blaine.m.nelson at gmail
Aug 29, 2007, 3:36 PM
Post #14 of 17
(1237 views)
Permalink
|
This is going to kill me.
Fellas, thanks for the ideas, but still nothing.
First I tried Dave's idea of using the dtv control program on a windows
laptop. Tried this with all the command sets. New, old, D10-100 etc.
Tried both /dev/ttyS0 and /dev/ttyS1. So this seems to indicate either a
failed cable or a failed d10-300 box. (But, it could also be that this
program doesn't work with the D10-300? Yes? Or, I guess it could mean the
serial port is screwed up on my laptop).
Going with the former hypothesis, that the cable might be broken, I dug up
my volt ohm meter and checked the cable. It seems to be wired correctly.
That is, testing indicates it's wired like so:
Modular 4P4C adapter wiring DE9F Modular 4P4C Wire Color 5 1 Black 2 2
Red 3 4 Yellow
Ok, so next hypothesis. Busted receiver. Well, I bought two of these
things on ebay with the hope of eventually getting two pvr cards rolling.
So, I have another one laying around. Great, right? Another test.
Unfortunately, directv doesn't allow you to transfer the access card number
to new receivers. They make you buy a new card, $20! I wouldn't mind if I
knew this worked b/c I need the card anyways for two pvrs. But, it seems
like alot of money if I'm just going to have to go back to the drawing board
and buy d10-100s (vice 300s) or some other receiver.
But, wait. Maybe I could test the basic operations, e.g. turn-on, turn-off,
get channel etc., without actually having access to the satellite data
feed. This possibility got me real excited and I jumped out of bed, ran to
the basement to try it. Only to realize, that with the d10-300, you need
the software upgrade that comes down off the satellite. Ugh.
Have you guys had the same experience with Directv? $20 buckets just to
change receivers?
If I have to buy new receivers, which model would you recommend as the most
forgiving?
Again, thanks for all your ideas.
On 8/27/07, George Mari <george_mythusers[at]mari1938.org> wrote:
>
> Blaine Nelson wrote:
> > As for the serial port check, I don't have a modem lying around. But,
> > I do have an old mouse with the old round serial ps2 port and an even
> > older adpater that goes from the round serial ps2-style port to a
> > regular serial port. I'm not sure if this counts as a serial device
> > but here's what I did. Plug the mouse into the round serial ps2-style
> > port. Reboot. Mouse worked fine. Plug the mouse into the regular
> > serial port using the adapter. Reboot. Mouse did not work at all. I
> > tried again on the second serial port. Still nothing from the mouse.
> >
> > Should the mouse have worked in the regular serial port? Xubuntu (the
> > distro I'm using) picked up on the mouse in the round ps2-style port
> > but not the regular port. Can I take this as an indication that the
> > serial port is screwed up?
> >
> > And if so, what's next? What steps can I take to see why the mouse
> > isn't working?
> >
> > Thanks everyone for putting up with all this.
> >
> >
>
> The only other way I can think of to test the port without a modem is
> another computer. Hook-up two computers via a serial cable. You can
> use some sort of terminal program, like minicom, to establish
> communications between the two computers over the serial port.
>
> Basically, you just want something you know works on the other end of
> your serial port, to see if you can get it working.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have much experience with serial mice.
>
> Have you checked that your serial ports are enabled in your BIOS?
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users[at]mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>
|
