Mailing List Archive: MythTV: Dev

Re: [mythtv-commits] Ticket #7211: Update MythWeb to support storage groups

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

simon at koala

Jan 25, 2010, 3:16 AM

Post #1 of 2 (512 views)
Permalink

Re: [mythtv-commits] Ticket #7211: Update MythWeb to support storage groups

On 25/01/2010 01:50, MythTV wrote:

> > #7211: Update MythWeb to support storage groups
> > ------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
> > Reporter: kormoc | Owner: kormoc
> > Type: enhancement | Status: new
> > Priority: minor | Milestone: 0.23
> > Component: Plugin - MythWeb | Version: head
> > Severity: medium | Mlocked: 0
> > ------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
> >
> > Comment(by xris):
> >
> > Video portion of mythweb has been upgraded for storage groups. What's
> > next?
> >
> >
>
well i posted a patch in #7674 which added some very basic stuff to
support coverart
but they all suffer from the same missing feature - streaming of content
from a remote storagegroup
mr dean suggested using mythxml. i will have a look at that after i sort
out some hardware adminstrivia

so i would say that that is next

any by the way - my coverart patch (for the display part at least) means
that you don't need a data/video_covers symbolic link
--
simon

mtdean at thirdcontact

Jan 25, 2010, 10:44 AM

Post #2 of 2 (454 views)
Permalink

Re: [mythtv-commits] Ticket #7211: Update MythWeb to support storage groups [In reply to]

On 01/25/2010 06:16 AM, Simon Kenyon wrote:

> On 25/01/2010 01:50, MythTV wrote:
>
>> #7211: Update MythWeb to support storage groups
>>
>> Comment(by xris):
>>
>> Video portion of mythweb has been upgraded for storage groups.
>> What's next?
>
> well i posted a patch in #7674 which added some very basic stuff to
> support coverart but they all suffer from the same missing feature -
> streaming of content from a remote storagegroup mr dean suggested
> using mythxml. i will have a look at that after i sort out some
> hardware adminstrivia
>
> so i would say that that is next

Well, I didn't go so far as to suggest MythXML. I was really trying to
suggest asking Chris Petersen or Rob Smith what approach they would
prefer for the streaming--either mythproto-based socket code,
MythXML-based, or the (mentioned, but still not available) JSON-based
approach that David Blain said he was working on

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/dev/418085#418085

Mike
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev [at] mythtv
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads