Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: MythTV: Dev

Video Sources - time to call them what they are?

 

 

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All MythTV dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


justin at mythtvthemes

Nov 21, 2007, 2:37 AM

Post #1 of 46 (3855 views)
Permalink
Video Sources - time to call them what they are?

For some time now I've considered the possibility that 'Video Sources'
are causing more confusion among users than necessary.

Those of us more familiar with MythTV have no problem understanding the
relationship between capture cards, card inputs & the 'video sources'.
For new users though, the words 'video sources' more than likely conjure
up images of actual video inputs - something that doesn't bear any
relation to 'sources of TV Guide data'.

So, I'm proposing that 'Video Sources' are renamed 'TV Guide data
sources' or something similar. I know that it'll no doubt mess up some
translations but if we're all on board with the idea it'll be trivial
to fix. Somewhat more involved (but hardly the end of the world) would
be updating table & column names to suit.

Would anybody object to this?

Justin
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


mythtv2008 at bdam

Nov 21, 2007, 2:53 AM

Post #2 of 46 (3784 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

On Nov 21, 2007 11:37 AM, Justin Hornsby <justin[at]mythtvthemes.co.uk> wrote:

> So, I'm proposing that 'Video Sources' are renamed 'TV Guide data
> sources' or something similar.

Great idea! *Everywhere* I install mythtv they ask me what "video sources" are.

Adam
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


laga+mythtv at laga

Nov 21, 2007, 3:19 AM

Post #3 of 46 (3781 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

Adam Egger schrieb:
> On Nov 21, 2007 11:37 AM, Justin Hornsby <justin[at]mythtvthemes.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> So, I'm proposing that 'Video Sources' are renamed 'TV Guide data
>> sources' or something similar.
>
> Great idea! *Everywhere* I install mythtv they ask me what "video sources" are.
>

Ack.
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


sgbirch at imsmail

Nov 21, 2007, 3:23 AM

Post #4 of 46 (3777 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

Michael Haas wrote:
> Adam Egger schrieb:
>> On Nov 21, 2007 11:37 AM, Justin Hornsby <justin[at]mythtvthemes.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> So, I'm proposing that 'Video Sources' are renamed 'TV Guide data
>>> sources' or something similar.
>> Great idea! *Everywhere* I install mythtv they ask me what "video sources" are.

Yup .. I built my first myth box a few weeks ago so I am a qualified
noob and can assure you the existing name is highly confusing.

Steve

_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


chamilton at cs

Nov 21, 2007, 4:52 AM

Post #5 of 46 (3774 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

> Michael Haas wrote:
>> Adam Egger schrieb:
>>> On Nov 21, 2007 11:37 AM, Justin Hornsby <justin[at]mythtvthemes.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So, I'm proposing that 'Video Sources' are renamed 'TV Guide data
>>>> sources' or something similar.
>>> Great idea! *Everywhere* I install mythtv they ask me what "video sources" are.
>
> Yup .. I built my first myth box a few weeks ago so I am a qualified
> noob and can assure you the existing name is highly confusing.

I would be more partial to something like 'Channel Lineups' or
'Television Service Providers'. The 'TV Guide Data Source' is itself a
sub-configuration item *per* video source/channel lineup/TV service
provider.

Cheers

Chris
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


justin at mythtvthemes

Nov 21, 2007, 5:03 AM

Post #6 of 46 (3787 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

Chris Hamilton wrote:
> I would be more partial to something like 'Channel Lineups' or
> 'Television Service Providers'. The 'TV Guide Data Source' is itself a
> sub-configuration item *per* video source/channel lineup/TV service
> provider.
>
> Cheers
>
> Chris
>
Channel lineups would be inaccurate. Channels are linked to EPG data
sources in the channel editor/scanner
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


newbury at mandamus

Nov 21, 2007, 5:21 AM

Post #7 of 46 (3780 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

Justin Hornsby wrote:
> For some time now I've considered the possibility that 'Video Sources'
> are causing more confusion among users than necessary.
>
> Those of us more familiar with MythTV have no problem understanding the
> relationship between capture cards, card inputs & the 'video sources'.
> For new users though, the words 'video sources' more than likely conjure
> up images of actual video inputs - something that doesn't bear any
> relation to 'sources of TV Guide data'.
>
> So, I'm proposing that 'Video Sources' are renamed 'TV Guide data
> sources' or something similar. I know that it'll no doubt mess up some
> translations but if we're all on board with the idea it'll be trivial
> to fix. Somewhat more involved (but hardly the end of the world) would
> be updating table & column names to suit.
>
> Would anybody object to this?

Yes. 'TV Guide data sources' sounds like what Schedules Direct offers.

Something like 'TV Channel Groups' might be more descriptive of the
things which are contained in that container. A 'Channel Group' is
clearly a collection of TV channels which, as it happens, can be
captured by one type of defined capture card.

Geoff
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


ctreleaven at cogeco

Nov 21, 2007, 6:07 AM

Post #8 of 46 (3776 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

At 8:21 AM -0500 11/21/07, R. G. Newbury wrote:
> > Would anybody object to this ['TV Guide data sources' or something similar]?
>
>Yes. 'TV Guide data sources' sounds like what Schedules Direct offers.
>
>Something like 'TV Channel Groups' might be more descriptive of the
>things which are contained in that container. A 'Channel Group' is
>clearly a collection of TV channels which, as it happens, can be
>captured by one type of defined capture card.

From a user perspective, this setup screen is how we tell Myth where to get guide data. If there is a vote, I'd say it ought to be titled 'TV Listings source' or 'Guide data source'. I don't know if one works better internationally than another.

Craig
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


justin at mythtvthemes

Nov 21, 2007, 6:44 AM

Post #9 of 46 (3777 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

Craig Treleaven wrote:
> At 8:21 AM -0500 11/21/07, R. G. Newbury wrote:
>
>>> Would anybody object to this ['TV Guide data sources' or something similar]?
>>>
>> Yes. 'TV Guide data sources' sounds like what Schedules Direct offers.
>>
>> Something like 'TV Channel Groups' might be more descriptive of the
>> things which are contained in that container. A 'Channel Group' is
>> clearly a collection of TV channels which, as it happens, can be
>> captured by one type of defined capture card.
>>
>
> >From a user perspective, this setup screen is how we tell Myth where to get guide data. If there is a vote, I'd say it ought to be titled 'TV Listings source' or 'Guide data source'. I don't know if one works better internationally than another.
>
> Craig
>
I definitely hope there's not going to be a vote. FFS
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


sgbirch at imsmail

Nov 21, 2007, 6:49 AM

Post #10 of 46 (3772 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

Justin Hornsby wrote:
> Craig Treleaven wrote:
>> At 8:21 AM -0500 11/21/07, R. G. Newbury wrote:
>>
>>>> Would anybody object to this ['TV Guide data sources' or something similar]?
>>>>
>>> Yes. 'TV Guide data sources' sounds like what Schedules Direct offers.
>>>
>>> Something like 'TV Channel Groups' might be more descriptive of the
>>> things which are contained in that container. A 'Channel Group' is
>>> clearly a collection of TV channels which, as it happens, can be
>>> captured by one type of defined capture card.
>>>
>> >From a user perspective, this setup screen is how we tell Myth where to get guide data. If there is a vote, I'd say it ought to be titled 'TV Listings source' or 'Guide data source'. I don't know if one works better internationally than another.

Craig is completely correct IMHO. Focus on the user experience when
writing menu options.

My vote would also be "TV Listings Source".

Steve

_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


disafan at aim

Nov 21, 2007, 7:04 AM

Post #11 of 46 (3769 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

I think you should simplify it to "Data Sources" It is only a one word
change, and is easy to interpret.

>> So, I'm proposing that 'Video Sources' are renamed 'TV Guide data
>> sources' or something similar.
>>

_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


danielk at cuymedia

Nov 21, 2007, 7:11 AM

Post #12 of 46 (3775 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 08:21 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote:
> Justin Hornsby wrote:

> Yes. 'TV Guide data sources' sounds like what Schedules Direct offers.
>
> Something like 'TV Channel Groups' might be more descriptive of the
> things which are contained in that container. A 'Channel Group' is
> clearly a collection of TV channels which, as it happens, can be
> captured by one type of defined capture card.

Channel Group, Tuning Lineup, are both better than "TV Guide data
sources". A single lineup provider or source can update multiple
"Video Sources" and multiple lineup providers can update a single
"Video Source" (EIT + XMLTV for example). When you have something
Like DVB-S with a rotor the "Video Source" corresponds to a single
orbital location, but multiple orbital locations may be on the
same network getting EIT from a single transport at a single orbital
location and multiple "Video Sources" may be associated with the
same orbital location because satellites in different networks are
parked in a cluster occupying the same orbital location.

I don't think there is any doubt that the existing "Video Sources"
is confusing to most people new to MythTV, and will become more so
when/if we start doing lineups for DVB Radio and the like.

PS "TV Guide" is also a registered trademark for channel lineup
and listings services, so we can't use that as part of the name.

-- Daniel

_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


mtdean at thirdcontact

Nov 21, 2007, 7:31 AM

Post #13 of 46 (3765 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

On 11/21/2007 09:07 AM, Craig Treleaven wrote:
> At 8:21 AM -0500 11/21/07, R. G. Newbury wrote:
>
>>> Would anybody object to this ['TV Guide data sources' or something similar]?
>>>
>> Yes. 'TV Guide data sources' sounds like what Schedules Direct offers.
>>
>> Something like 'TV Channel Groups' might be more descriptive of the
>> things which are contained in that container. A 'Channel Group' is
>> clearly a collection of TV channels which, as it happens, can be
>> captured by one type of defined capture card.
>>
> From a user perspective, this setup screen is how we tell Myth where to get guide data. If there is a vote, I'd say it ought to be titled 'TV Listings source' or 'Guide data source'. I don't know if one works better internationally than another.

How do you connect a TV listings source to an input on your capture card
(think Input Connections)? Personally, I connected an RG-6 cable from
my antenna to the capture card. This cable happens to be the source of
the video my capture cards capture.

Since the video source uses the US broadcast frequency table--which I
had previously configured as the default for my Myth setup--I also
specified that information in the video source configuration. And, of
course, I gave it a nice descriptive name, "OTA", that I could use to
refer back to the video source when connecting inputs to my capture cards.

If I also had a cable TV subscription, I would have a separate video
source provided over a different RG-6 cable connected to the cable
company's network. That video source would use the same listings
source, Schedules Direct, that's used by my OTA source. However, I
would specify a different lineup within that listings source.
Similarly, in other parts of the world, multiple video sources may need
to be configured to use the same listings source (XMLTV data provided
from whatever web site).

And, now that the Schedules Direct code supports using a single
Schedules Direct lineup with multiple video source, calling a "video
source" a "TV listings source" or whatever would be even farther from
reality. The same cable from the cable company may carry analog
channels and unencrypted digital channels and channels that are only
accessible through an STB (via either firewire output or analog
output). In that case, Myth requires the user create multiple video
sources--a fact that would be lost in calling the video source a "TV
listings source" since they all may use the same Schedules Direct
account and lineup (OK, this only applies in the US, but if someone were
to write some caching support into XMLTV and update mythfilldatabase to
support it...).

To me, the term "Video sources", seems to be about right. The one case
where it's not necessarily accurate is when a cable company or satellite
company may provide audio only channels (i.e. "digital radio").
However, in most (if not all) cases I've seen, there is actually a video
signal, too--though recording it may be a waste.

Apologies to Bruce for any places where I may have butchered the true
meaning/reasoning behind these terms, but I think this view of a video
source is much truer than the "listings source" view.

Even "channel group" doesn't seem right (though, probably closer)--after
all, if I were to list my favorite channels, they would be a group of
channels, but it's meaningless in configuring Myth (i.e. "channel
groups" sounds more like something to be used to separate out channels
for various views--i.e. favorites, Science and History, News, etc.--on
the frontend) Perhaps, "Groups of channels that are available through a
particular video source using a particular capture card input with a
particular frequency table and/or channel change command." Maybe we
could find one or two words in that description to use to
shorten/approximate the meaning. ;)

In other words, I think these terminology changes may be
over-simplifications. But, that's just my $0.02 (which is less valuable
than it would have been a couple of years ago since the dollar is weak.

Mike
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


justin at mythtvthemes

Nov 21, 2007, 8:36 AM

Post #14 of 46 (3768 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

Michael T. Dean wrote:
> On 11/21/2007 09:07 AM, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>
>> At 8:21 AM -0500 11/21/07, R. G. Newbury wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Would anybody object to this ['TV Guide data sources' or something similar]?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yes. 'TV Guide data sources' sounds like what Schedules Direct offers.
>>>
>>> Something like 'TV Channel Groups' might be more descriptive of the
>>> things which are contained in that container. A 'Channel Group' is
>>> clearly a collection of TV channels which, as it happens, can be
>>> captured by one type of defined capture card.
>>>
>>>
>> From a user perspective, this setup screen is how we tell Myth where to get guide data. If there is a vote, I'd say it ought to be titled 'TV Listings source' or 'Guide data source'. I don't know if one works better internationally than another.
>>
>
> How do you connect a TV listings source to an input on your capture card
> (think Input Connections)? Personally, I connected an RG-6 cable from
> my antenna to the capture card. This cable happens to be the source of
> the video my capture cards capture.
>
> Since the video source uses the US broadcast frequency table--which I
> had previously configured as the default for my Myth setup--I also
> specified that information in the video source configuration. And, of
> course, I gave it a nice descriptive name, "OTA", that I could use to
> refer back to the video source when connecting inputs to my capture cards.
>
> If I also had a cable TV subscription, I would have a separate video
> source provided over a different RG-6 cable connected to the cable
> company's network. That video source would use the same listings
> source, Schedules Direct, that's used by my OTA source. However, I
> would specify a different lineup within that listings source.
> Similarly, in other parts of the world, multiple video sources may need
> to be configured to use the same listings source (XMLTV data provided
> from whatever web site).
>
> And, now that the Schedules Direct code supports using a single
> Schedules Direct lineup with multiple video source, calling a "video
> source" a "TV listings source" or whatever would be even farther from
> reality. The same cable from the cable company may carry analog
> channels and unencrypted digital channels and channels that are only
> accessible through an STB (via either firewire output or analog
> output). In that case, Myth requires the user create multiple video
> sources--a fact that would be lost in calling the video source a "TV
> listings source" since they all may use the same Schedules Direct
> account and lineup (OK, this only applies in the US, but if someone were
> to write some caching support into XMLTV and update mythfilldatabase to
> support it...).
>
> To me, the term "Video sources", seems to be about right. The one case
> where it's not necessarily accurate is when a cable company or satellite
> company may provide audio only channels (i.e. "digital radio").
> However, in most (if not all) cases I've seen, there is actually a video
> signal, too--though recording it may be a waste.
>
> Apologies to Bruce for any places where I may have butchered the true
> meaning/reasoning behind these terms, but I think this view of a video
> source is much truer than the "listings source" view.
>
> Even "channel group" doesn't seem right (though, probably closer)--after
> all, if I were to list my favorite channels, they would be a group of
> channels, but it's meaningless in configuring Myth (i.e. "channel
> groups" sounds more like something to be used to separate out channels
> for various views--i.e. favorites, Science and History, News, etc.--on
> the frontend) Perhaps, "Groups of channels that are available through a
> particular video source using a particular capture card input with a
> particular frequency table and/or channel change command." Maybe we
> could find one or two words in that description to use to
> shorten/approximate the meaning. ;)
>
> In other words, I think these terminology changes may be
> over-simplifications. But, that's just my $0.02 (which is less valuable
> than it would have been a couple of years ago since the dollar is weak.
>
> Mike
>
I've personally never seen the name 'video sources' as particularly
accurate or logical. I just got on with it & muddled through. MythTV
is reaching a level of exposure in its maturity where concerns about the
'average' new user have to be addressed IMHO.

Do me a favour. Ask a friend who doesn't know anything about mythtv
what meaning 'Video Sources' would imply to them.

Justin
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


ctreleaven at cogeco

Nov 21, 2007, 8:46 AM

Post #15 of 46 (3778 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

At 10:31 AM -0500 11/21/07, Michael T. Dean wrote:
>On 11/21/2007 09:07 AM, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>>From a user perspective, this setup screen is how we tell Myth where to get guide data. If there is a vote, I'd say it ought to be titled 'TV Listings source' or 'Guide data source'. I don't know if one works better internationally than another.
>
>How do you connect a TV listings source to an input on your capture card
>(think Input Connections)? Personally, I connected an RG-6 cable from
>my antenna to the capture card. This cable happens to be the source of
>the video my capture cards capture.
>
>Since the video source uses the US broadcast frequency table--which I
>had previously configured as the default for my Myth setup--I also
>specified that information in the video source configuration. And, of
>course, I gave it a nice descriptive name, "OTA", that I could use to
>refer back to the video source when connecting inputs to my capture cards.
>
>If I also had a cable TV subscription, I would have a separate video
>source provided over a different RG-6 cable connected to the cable
>company's network. That video source would use the same listings
>source, Schedules Direct, that's used by my OTA source. However, I
>would specify a different lineup within that listings source.
>Similarly, in other parts of the world, multiple video sources may need
>to be configured to use the same listings source (XMLTV data provided
>from whatever web site).
>
>And, now that the Schedules Direct code supports using a single
>Schedules Direct lineup with multiple video source, calling a "video
>source" a "TV listings source" or whatever would be even farther from
>reality. The same cable from the cable company may carry analog
>channels and unencrypted digital channels and channels that are only
>accessible through an STB (via either firewire output or analog
>output). In that case, Myth requires the user create multiple video
>sources--a fact that would be lost in calling the video source a "TV
>listings source" since they all may use the same Schedules Direct
>account and lineup (OK, this only applies in the US, but if someone were
>to write some caching support into XMLTV and update mythfilldatabase to
>support it...).
>
>To me, the term "Video sources", seems to be about right. The one case
>where it's not necessarily accurate is when a cable company or satellite
>company may provide audio only channels (i.e. "digital radio").
>However, in most (if not all) cases I've seen, there is actually a video
>signal, too--though recording it may be a waste.
>
>Apologies to Bruce for any places where I may have butchered the true
>meaning/reasoning behind these terms, but I think this view of a video
>source is much truer than the "listings source" view.
>
>Even "channel group" doesn't seem right (though, probably closer)--after
>all, if I were to list my favorite channels, they would be a group of
>channels, but it's meaningless in configuring Myth (i.e. "channel
>groups" sounds more like something to be used to separate out channels
>for various views--i.e. favorites, Science and History, News, etc.--on
>the frontend) Perhaps, "Groups of channels that are available through a
>particular video source using a particular capture card input with a
>particular frequency table and/or channel change command." Maybe we
>could find one or two words in that description to use to
>shorten/approximate the meaning. ;)
>
>In other words, I think these terminology changes may be
>over-simplifications. But, that's just my $0.02 (which is less valuable
>than it would have been a couple of years ago since the dollar is weak.

Wow, Mike. You type a lot!

I agree that coaxial cables are generally the source of our video signals. That's why calling this screen "Video Sources" troubles me. The screen is really about getting listing data into Myth so that, in the Input Connections screen, we can associate the video capture sources with listings data.

I also agree that a user may need multiple sources of listings data; even if it is just different lineups from the same listings provider. The design of the screen makes it obvious. That doesn't change that this screen is about getting listings--not video.

To me, the title should focus on what the user is going to accomplish in the screen. I think maybe you're getting wound up in how the code is going to use the information?

Craig
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


newbury at mandamus

Nov 21, 2007, 9:20 AM

Post #16 of 46 (3742 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

Craig Treleaven wrote:
> At 8:21 AM -0500 11/21/07, R. G. Newbury wrote:
>>> Would anybody object to this ['TV Guide data sources' or something similar]?
>> Yes. 'TV Guide data sources' sounds like what Schedules Direct offers.
>>
>> Something like 'TV Channel Groups' might be more descriptive of the
>> things which are contained in that container. A 'Channel Group' is
>> clearly a collection of TV channels which, as it happens, can be
>> captured by one type of defined capture card.
>
>>From a user perspective, this setup screen is how we tell Myth where to get guide data. If there is a vote, I'd say it ought to be titled 'TV Listings source' or 'Guide data source'. I don't know if one works better internationally than another.
>

Gee, on my box, Video Sources ends up describing video suppliers NOT
where to get guide data. Where we *get* guide data is in one of the
screens for North American users, settings which are ignored by large
chunks of the globe.

Since one supplier supplies a grouping of channels (determined by
scanning and adding/deleting channels) then the name 'TV Channel Groups'
makes sense to me and is more descriptive than 'listing'.

Video Suppliers is one possibility, but then 'OTA' does not 'fit' as a
supplier since the OTA group is actually made up of a number of
suppliers...the networks and stations received.

Geoff

--
Tux says: "Be regular. Eat cron flakes."
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


jra at baylink

Nov 21, 2007, 9:38 AM

Post #17 of 46 (3768 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:37:04AM +0000, Justin Hornsby wrote:
> For some time now I've considered the possibility that 'Video Sources'
> are causing more confusion among users than necessary.
>
> Those of us more familiar with MythTV have no problem understanding the
> relationship between capture cards, card inputs & the 'video sources'.
> For new users though, the words 'video sources' more than likely conjure
> up images of actual video inputs - something that doesn't bear any
> relation to 'sources of TV Guide data'.
>
> So, I'm proposing that 'Video Sources' are renamed 'TV Guide data
> sources' or something similar. I know that it'll no doubt mess up some
> translations but if we're all on board with the idea it'll be trivial
> to fix. Somewhat more involved (but hardly the end of the world) would
> be updating table & column names to suit.

In the book Practical MythTV, which I tech edited for aPress earlier
this year, we touched on precisely this point. I recommended that
people consider them "Programming Sources", and gave "Bright House
Pinellas Analog Cable" as an example label.

I do concur that "Video Source" is a poor choice of label.

Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra[at]baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274

Witty slogan redacted until AMPTP stop screwing WGA
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


newbury at mandamus

Nov 21, 2007, 9:45 AM

Post #18 of 46 (3730 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

DISAFAN wrote:
> I think you should simplify it to "Data Sources" It is only a one word
> change, and is easy to interpret.
>
>>> So, I'm proposing that 'Video Sources' are renamed 'TV Guide data
>>> sources' or something similar.
>>>

The source of the confusion in this is that what each 'Video Source'
screen describes is not only *where* we get tv listings data, but *also*
indirectly defines the channel grouping contained in a 'Lineup'. All of
the Data comes from the same place, but parsed into groups, one for each
channel grouping.

It's a matter of semantics, but I think that since all of the Data comes
from the same source, the operative difference is what the groups are.

Admittedly it's a bit of a chicken and egg thing...(Hah, just typed
'chicken and effthing'! How freudian is that slop!)

But the noob really looking for an understandable distinction for the
different things he must define on this page. Would help if there were
some 'help' prompts too...

Geoff






--
Tux says: "Be regular. Eat cron flakes."
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


mtdean at thirdcontact

Nov 21, 2007, 9:58 AM

Post #19 of 46 (3774 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

On 11/21/2007 11:36 AM, Justin Hornsby wrote:
> Michael T. Dean wrote:
>
>> <a very long response, snipped>
>>
> I've personally never seen the name 'video sources' as particularly
> accurate or logical. I just got on with it & muddled through. MythTV
> is reaching a level of exposure in its maturity where concerns about the
> 'average' new user have to be addressed IMHO.
>
> Do me a favour. Ask a friend who doesn't know anything about mythtv
> what meaning 'Video Sources' would imply to them.

Oh, I completely agree with you--in spite of my long response--that the
terminology isn't easy for a new user to understand. The OC side of me
just has a hard time with the idea of making it less accurate regardless
of the purpose or the results. I can't really think of any name that's
both accurate and easy to understand so--were it my decision--I'd just
leave it the same.

I wonder, too, if the only reason that the term, "Season Pass" is easy
to understand is because TiVo drilled the term and its meaning into our
heads in their advertising campaign. Perhaps this is just a job for the
marketing/sales folks. :)

Mike
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


newbury at mandamus

Nov 21, 2007, 10:04 AM

Post #20 of 46 (3731 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

Justin Hornsby wrote:
> Regarding the fact 'TV Guide' is a trademarked name - isn't 'Windows'
> also trademarked? What am I supposed to say when I want to tell
> somebody I've been looking out at the world through the
> rectangular-shaped portals in my house? ;)
>
You call them 'windows', or 'Windows' if that word is the first one in a
sentence. Just do not attempt to sell operating system software called
by the same name.

Micro$oft does not *OWN* the word, they have a trade mark on the use of
the word to describe a particular product.

Or were you really worried that using Windex on the Windows of your
house would provide a legal window of opportunity for the Windows
lawyers to win the chance to winnow your bank account...?

Geoff


--
Tux says: "Be regular. Eat cron flakes."
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


jerrymr at gmail

Nov 21, 2007, 11:11 AM

Post #21 of 46 (3746 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

On 11/21/07, Michael T. Dean <mtdean[at]thirdcontact.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/21/2007 11:36 AM, Justin Hornsby wrote:
> > Michael T. Dean wrote:
> >
> >> <a very long response, snipped>
> >>
> > I've personally never seen the name 'video sources' as particularly
> > accurate or logical. I just got on with it & muddled through. MythTV
> > is reaching a level of exposure in its maturity where concerns about the
> > 'average' new user have to be addressed IMHO.
> >
> > Do me a favour. Ask a friend who doesn't know anything about mythtv
> > what meaning 'Video Sources' would imply to them.
>
> Oh, I completely agree with you--in spite of my long response--that the
> terminology isn't easy for a new user to understand. The OC side of me
> just has a hard time with the idea of making it less accurate regardless
> of the purpose or the results. I can't really think of any name that's
> both accurate and easy to understand so--were it my decision--I'd just
> leave it the same.
>
> I wonder, too, if the only reason that the term, "Season Pass" is easy
> to understand is because TiVo drilled the term and its meaning into our
> heads in their advertising campaign. Perhaps this is just a job for the
> marketing/sales folks. :)
>

The reason I see that "video sources" causes confusion is that
it's too generic. It already has multiple other common applications in
technologies related to MythTV. It's also accurate to call the coax
connected to your video card a video source, or to call the card a video
source. When one particular usage of the terminology is selected for the
text used within the program, it's not clear which usage is meant. And even
when you figure it out, it's hard to keep straight.
FWIW, I think it's worth some loss of accuracy for a large gain in clarity.

In the case of "Season Pass", it doesn't have any other meaning in the field
of DVRs/video technology.

-Jerry


f-myth-users at media

Nov 21, 2007, 12:07 PM

Post #22 of 46 (3756 views)
Permalink
Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:11:55 -0500
> From: Daniel Kristjansson <danielk[at]cuymedia.net>

> On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 08:21 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote:
> > Justin Hornsby wrote:

> > Yes. 'TV Guide data sources' sounds like what Schedules Direct offers.
> >
> > Something like 'TV Channel Groups' might be more descriptive of the
> > things which are contained in that container. A 'Channel Group' is
> > clearly a collection of TV channels which, as it happens, can be
> > captured by one type of defined capture card.

> Channel Group, Tuning Lineup, are both better than "TV Guide data
> sources". A single lineup provider or source can update multiple
> "Video Sources" and multiple lineup providers can update a single
> "Video Source" (EIT + XMLTV for example). When you have something
> Like DVB-S with a rotor the "Video Source" corresponds to a single
> orbital location, but multiple orbital locations may be on the
> same network getting EIT from a single transport at a single orbital
> location and multiple "Video Sources" may be associated with the
> same orbital location because satellites in different networks are
> parked in a cluster occupying the same orbital location.

This paragraph (with appropriate links to other pages) might make a
great little squib in the wiki somewhere for explaining what's going
on for new (or even not-so-new) users who are confused about the large
crossbar of possibilities in mapping where video comes from to where
listings data comes from. (Lots of examples w/pictures would be even
better, though that's a lot of work. Maybe if someone can quickly
sketch up napkin-style drawings [really! just photographed hand-drawn
stuff], someone with time & ability but w/o the domain knowledge can
then draw pretty diagrams.)

And speaking of the wiki---if "Video Sources" -does- change names, I'd
recommend a big prominent page (maybe called "Terminology" if it grows
to something more) explaining what the OLD name was, and what the NEW
name is, and WHEN it was changed, precisely so that people reading the
thousands of old pages out there (and the archives) about how to
configure their myths know how to read the older documentation.

> I don't think there is any doubt that the existing "Video Sources"
> is confusing to most people new to MythTV, and will become more so
> when/if we start doing lineups for DVB Radio and the like.

I agree. I'm hoping someone comes up with a name that most are happy with.
I absolutely agree that "Video Sources" is needlessly confusing.

The problem we're seeing here (and it's endemic to just about -all-
domains where there's an existing set of terminology that's confusingly
close to what you're trying to do, but is not quite right) is that
most plausible terms are "taken", and so using any one of them will
mislead someone.

Frankly, calling video sources "Freds" might almost be clearer---at
least newcomers don't -think- they know what a "Fred" is and thus (a)
read the documentation and (b) don't get faked out later by the
connotations of the term. This is why "Season Pass" in TiVoland
works---there's a vague analogy to sports events (and, perhaps, The
Theatre), but nobody was already using the terminology when talking
about scheduling broadcasts, so it wasn't going to confuse anyone.

> PS "TV Guide" is also a registered trademark for channel lineup
> and listings services, so we can't use that as part of the name.

Yeah, that was my first thought as well, but I assumed that it
wouldn't get too far before someone pointed that out.
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


justin at mythtvthemes

Nov 21, 2007, 12:20 PM

Post #23 of 46 (3743 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

Regarding the fact 'TV Guide' is a trademarked name - isn't 'Windows'
also trademarked? What am I supposed to say when I want to tell
somebody I've been looking out at the world through the
rectangular-shaped portals in my house? ;)
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


knowledgejunkie at gmail

Nov 21, 2007, 12:28 PM

Post #24 of 46 (3746 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

On 21/11/2007, Justin Hornsby <justin[at]mythtvthemes.co.uk> wrote:
> For some time now I've considered the possibility that 'Video Sources'
> are causing more confusion among users than necessary.
>
> Those of us more familiar with MythTV have no problem understanding the
> relationship between capture cards, card inputs & the 'video sources'.
> For new users though, the words 'video sources' more than likely conjure
> up images of actual video inputs - something that doesn't bear any
> relation to 'sources of TV Guide data'.

If we want to make things user friendly for new users (Linux, MythTV
or both) I would seriously suggest looking at how configuration is
handled in (for example) Windows MCE before changing odd page titles
and leaving the underlying setup functionality. Very clean interface,
and obvious terminology IMO.

A wizard-based approach that guides a user through everything they
need in order to configure a
card(hardware)/channels(tuning)/listings(data) from start to end - and
takes into account the differences between classes of cards, tuning
information, and listings sources by altering the required steps and
content of pages, would simplify things enormously.

As for Video Sources, 'Apply listings data to channels' gets my vote.
It describes what it is doing, and I would think new users would
immediately understand what it is going to do from the wording.
Although I might be wrong :)

Nick

--
Nick Morrott

MythTV Official wiki:
http://mythtv.org/wiki/
MythTV users list archive:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users

"An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest." - Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev


knowledgejunkie at gmail

Nov 21, 2007, 12:29 PM

Post #25 of 46 (3746 views)
Permalink
Re: Video Sources - time to call them what they are? [In reply to]

On 21/11/2007, Justin Hornsby <justin[at]mythtvthemes.co.uk> wrote:
> Regarding the fact 'TV Guide' is a trademarked name - isn't 'Windows'
> also trademarked? What am I supposed to say when I want to tell
> somebody I've been looking out at the world through the
> rectangular-shaped portals in my house? ;)

The clue is the substring 'trade' in trademark.

--
Nick Morrott

MythTV Official wiki:
http://mythtv.org/wiki/
MythTV users list archive:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users

"An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest." - Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev[at]mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All MythTV dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.