dougm at pobox
Feb 16, 2000, 4:43 PM
Post #1 of 2
(887 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: thoughts on cgi emulation layer
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, brian moseley wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> > I'm not convinced NG is the final solution, but
> > something like it where the functionality is broken
> > apart and re-usable, unlike the existing Registry.pm
> > where everything is all lumped in together.
>
> in order for this cgi emulation system to really make sense,
> we need to re-examine the responsibilities of the registry
> modules and perform a more explicit separation of behaviors
> into classes. this will make it much easier for everybody to
> understand their options: 1) use the strict cgi emulation
> layer; 2) use the 'bare bones' cgi emulation layer; 3) write
> your own cgi emulation layer.
I couldn't agree more! I'd *really* like to see this done and done right
for mod_perl-2.0 (which isn't far away from being underway :)
if you're up for it, it would be great to have a design and/or prototype
for others to comment on.
|
