roberto.colistete at gmail
Nov 5, 2011, 8:10 AM
Post #6 of 6
Excellent. I replied to your first post asking you to list the
extras-testing links so that users can vote to promote the packages.
Ah confirm that only the "user/..." section packages need voting
from extras-testing to extras. The other ones which are dependencies are
Em 05-11-2011 13:06, Neal H. Walfield escreveu:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I prefer reading mailing lists and blogs
> and I assume everyone is like me :-). I've created a thread on TMO:
> At Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:33:06 -0200,
> Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote:
>> Hi Neal,
>> Why not announce Woodchuck on Talk Maemo.org (section "Applications") ?
>> Hundreds of users will know about it.
>> Best regards,
>> Em 05-11-2011 10:50, Neal H. Walfield escreveu:
>>> Hi, All,
>>> I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and
>>> usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile
>>> devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've
>>> observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and
>>> Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my
>>> cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the
>>> content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely
>>> bothers me.
>>> To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages.
>>> Here are the links to the packages:
>>> Thanks for your help!
>>> maemo-developers mailing list
>>> maemo-developers [at] maemo
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers [at] maemo