online.jerry at gmail
Jul 19, 2011, 9:55 AM
Post #4 of 6
I agree, but isn't the Handler tightly coupled to the URI? rather if i can
Re: Single PerlResponseHander for Web Application
[In reply to]
configure the mapping of URI and sub-handlers in a different configuration
file or database, it will be easier to handle URI changes.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Perrin Harkins <perrin [at] elem> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Jerry Pereira <online.jerry [at] gmail>
> > Single PerlResponseHandler for my application, all requests will be
> > submitted to this handler, the handler will then dispatch the request to
> > appropriate sub-handlers based on the URI path.
> Sounds like Apache2::Dispatch to me.
> > I also thought of using Apache2::Dispatch,
> > but i believe it requires that each path has its own handler configured
> > httpd.conf file (please correct me if I am wrong)
> You're confused about this one. Eliminating the need to add each
> class to httpd.conf is the main reason that Dispatch exists.
> - Perrin
Your clothes may be the latest in style but you aint completely dressed
until you wear a smile!
Keep smiling : )