Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: MythTV: Users

Re: OT: identify a 3ware SARA card? 8000 or 9000 series?

 

 

MythTV users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


daworm at comcast

Jan 17, 2008, 10:27 AM

Post #1 of 2 (306 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: identify a 3ware SARA card? 8000 or 9000 series?

John Drescher wrote:
>> The drives were ok, but more than one got too hot at the
>> same time and shut down, thus crashing the array, and thus losing all of
>> the data. Keep the drives cool and you shouldn't have this problem. It
>> isn't the fault of the card, at any rate.
>>
> Is there no way to force the controller to use a dirty/failed drive
> like mdadm permits?
>
Not sure what you mean, as I don't use mdadm... There is a BIOS level
utility you access at boot time to add and remove drives from the array,
which you can do with a failed drive after it has cooled off and started
working, if you only have one or two (after the first fails, the hot
spare replaces it, when the second fails, the RAID5 still works but in
degraded mode - it's when the third fails that problems set in, because
the other two have been marked bad and stay that way until you release
them and reassign them). It may be possible to do that with the tw_cli
utility, but I wouldn't know how as I never needed to do that to a
running system. Since it was shut away in a closet (hence the bad
ventilation) and I didn't have a mailer daemon running for it to send
failure notices through, I never knew it was bad until it was totally
borked. Once put into a cooler environment, I've never had another
problem with it.

--
I haven't smoked for 1 year, 5 months and 14 hours,
saving $2,333.83 and not smoking 15,558.89 cigarettes.
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


drescherjm at gmail

Jan 17, 2008, 11:00 AM

Post #2 of 2 (273 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: identify a 3ware SARA card? 8000 or 9000 series? [In reply to]

> Not sure what you mean, as I don't use mdadm...
This is the linux software raid utility.

> There is a BIOS level
> utility you access at boot time to add and remove drives from the array,
> which you can do with a failed drive after it has cooled off and started
> working, if you only have one or two (after the first fails, the hot
> spare replaces it, when the second fails, the RAID5 still works but in
> degraded mode - it's when the third fails that problems set in, because
> the other two have been marked bad and stay that way until you release
> them and reassign them).
This is the very similar with mdadm. But you with mdadm you can force the
raid array to use failed drives without loosing their data. I assume you
will have corruption at the points the array is out of sync but in your case
if all drives are not really dead the array would have gone offline after 2
drives were kicked out so in that case the problem would have been
recoverable if you figure out which drive was the second to be marked
faulty.

John

MythTV users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.