Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Maemo: Developers

why is gtk20-l10n package in 'non-free' ?

 

 

Maemo developers RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


chpe at gnome

Nov 24, 2009, 10:17 AM

Post #1 of 2 (411 views)
Permalink
why is gtk20-l10n package in 'non-free' ?

Hi;

I had a look at the
http://repository.maemo.org/dists/fremantle/sdk/non-free/binary-armel/Packages.gz
packages file, and was amazed to find the gtk+ translations in there.
Its source package appears to be
http://repository.maemo.org/pool/fremantle/free/g/gtk20-l10n/gtk20-l10n_4.5+0m5.tar.gz
— in 'free' !

The package's copyright file says:
"
This package (gtk20-l10n) was created by Nokia
L10n Team, contact <l10n [at] maemo> for questions.

Based on the Gtk+ translations.
The original translations are under the LGPL.
"

Firstly, this doesn't clearly say which licence this package pretends to
be available under.

More importantly, these translations are 'based on'
the original gtk translations, which are LGPL2+, and they are
translations of strings that are LGPL2+ since gtk+ is LGPL2+. As
translations are derived works, these translations are themselves
clearly [L]GPL too.

So this package should be in 'free'.

Finally, the source .tar.gz is missing a copy of the LGPL.

Regards,
Christian
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers [at] maemo
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


mohammed.2.hassan at nokia

Nov 25, 2009, 6:15 AM

Post #2 of 2 (367 views)
Permalink
Re: why is gtk20-l10n package in 'non-free' ? [In reply to]

Hi Christian,

I'm the one who created these packages a year or so ago. It's probably
my mistake that it went unnoticed.

CC'ing our l10n people so they can do something as there's nothing I can
do about it now.

Oksan, This seems like a GPL violation. I'm not sure as I have no time
to investigate it but please check what's needed to open up gtk20-l10n
as it's based on community work.

Cheers,

On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 19:17 +0100, ext Christian Persch wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I had a look at the
> http://repository.maemo.org/dists/fremantle/sdk/non-free/binary-armel/Packages.gz
> packages file, and was amazed to find the gtk+ translations in there.
> Its source package appears to be
> http://repository.maemo.org/pool/fremantle/free/g/gtk20-l10n/gtk20-l10n_4.5+0m5.tar.gz
> — in 'free' !
>
> The package's copyright file says:
> "
> This package (gtk20-l10n) was created by Nokia
> L10n Team, contact <l10n [at] maemo> for questions.
>
> Based on the Gtk+ translations.
> The original translations are under the LGPL.
> "
>
> Firstly, this doesn't clearly say which licence this package pretends to
> be available under.
>
> More importantly, these translations are 'based on'
> the original gtk translations, which are LGPL2+, and they are
> translations of strings that are LGPL2+ since gtk+ is LGPL2+. As
> translations are derived works, these translations are themselves
> clearly [L]GPL too.
>
> So this package should be in 'free'.
>
> Finally, the source .tar.gz is missing a copy of the LGPL.
>
> Regards,
> Christian
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-developers mailing list
> maemo-developers [at] maemo
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
--
Senior Software Engineer
Maemo Software

_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers [at] maemo
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Maemo developers RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.