
brian at interlinx
Aug 7, 2007, 2:48 PM
Post #3 of 3
(726 views)
Permalink
|
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 17:41 -0400, Michelle Dupuis wrote: > From a schedule distribution cost standpoint (servers, bandwidth, > management), what about leveraging a P2P technology? Since a lot of > back-ends are running full time, it seems reasonable to share > schedules that way. OMG! Are we seriously going to do this again? Is it not bad enough that this whole paying-for-listings-data really-really-dead-horse is being beaten and beaten all over again in the "Supporting schedulesdirect.org" thread. Please, please, people, go read the archives! b. -- My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell
|