jhfoo-ml at extracktor
Feb 12, 2008, 1:38 AM
Post #3 of 3
Thanks Octavian. At least now I don't feel like I'm going crazy when all
Re: AP820 is more stable than AP822 (for mp2)
[In reply to]
I report is whether modperl can restart on Win32. :P
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> I also use build 820 with Apache 2.2.4 because 822 has the same
> problems when using a more complex mod_perl application.
> (The same problem when restarting the server...)
> When using a "Hello world" program with mod_perl, 822 is working fine
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Foo JH" <jhfoo-ml [at] extracktor>
> To: "mod_perl" <modperl [at] perl>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 5:16 AM
> Subject: AP820 is more stable than AP822 (for mp2)
>> Following the community's earlier comment on how modperl was compiled
>> against build 820 of ActivePerl, I've decided to check it out (since
>> my 822 copy is acting up a little on my mp2 setup).
>> It's not that 822 is not good for 2.2.8. I'm able to restart the
>> service on a bare-bones config. But with a lot more real-world
>> initialisation thrown in (including dynamic location registration
>> through Apache2::ServerUtil), suddenly I'm not able to restart
>> Apache. I'm not referring to service stop-start, but rather Apache's
>> own restart (via ApacheMonitor).
>> With 820, Apache restart is better now.
>> Disclaimer: This is strictly based on Win32, on ApacheLounge's 2.2.8
>> binary. I'm still not able to get a working stack on AP820 +