Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 06 Jul 2008 20:10:51 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Finally, it's here and it works with Perl 5.10! http://apache.org/dist/perl/mod_perl-2.0.4.tar.gz http://apache.org/dist/perl/mod_perl-2.0.4.tar.gz.a 17 Apr 2008 00:16:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/96988 Quoting Fred Moyer <fred@taperfriendlymusic.org>: > > Spend time developing mod_perl related talks and submit them to events. > I spent a lot of time 02 Apr 2008 13:46:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/96852 adam.prime@utoronto.ca wrote: > Quoting Geoffrey Young <geoff@modperlcookbook.org>: > >> hi all :) >> >> perl's (and mod_perl's) presence at apacheco 02 Apr 2008 12:40:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/96851 Quoting Geoffrey Young <geoff@modperlcookbook.org>: > hi all :) > > perl's (and mod_perl's) presence at apachecon has been dwindling over > the years 02 Apr 2008 10:46:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/96846 Adam Prime wrote: > I realize this list has been completely dead for a year now, but i'll > give this a shot anyway. I saw this today. > > http://p 08 Dec 2007 20:50:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/95850 I realize this list has been completely dead for a year now, but i'll give this a shot anyway. I saw this today. http://perlbuzz.com/mechanix/2007/ 08 Dec 2007 20:25:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/95849 http://apache.org/dist/perl/mod_perl-2.0.3.tar.gz http://apache.org/dist/perl/mod_perl-2.0.3.tar.gz.asc (pgp sig) The package is also available on CP 29 Nov 2006 01:00:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/91558 On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:06:21 +0200 "A. Cihangir Baltaci" <cbaltaci@turkisp.com> wrote: > Hi, > > My Webserver is Apache/2.0.40 with Perl 5.8.0 and m 23 Dec 2005 09:40:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/86286 Hi, My Webserver is Apache/2.0.40 with Perl 5.8.0 and mod_perl-1.99_07-5 on a RH9 box. A simple perl script can see everything on the server. The sy 23 Dec 2005 05:06:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/86279 The URL http://perl.apache.org/dist/mod_perl-2.0.2.tar.gz has entered CPAN as file: $CPAN/authors/id/P/PG/PGOLLUCCI/mod_perl-2.0.2.tar.gz 20 Oct 2005 18:39:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/85184 >Perrin Harkins wrote: >> On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 14:20 -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: >> >>>Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >>> >>>>Perrin Harkins wrote: >> 17 Jun 2005 02:18:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/82141 Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 14:20 -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: > >>Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> >>>Perrin Harkins wrote: >>> >>> >>>>A 30 May 2005 01:08:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81825 On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 14:20 -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > Perrin Harkins wrote: > > > >> Are you talking about separate p 28 May 2005 20:16:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81804 On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 17:45 +0800, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > Why not stick this draft in subversion somewhere in docs/ so we can more easily > sub 28 May 2005 20:09:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81803 Stas Bekman wrote: > Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > >>> Apache Software Foundation Releases mod_perl 2.0, Bringing Full Apache 2 >>> API to Perl Devel 24 May 2005 03:33:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81669 Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2005 1:43 pm, Stas Bekman wrote: > >>Perrin, one more thing you may want to mention. Quoting Robert Spier: > 24 May 2005 02:45:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81668 On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:24:04PM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2005 2:49 am, Stas Bekman wrote: > > should mention that input can 24 May 2005 00:26:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81663 Joe Schaefer wrote: > Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> writes: > > >>Let's ask Joe. Joe, what do you think, should we announce libapreq as >>a part of 23 May 2005 11:42:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81616 Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> writes: > Let's ask Joe. Joe, what do you think, should we announce libapreq as > a part of mod_perl 2.0 press release? 23 May 2005 11:29:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81641 Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2005 1:43 pm, Stas Bekman wrote: > >>Perrin, one more thing you may want to mention. Quoting Robert Spier: > 23 May 2005 11:21:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81615 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Perrin Harkins wrote: > >> Are you talking about separate pools of interpreters perl vhost? Is >> that really working? 23 May 2005 11:20:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81614 Perrin Harkins wrote: >Are you talking about separate pools of interpreters perl vhost? Is that >really working? > > I donn't think is works yet 23 May 2005 11:05:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81613 On Monday 23 May 2005 1:43 pm, Stas Bekman wrote: > Perrin, one more thing you may want to mention. Quoting Robert Spier: > > qpsmtpd (qmail-perl-smtp 23 May 2005 10:52:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81611 Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2005 2:49 am, Stas Bekman wrote: > >>should mention that input can be filtered as well. > > > What's a goo 23 May 2005 10:46:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81610 Perrin, one more thing you may want to mention. Quoting Robert Spier: qpsmtpd (qmail-perl-smtpd, which really doesn't have much to do with qmail anym 23 May 2005 10:43:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81609 On Monday 23 May 2005 11:05 am, Jim Martinez wrote: > Consider deleting "new" or replacing with altering to "Prominent new or > improved features..." 23 May 2005 10:29:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81608 On Monday 23 May 2005 10:03 am, Frank Wiles wrote: > Other than the docs I noticed we don't seem to have any mp2 articles > listed on http://perl. 23 May 2005 10:27:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81607 On Monday 23 May 2005 2:49 am, Stas Bekman wrote: > should mention that input can be filtered as well. What's a good example application for that? > 23 May 2005 10:24:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81606 On Monday 23 May 2005 2:45 am, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > I'd try and mention something about APR as well in there. Not too much, > but some. Can 23 May 2005 10:17:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81612 Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: >Perrin Harkins wrote: > > >>Okay, this is what I have so far. Keep in mind that is targeted at >>quasi-technical publ 23 May 2005 09:08:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81603 My $0.0244 CND, consisting of tiny suggestions follows. On May 23 Perrin Harkins wrote: > With this release, it is now possible to write Apache 2 we 23 May 2005 08:05:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81595 hi guys. I guess I wasn't subscribed when perrin posted the draft... everything looks good to me. I was even more eloquent than I remember ;) the 23 May 2005 07:55:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81594 On Mon, 23 May 2005 02:49:07 -0400 Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> wrote: > Perrin++! > > Thanks for doing this work, Perrin! I agree with the the 23 May 2005 07:03:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81593 Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: >>Apache Software Foundation Releases mod_perl 2.0, Bringing Full Apache 2 >>API to Perl Developers > > > Should we cal 22 May 2005 23:51:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81586 Perrin Harkins wrote: > Okay, this is what I have so far. Keep in mind that is targeted at > quasi-technical publications like InfoWorld as well as g 22 May 2005 23:49:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81585 Perrin Harkins wrote: > Okay, this is what I have so far. Keep in mind that is targeted at > quasi-technical publications like InfoWorld as well as g 22 May 2005 23:45:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81584 Okay, this is what I have so far. Keep in mind that is targeted at quasi-technical publications like InfoWorld as well as geekier ones like Linux Jou 22 May 2005 23:05:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/81583 * Roland Moriz (roland@moriz.de) wrote: > there is #modperl on irc.perl.org To bad no one hardly says anything in the channel. Some advertising via 16 Jan 2005 14:55:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/77620 +1 Pratik [15/01/05 17:03 +0530]: > Hi Everyone ! > > I noticed one thing about mod_perl. It's just mod_perl mailing lists > where uses communicate/ 15 Jan 2005 17:43:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/77608 Pratik wrote: > - IRC > If it's fine with ppl.. > there is #modperl on irc.perl.org regards, Roland (rmoriz on irc.perl.org) ------------------- 15 Jan 2005 03:43:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/77591 Hi Everyone ! I noticed one thing about mod_perl. It's just mod_perl mailing lists where uses communicate/discuss mod_perl. When it comes to PHP, you 15 Jan 2005 03:33:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/77590 Perrin Harkins wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wanted to report that I have been having an easy time gathering > good stories from business users of mp2 to 05 Jan 2005 06:51:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/77183 Hi all, Just wanted to report that I have been having an easy time gathering good stories from business users of mp2 to include in the press release. 04 Jan 2005 15:34:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/77172 On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:30:28 +0200, Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net> wrote: > the "use module version" pragma only goes one way: up. > > Iss 29 Dec 2004 23:01:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76992 I might have misunderstood , Sorry. I just love mod_perl so much :) Paul Andreas J Koenig wrote: >>>>>>On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:54:27 -0500, Stas 28 Dec 2004 11:12:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76922 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> To: "Issac Goldstand" <margol@beamartyr.net> Cc: <advocacy@perl.apach 28 Dec 2004 09:30:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76859 >>>>> "Issac" == Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net> writes: Issac> Which is exactly the point that I was trying to make: This *should* be Issac> 28 Dec 2004 09:09:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76858 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> To: "Stas Bekman" <stas@stason.org> Cc: <advocacy@perl.apache.org>; " 28 Dec 2004 08:58:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76857 >>>>> "Stas" == Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> writes: Stas> Unfortunately thanks to Randal, people are now totally confused. No, I think thanks to m 28 Dec 2004 08:43:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76856 Issac Goldstand wrote: [...] > After all, users must set up seperate Apache > distributions for mp 1 and 2. When you think about it, it's really a 28 Dec 2004 08:27:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76855 I personally side with Stas' intentions (if I understand them correctly) on the matter - it makes it easy for developers to work with both versions o 28 Dec 2004 08:11:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76840 >>>>> On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:54:27 -0500, Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> said: > Cure wrote: >> Everybody needs to "STEP BACK" and realize how much 28 Dec 2004 08:11:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76921 On Dec 27, 2004, at 9:58 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: > I think all you need to do is to write an equivalent of WriteMakefile > (and some other bits). The 28 Dec 2004 08:01:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76839 Cure wrote: > Everybody needs to "STEP BACK" and realize how much work and soul Stas > has put into mod_perl. > He deserves A LOT OF CREDIT. Keep up 28 Dec 2004 07:54:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76838 Everybody needs to "STEP BACK" and realize how much work and soul Stas has put into mod_perl. He deserves A LOT OF CREDIT. Keep up the Good work Stas 28 Dec 2004 07:30:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76920 Andreas J Koenig wrote: >>>>>>On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:09:07 -0500, Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> said: > > > >> Will it not also affect us who build 28 Dec 2004 07:01:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76837 >>>>> On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:09:07 -0500, Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> said: >> Will it not also affect us who build mod_perl applications and want 28 Dec 2004 06:28:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76919 David Wheeler wrote: > On Dec 27, 2004, at 9:09 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: > >> You mean Apache::TestMB. > > > Yeah, that ole thing. :-) > >> I know s 27 Dec 2004 21:58:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76826 On Dec 27, 2004, at 9:09 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: > You mean Apache::TestMB. Yeah, that ole thing. :-) > I know someone who's name is David who can e 27 Dec 2004 21:29:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76825 Stas Bekman wrote: > David Wheeler wrote: > >> On Dec 27, 2004, at 7:36 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote: >> >>> the only kink here would be third-party CPAN 27 Dec 2004 21:19:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76824 David Wheeler wrote: > On Dec 27, 2004, at 7:36 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote: > >> the only kink here would be third-party CPAN modules for only mp2 - th 27 Dec 2004 21:09:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76823 On Dec 27, 2004, at 7:36 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote: > the only kink here would be third-party CPAN modules for only mp2 - > those > are _required_ to 27 Dec 2004 20:53:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76822 Geoffrey Young wrote: > I don't think we expect CPAN to grok Apache2, just the local filesystem and > @INC. but you're right, the entire perldoc/CPA 27 Dec 2004 07:47:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76791 > I *want* modperl to succeed. I *want* modperl2 to succeed. good :) > I believe > Stas has made two significant errors in this process, however: 27 Dec 2004 07:36:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76811 >>>>> "Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young <geoff@modperlcookbook.org> writes: Geoffrey> I can't say how disappointed I am in this post, and your Geoffrey> b 27 Dec 2004 07:09:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76790 Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >>>>>>"Stas" == Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> writes: > > > Stas> My submission to /.org made it to the Apache section: > 27 Dec 2004 07:01:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76812 > Stas> My submission to /.org made it to the Apache section: > Stas> > <http://apache.slashdot.org/apache/04/12/25/1414211.shtml? > tid=145&tid=2> 26 Dec 2004 20:29:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76783 >>>>> "Stas" == Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> writes: Stas> My submission to /.org made it to the Apache section: Stas> <http://apache.slashdot.org/a 26 Dec 2004 12:34:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76743 My submission to /.org made it to the Apache section: <http://apache.slashdot.org/apache/04/12/25/1414211.shtml?tid=145&tid=2> It's about asking to he 26 Dec 2004 11:57:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76737 On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 21:04 +0100, allan juul wrote: > aha - hmm, if that's the case why aren't *we* worried about people > upgrading to Apache2 like 22 Dec 2004 12:30:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76611 On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 21:04:03 +0100 allan juul <lambretta@inet.uni2.dk> wrote: > Perrin Harkins wrote: > > > On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 07:56 +0100, allan 22 Dec 2004 12:21:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76610 allan juul wrote: > Perrin Harkins wrote: > >> On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 07:56 +0100, allan juul wrote: >> >>> it would be cool if it somehow somehwhere 22 Dec 2004 12:20:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76609 Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 07:56 +0100, allan juul wrote: > >>it would be cool if it somehow somehwhere were more "visible" for e 22 Dec 2004 12:04:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76607 On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 07:56 +0100, allan juul wrote: > it would be cool if it somehow somehwhere were more "visible" for everybody. > for instance, i 22 Dec 2004 08:25:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76603 Quoting Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org>: > > also, i don't know if this true, but i like the idea of mod_perl being > > an Apache module more than a p 21 Dec 2004 22:56:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76588 > also, i don't know if this true, but i like the idea of mod_perl being > an Apache module more than a perl module. And i like the idea of > mod_pe 21 Dec 2004 15:33:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76561 Jayce^ wrote: > So, today's slashdot actually had a discussion on php problems with apache 2. > Seems like something worth capitalizing on for mod_p 21 Dec 2004 15:14:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76560 Jayce^ wrote: > So, today's slashdot actually had a discussion on php problems with apache 2. > Seems like something worth capitalizing on for mod_p 21 Dec 2004 14:56:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76559 > On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 23:25 +0000, Tom Gazzini wrote: > > The reason I say this is that, when I first started researching > mod_perl, > > about 1.5 21 Dec 2004 14:40:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76558 So, today's slashdot actually had a discussion on php problems with apache 2. Seems like something worth capitalizing on for mod_perl. Sure, a lot 21 Dec 2004 14:35:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76557 I will be out of the office starting 21/12/2004 and will not return until 02/01/2005. I have only limited access to email, in urgent cases please ca 21 Dec 2004 08:46:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76536 Perrin, I think this is a nice summary of libapreq2 Joe just posted that can be included in the PR as an incentive to upgrade to mp2. -------- Or 21 Dec 2004 08:37:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76535 Stas Bekman wrote: > Tom Gazzini wrote: > >> By judicious use of keywords in these articles, you can try >> and ensure that they get to the top of se 21 Dec 2004 05:53:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76526 Tom Gazzini wrote: [...] >>Any ideas how to fix that situation? go after the old articles and ask to >>change them? > > > I wouldn't recommend that 18 Dec 2004 08:33:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76448 On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 23:25 +0000, Tom Gazzini wrote: > The reason I say this is that, when I first started researching mod_perl, > about 1.5 short ye 18 Dec 2004 07:17:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76446 > -----Original Message----- > From: Stas Bekman [mailto:stas@stason.org] > Sent: 17 December 2004 23:34 > To: advocacy@perl.apache.org > Subject: Re: 18 Dec 2004 05:45:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76442 Tom Gazzini wrote: >>Can we collect enough for a NY Times ad? :) >>http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=5781 > > > Making the NY Times i 17 Dec 2004 15:33:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76423 > Can we collect enough for a NY Times ad? :) > http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=5781 Making the NY Times is one thing. However, I th 17 Dec 2004 15:25:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76422 Frank Wiles wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:15:14 -0500 > Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> wrote: > > >>Will there be a problem if the press release is 17 Dec 2004 15:03:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76421 On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:15:14 -0500 Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> wrote: > Will there be a problem if the press release is done a week or 2 weeks > af 17 Dec 2004 15:00:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76420 Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 17:15 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: > >>Will there be a problem if the press release is done a week or 2 we 17 Dec 2004 14:59:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76419 On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 17:15 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: > Will there be a problem if the press release is done a week or 2 weeks > after the release? w 17 Dec 2004 14:53:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76418 Frank Wiles wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:45:13 -0500 > Perrin Harkins <perrin@elem.com> wrote: > > >>On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 17:30 -0500, Stas Bekm 17 Dec 2004 14:16:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76398 Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 17:30 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: > >>So if someone could volunteer to lead the >>effort of satisfying t 17 Dec 2004 14:15:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76397 On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 14:16 -0600, Frank Wiles wrote: > Should we use one of the press release blasting > services to send it out? I think that 17 Dec 2004 12:42:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76396 On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Frank Wiles wrote: > I second that! Should we use one of the press release blasting > services to send it out? I'd be willin 17 Dec 2004 12:37:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76395 On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:45:13 -0500 Perrin Harkins <perrin@elem.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 17:30 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: > > So if someone 17 Dec 2004 12:16:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76394 On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 17:30 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: > So if someone could volunteer to lead the > effort of satisfying the listed below requirement 17 Dec 2004 10:45:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76387 OK, I've contacted the group responsible for Press Releases at ASF and they gave us the guidelines which you can find below. Now, I really have to c 16 Dec 2004 14:30:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76354 Stas Bekman wrote: > Perrin Harkins wrote: > >> On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 14:38 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: >> >>> I think you are talking about something 15 Dec 2004 13:56:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/advocacy/76275