Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Maemo: Developers

Woodchuck package review

 

 

Maemo developers RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


neal at walfield

Nov 5, 2011, 5:50 AM

Post #1 of 6 (478 views)
Permalink
Woodchuck package review

Hi, All,

I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and
usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile
devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've
observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and
Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my
cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the
content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely
bothers me.

To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages.
Here are the links to the packages:

http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~20111102-7/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~20111102-7/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/

Thanks for your help!

Neal
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers [at] maemo
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


andrew at bleb

Nov 5, 2011, 6:00 AM

Post #2 of 6 (463 views)
Permalink
Re: Woodchuck package review [In reply to]

For the packahes which aren't in "Section: user/..." they will be promoted automatically as dependencies of things which relu on them.

I haven't checked your packages yet, but that should reduce the review burden.

Hope that helps,

Andrew

--
Andrew Flegg | mailto:andrew [at] bleb -- http://www.bleb.org/On 05/11/2011 12:50 Neal H. Walfield wrote:
Hi, All,

I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and
usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile
devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've
observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and
Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my
cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the
content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely
bothers me.

To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages.
Here are the links to the packages:

http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~20111102-7/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~20111102-7/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/

Thanks for your help!

Neal
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers [at] maemo
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers [at] maemo
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


neal at walfield

Nov 5, 2011, 6:32 AM

Post #3 of 6 (463 views)
Permalink
Re: Woodchuck package review [In reply to]

Hi, Andrew,

At Sat, 5 Nov 2011 13:00:20 +0000,
andrew [at] bleb wrote:
> For the packahes which aren't in "Section: user/..." they will be
> promoted automatically as dependencies of things which relu on them.

I wasn't aware of that, thanks! That means there are only three
packages that need review:

http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~20111102-7/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~20111102-7/

Thanks,

Neal
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers [at] maemo
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


roberto.colistete at gmail

Nov 5, 2011, 7:33 AM

Post #4 of 6 (461 views)
Permalink
Re: Woodchuck package review [In reply to]

Hi Neal,

Why not announce Woodchuck on Talk Maemo.org (section "Applications") ?

Hundreds of users will know about it.

Best regards,

Roberto

Em 05-11-2011 10:50, Neal H. Walfield escreveu:
> Hi, All,
>
> I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and
> usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile
> devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've
> observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and
> Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my
> cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the
> content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely
> bothers me.
>
> To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages.
> Here are the links to the packages:
>
> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~20111102-7/
> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~20111102-7/
> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Neal
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-developers mailing list
> maemo-developers [at] maemo
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers [at] maemo
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


neal at walfield

Nov 5, 2011, 8:06 AM

Post #5 of 6 (465 views)
Permalink
Re: Woodchuck package review [In reply to]

Thanks for the suggestion. I prefer reading mailing lists and blogs
and I assume everyone is like me :-). I've created a thread on TMO:

http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=79707

Neal

At Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:33:06 -0200,
Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote:
>
> Hi Neal,
>
> Why not announce Woodchuck on Talk Maemo.org (section "Applications") ?
>
> Hundreds of users will know about it.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Roberto
>
> Em 05-11-2011 10:50, Neal H. Walfield escreveu:
> > Hi, All,
> >
> > I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and
> > usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile
> > devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've
> > observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and
> > Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my
> > cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the
> > content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely
> > bothers me.
> >
> > To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages.
> > Here are the links to the packages:
> >
> > http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~20111102-7/
> > http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
> > http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
> > http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~20111102-7/
> > http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
> >
> > Thanks for your help!
> >
> > Neal
> > _______________________________________________
> > maemo-developers mailing list
> > maemo-developers [at] maemo
> > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
>
>
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers [at] maemo
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


roberto.colistete at gmail

Nov 5, 2011, 8:10 AM

Post #6 of 6 (467 views)
Permalink
Re: Woodchuck package review [In reply to]

Excellent. I replied to your first post asking you to list the
extras-testing links so that users can vote to promote the packages.

Ah confirm that only the "user/..." section packages need voting
from extras-testing to extras. The other ones which are dependencies are
then promoted.

Em 05-11-2011 13:06, Neal H. Walfield escreveu:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I prefer reading mailing lists and blogs
> and I assume everyone is like me :-). I've created a thread on TMO:
>
> http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=79707
>
> Neal
>
> At Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:33:06 -0200,
> Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote:
>> Hi Neal,
>>
>> Why not announce Woodchuck on Talk Maemo.org (section "Applications") ?
>>
>> Hundreds of users will know about it.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Roberto
>>
>> Em 05-11-2011 10:50, Neal H. Walfield escreveu:
>>> Hi, All,
>>>
>>> I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and
>>> usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile
>>> devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've
>>> observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and
>>> Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my
>>> cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the
>>> content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely
>>> bothers me.
>>>
>>> To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages.
>>> Here are the links to the packages:
>>>
>>> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~20111102-7/
>>> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
>>> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
>>> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~20111102-7/
>>> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help!
>>>
>>> Neal
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> maemo-developers mailing list
>>> maemo-developers [at] maemo
>>> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
>>

_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers [at] maemo
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Maemo developers RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.