017 ============================
>
> CN Tower:
>
> channel = 20 freq = 509000000Hz
> dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
> SNR: | | | | | |
> SNR: 003 --------------
>
> The hills south of me:
>
> channel = 38 freq = 617000000Hz
> dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
> SNR: | | | | | |
> SNR: 026 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
> I'll see what I can get tonight on these using just a single well-aimed
> antenna and with each of the tuners.
>
> Thanks again for all the help.
>
> J.S.
>

J.S.,

A suggest mod for dtvsignal.c this will collect signal for 10 seconds and
give you an average over the 10 seconds, you may want to increase it to more
than 10 seconds, I found the initial long lock time on some channels seemed
to affect it more, maybe just have it ignore the first few seconds, and then
average the rest out.

336,337c336
< unsigned long count=0;
< unsigned long sig_total=0;
---
>
368c367,368
< while(count < 1000) {
---
>
> while(1) {
401d400
< sig_total += signal;
404d402
< count ++;
406d403
< fprintf(stderr,"\nChannel = %3d Signal Average %3ld\n",chan,sig_total/count);

And one might use a script like this:

channel=2
#while [ ${channel} -lt 100 ] ; do
for channel in 7 18 21 23 24 28 31 34 36 42 44 47 48 51 ; do
dtvsignal -dvb 0 ${channel} 2>&1 | grep "Signal Average"
# channel=`expr ${channel} + 1`
done

Run first with the "for channel" commented out and with the while/channel=
uncommented and then run the for channel with the list of actual channels
that you find.

Roger
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


backuppc at sundquist

Feb 24, 2008, 3:05 PM

Post #35 of 36 (671 views)
Permalink
Re: HDHomerun signal strength required [In reply to]

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:16:56 -0500, backuppc [at] sundquist
said:

> I will try each antenna individually and
> tweak the aim to get the best reception and then compare it to when both
> are hooked up. If the signal is much weaker when combined, I will try
> small adjustments to see of steer out of a null for the channels I need.
> Maybe even set up a second attic mast and separate then laterally.
>
> After I get the best aim on the north/norhwest one, I'll see if I can
> get the big ABC/CBS/NBC towers located not too far to the south out
> the back of that same antenna.

Findings:

Disconnected the south facing antenna, connecting the 50-foot RG-6
directly to the other antenna's balun. That antenna (the one aimed
towards Grand Island/CN Tower) seemed to be aimed well, changing
direction just made it worse.

Most interestingly, I got the ABC/CBS/NBC signals "out the back" just
fine with only one antenna, pointed the other way.

This is all with the pcHDTV 5500 Here are the results from before (two
antennas):

> The pcHDTV came with two great utilties that I'll probably use. First
> is dtvsignal. Here's the current output using my pcHDTV 5500:
>
> user [at] mytht:~/dvb-atsc-tools-1.0.7$ ./dtvsignal 34
> using '/dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0' and '/dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0'
> tuning to 593000000 Hz
> video pid 0x0021, audio pid 0x0024
> dtvsignal ver 1.0.7 - by Jack Kelliher (c) 2002-2007
> channel = 34 freq = 593000000Hz
> 30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
> Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
> Signal: 048 ------------------------
>
> (the signal bar on the last line is "live". Not doing too well on
> channel 34 [Grand Island] today)
>
> For comparison, here's CBC from the CN tower:
>
> channel = 20 freq = 509000000Hz
> 30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
> Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
> Signal: 011 -----
>
> The other tool is dtvsnr:
>
> Grand Island:
>
> channel = 34 freq = 593000000Hz
> dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
> SNR: | | | | | |
> SNR: 017 ============================
>
> CN Tower:
>
> channel = 20 freq = 509000000Hz
> dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
> SNR: | | | | | |
> SNR: 003 --------------
>
> The hills south of me:
>
> channel = 38 freq = 617000000Hz
> dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
> SNR: | | | | | |
> SNR: 026 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

And here's the results with one antenna (with the pcHDTV 5500):

signal stength:

channel = 34 freq = 593000000Hz
30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
Signal: 051 -------------------------

channel = 20 freq = 509000000Hz
30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
Signal: 014 -------

channel = 38 freq = 617000000Hz
30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
Signal: 077 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

S/N:

channel = 34 freq = 593000000Hz
dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
SNR: | | | | | |
SNR: 017 ============================

channel = 20 freq = 509000000Hz
dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
SNR: | | | | | |
SNR: 003 --------------

channel = 38 freq = 617000000Hz
dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
SNR: | | | | | |
SNR: 026 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

So about the same. I took the second antenna out of the attic.

But the HDHR is disappointing me so far. Following the Craig's advice:

> > SiliconDust provides a utility to work with the HDHomeRun that can
> > help for testing reception. Do a full channel scan on one of the
> > tuners, which will take several minutes, with:
> >
> > hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF scan /tuner0 scan0.txt
> >
> > Focus on the bits of interest with:
> >
> > grep -B1 -A1 '8vsb' scan0.txt

I get:

SCANNING: 473000000 (us-bcast:14)
LOCK: 8vsb (ss=59 snq=72 seq=100)
PROGRAM: 3: 29.1 WUTV-HD
--
SCANNING: 581000000 (us-bcast:32)
LOCK: 8vsb (ss=67 snq=73 seq=100)
PROGRAM: 3: 23.1 WNLO-HD
--
SCANNING: 587000000 (us-bcast:33)
LOCK: 8vsb (ss=98 snq=89 seq=100)
PROGRAM: 1: 2.1 WGRZ-HD
--
SCANNING: 593000000 (us-bcast:34)
LOCK: 8vsb (ss=48 snq=48 seq=100)
PROGRAM: 3: 49.1 WNYO-HD
--
SCANNING: 617000000 (us-bcast:38)
LOCK: 8vsb (ss=70 snq=69 seq=100)
PROGRAM: 3: 7.1 WKBW-HD
--
SCANNING: 623000000 (us-bcast:39)
LOCK: 8vsb (ss=91 snq=93 seq=100)
PROGRAM: 5: 4.1 WIVB-HD
--
SCANNING: 647000000 (us-bcast:43)
LOCK: 8vsb (ss=44 snq=43 seq=100)
PROGRAM: 2: 43.1 WNED-HD

...which are somewhat lower. Perhaps that is understandable because I
have the splitter in place with the HDHR. And in fact, I suppose the
numbers are not all that different for the three I highlight. But for
1,000 KW Fox (channel 14), the discrepancy is greater:

channel = 14 freq = 473000000Hz
30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
Signal: 076 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

vs:

SCANNING: 473000000 (us-bcast:14)
LOCK: 8vsb (ss=59 snq=72 seq=100)
PROGRAM: 3: 29.1 WUTV-HD

But maybe the numbers aren't comparable between the two utilties.

So anyway, the antenna question is solved for now. Maybe this summer I
will install the now-decommissioned antenna on the roof and see what I
get.

In the meantime, I can't judge the HDHR image quality since it won't
play anything yet. Obviously must be a backend configuration issue, but
I can't figure out what is wrong. I didn't remove the pcHDTV card from
the set up (even though no antenna is plugged into it). I thought
mythTV would just switch over to the tuner with a signal.

I probably screwed upsomething simple, but I'll keep checking...

Jon S.
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


rogerheflin at gmail

Feb 25, 2008, 6:27 AM

Post #36 of 36 (653 views)
Permalink
Re: HDHomerun signal strength required [In reply to]

backuppc [at] sundquist wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:16:56 -0500, backuppc [at] sundquist
> said:
>
>> I will try each antenna individually and
>> tweak the aim to get the best reception and then compare it to when both
>> are hooked up. If the signal is much weaker when combined, I will try
>> small adjustments to see of steer out of a null for the channels I need.
>> Maybe even set up a second attic mast and separate then laterally.
>>
>> After I get the best aim on the north/norhwest one, I'll see if I can
>> get the big ABC/CBS/NBC towers located not too far to the south out
>> the back of that same antenna.
>
> Findings:
>
> Disconnected the south facing antenna, connecting the 50-foot RG-6
> directly to the other antenna's balun. That antenna (the one aimed
> towards Grand Island/CN Tower) seemed to be aimed well, changing
> direction just made it worse.
>
> Most interestingly, I got the ABC/CBS/NBC signals "out the back" just
> fine with only one antenna, pointed the other way.
>
> This is all with the pcHDTV 5500 Here are the results from before (two
> antennas):
>
>
> And here's the results with one antenna (with the pcHDTV 5500):
>
> signal stength:
>
> channel = 34 freq = 593000000Hz
> 30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
> Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
> Signal: 051 -------------------------
>
> channel = 20 freq = 509000000Hz
> 30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
> Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
> Signal: 014 -------
>
> channel = 38 freq = 617000000Hz
> 30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
> Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
> Signal: 077 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
> S/N:
>
> channel = 34 freq = 593000000Hz
> dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
> SNR: | | | | | |
> SNR: 017 ============================
>
> channel = 20 freq = 509000000Hz
> dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
> SNR: | | | | | |
> SNR: 003 --------------
>
> channel = 38 freq = 617000000Hz
> dB -10 0 10 20 30 40
> SNR: | | | | | |
> SNR: 026 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
> So about the same. I took the second antenna out of the attic.
>
> But the HDHR is disappointing me so far. Following the Craig's advice:
>
>>> SiliconDust provides a utility to work with the HDHomeRun that can
>>> help for testing reception. Do a full channel scan on one of the
>>> tuners, which will take several minutes, with:
>>>
>>> hdhomerun_config FFFFFFFF scan /tuner0 scan0.txt
>>>
>>> Focus on the bits of interest with:
>>>
>>> grep -B1 -A1 '8vsb' scan0.txt
>
> I get:
>
> SCANNING: 473000000 (us-bcast:14)
> LOCK: 8vsb (ss=59 snq=72 seq=100)
> PROGRAM: 3: 29.1 WUTV-HD
> --
> SCANNING: 581000000 (us-bcast:32)
> LOCK: 8vsb (ss=67 snq=73 seq=100)
> PROGRAM: 3: 23.1 WNLO-HD
> --
> SCANNING: 587000000 (us-bcast:33)
> LOCK: 8vsb (ss=98 snq=89 seq=100)
> PROGRAM: 1: 2.1 WGRZ-HD
> --
> SCANNING: 593000000 (us-bcast:34)
> LOCK: 8vsb (ss=48 snq=48 seq=100)
> PROGRAM: 3: 49.1 WNYO-HD
> --
> SCANNING: 617000000 (us-bcast:38)
> LOCK: 8vsb (ss=70 snq=69 seq=100)
> PROGRAM: 3: 7.1 WKBW-HD
> --
> SCANNING: 623000000 (us-bcast:39)
> LOCK: 8vsb (ss=91 snq=93 seq=100)
> PROGRAM: 5: 4.1 WIVB-HD
> --
> SCANNING: 647000000 (us-bcast:43)
> LOCK: 8vsb (ss=44 snq=43 seq=100)
> PROGRAM: 2: 43.1 WNED-HD
>
> ...which are somewhat lower. Perhaps that is understandable because I
> have the splitter in place with the HDHR. And in fact, I suppose the
> numbers are not all that different for the three I highlight. But for
> 1,000 KW Fox (channel 14), the discrepancy is greater:
>
> channel = 14 freq = 473000000Hz
> 30db 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
> Signal: | . : . | ._____:_____._____|
> Signal: 076 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
> vs:
>
> SCANNING: 473000000 (us-bcast:14)
> LOCK: 8vsb (ss=59 snq=72 seq=100)
> PROGRAM: 3: 29.1 WUTV-HD
>
> But maybe the numbers aren't comparable between the two utilties.

I would not count on the numbers being comparable. The numbers between
my 5550 and my actual hdtv differ quite a bit, the hdtv fails to work
at about 80% or below, and the 5500 fails at around 65-70, and checking
the same signal the 5500 gives numbers that are 10-15 % lower. I would
expect the HDHR to be different from either of the 2.

My biggest issue with antennas was I had a bad cable and a bad splitter,
both had been used outside for a while and apparently got water damage.

Roger
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All MythTV users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.