jyavenard at gmail
Jun 4, 2012, 3:42 AM
Post #2 of 2
On 4 June 2012 19:29, Colin Guthrie <mythtv [at] colin> wrote:
> Is there a specific reason to use the libcec loader rather than linking
> directly? Support is optional, so I see no real reason to have two
> levels of optional-ness!
> The reason I ask is that at present, no directly linking against libcec
> happens and thus when packaging mythtv, no automatic requires are added
> fro linked libraries.
Last I added weak-linking and dynamic linking to one of the myth lib ;
it was quickly reverted as the code wasn't portable.
E.g. you do it differently on mac, windows, linux...
If you find a way to do such thing in a portable manner, I don't see the problem
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev [at] mythtv