Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: ModPerl: ModPerl
Re: highscalability.com report
 

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat


wrowe at rowe-clan

Apr 4, 2012, 1:55 PM


Views: 3041
Permalink
Re: highscalability.com report [In reply to]

On 4/4/2012 1:41 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:37 AM, demerphq <demerphq [at] gmail> wrote:
>> On 4 April 2012 09:31, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe [at] rowe-clan> wrote:
>>>
>>> When was the last time you built perl with no threading support? It's
>>> certainly a 5%-15% win.
>>
>> Not certainly. We did that and saw almost no difference.
>
> I've done two perlbench sets of comparisons with threaded/non-threaded
> across a couple different versions of perl. I don't have the results
> posted on the web anymore, but non-threaded was up to 20% faster for
> some operations.
>
> As far as real world differences go, I don't think you are likely to
> see differences with mod_perl in production environments with threaded
> vs non-threaded. That 20% increase probably only affects 1% of your
> application.

Right. The missing detail/point was that a well-tuned pool of single
threaded PHP, or Perl, or assembly coded worker processes running under
fcgid is going to outperform the in-process model, given finite cpu and
memory resources.

Subject User Time
highscalability.com report jschueler at eloquency Apr 3, 2012, 7:50 PM
    Re: highscalability.com report wrowe at rowe-clan Apr 4, 2012, 12:31 AM
        Re: highscalability.com report margol at beamartyr Apr 4, 2012, 1:03 AM
        Re: highscalability.com report demerphq at gmail Apr 4, 2012, 6:37 AM
    Re: highscalability.com report perrin at elem Apr 4, 2012, 5:31 AM
    Re: highscalability.com report rolf.b.mr at gmail Apr 4, 2012, 6:13 AM
    Re: highscalability.com report mike at acorg Apr 4, 2012, 6:16 AM
    Re: highscalability.com report aw at ice-sa Apr 4, 2012, 7:21 AM
        Re: highscalability.com report discobeta at gmail Apr 4, 2012, 7:23 AM
    Re: highscalability.com report dave.morgan at coolplaces Apr 4, 2012, 7:36 AM
        Re: highscalability.com report randolf at modperl Apr 4, 2012, 5:15 PM
    Re: highscalability.com report milu71 at gmx Apr 4, 2012, 11:27 AM
    Re: highscalability.com report fred at redhotpenguin Apr 4, 2012, 11:41 AM
    Re: highscalability.com report davehodg at gmail Apr 4, 2012, 12:26 PM
    Re: highscalability.com report wrowe at rowe-clan Apr 4, 2012, 1:55 PM
        Re: highscalability.com report davehodg at gmail Apr 5, 2012, 2:58 AM
    Re: highscalability.com report clint at traveljury Apr 12, 2012, 7:00 AM
        Re: highscalability.com report mpeters at plusthree Apr 12, 2012, 7:05 AM
        Re: highscalability.com report orasnita at gmail Apr 12, 2012, 10:01 AM
            RE: highscalability.com report eric.berg at barclays Apr 12, 2012, 10:14 AM
    RE: highscalability.com report jschueler at eloquency Apr 12, 2012, 10:23 AM
    Re: highscalability.com report davehodg at gmail Apr 15, 2012, 10:21 AM
    RE: highscalability.com report vv.lists at wanadoo Apr 16, 2012, 3:39 AM
        Re: highscalability.com report fred at redhotpenguin Apr 17, 2012, 10:04 AM
    Re: highscalability.com report vv.lists at wanadoo Apr 17, 2012, 2:46 PM

  Index | Next | Previous | View Flat
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.