Mailing List Archive: Maemo: Developers

Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

byte at aeon

Jun 8, 2005, 2:39 PM

Post #1 of 8 (275 views)
Permalink

Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure

So, anyone go around and install the scratchbox rpms?

I got this:

2:scratchbox-core ###########################################
[100%]
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void
*) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!
error: %post(scratchbox-core-0.9.8.4-1.i386) scriptlet failed, exit
status 127

System is Fedora Core 4, with SELinux enabled.

Then when I go on to /scratchbox to perform run_me_first.sh, I get the
same error:

./run_me_first.sh
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void
*) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!

Anyone else seen this?

Regards
--
Colin Charles, http://www.bytebot.net/

tsavola at movial

Jun 8, 2005, 2:48 PM

Post #2 of 8 (264 views)
Permalink

Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure [In reply to]

On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 16:24 -0700, Colin Charles wrote:

> ./run_me_first.sh
> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void
> *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!
>
> Anyone else seen this?

Take a look at these mails:
http://lists.scratchbox.org/pipermail/scratchbox-users/2004-August/

timo

byte at aeon

Jun 8, 2005, 10:02 PM

Post #3 of 8 (265 views)
Permalink

Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure [In reply to]

On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 17:48 +0300, Timo Savola wrote:
> > ./run_me_first.sh
> > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion
> `(void
> > *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!
> >
> > Anyone else seen this?
>
> Take a look at these mails:
> http://lists.scratchbox.org/pipermail/scratchbox-users/2004-August/

Performed:

echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
[root [at] aren ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
0

./run_me_first.sh
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void
*) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!

This time I tried it with tarballs too...

2.6.11-1.1363_FC4 is the kernel version. I'd gladly provide more
information if required...
--
Colin Charles, http://www.bytebot.net/

maemo at wipwap

Jun 9, 2005, 7:14 AM

Post #4 of 8 (263 views)
Permalink

Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure [In reply to]

Colin Charles wrote:

>On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 17:48 +0300, Timo Savola wrote:
>
>
>>> ./run_me_first.sh
>>>Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion
>>>
>>>
>>`(void
>>
>>
>>>*) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!
>>>
>>>Anyone else seen this?
>>>
>>>
>>Take a look at these mails:
>>http://lists.scratchbox.org/pipermail/scratchbox-users/2004-August/
>>
>>
>
>Performed:
>
>echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
>[root [at] aren ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
>0
>
>./run_me_first.sh
>Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void
>*) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!
>
>This time I tried it with tarballs too...
>
>2.6.11-1.1363_FC4 is the kernel version. I'd gladly provide more
>information if required...
>
>
Are you using the (not yet releast due to problems, but expected
13.june) FC4, or are you using a test 3 FC4 ?

- niels

byte at aeon

Jun 9, 2005, 3:28 PM

Post #5 of 8 (263 views)
Permalink

Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure [In reply to]

On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 09:14 +0200, Niels wrote:
> Are you using the (not yet releast due to problems, but expected
> 13.june) FC4, or are you using a test 3 FC4 ?

The only real problem was the lack of naming ;-)

I am using the not-yet-publically-released FC-4 (admitedly, that'd be
kernel revision 1369, fwiw)...
--
Colin Charles, http://www.bytebot.net/
FUDCon II @ LinuxTag
June 24-25, 2005 in Karlsruhe, Germany
http://fedoraproject.com/fudcon/

byte at aeon

Jun 15, 2005, 10:51 PM

Post #6 of 8 (263 views)
Permalink

Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure [In reply to]

On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 07:24 -0700, Colin Charles wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 09:14 +0200, Niels wrote:
> > Are you using the (not yet releast due to problems, but expected
> > 13.june) FC4, or are you using a test 3 FC4 ?
>
> The only real problem was the lack of naming ;-)
>
> I am using the not-yet-publically-released FC-4 (admitedly, that'd be
> kernel revision 1369, fwiw)...

And now, after FC-4 is released publically, with

uname -r
2.6.11-1.1369_FC4

I still get:
./run_me_first.sh
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void
*) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!

even when:
cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
0

So this is most certainly not working with FC-4. However, with FC-2,
I've managed to get this going without any issue

(and I've tried both with the RPM and just untarring into /scratchbox as
per the instructions)

Thanks
--
Colin Charles, http://www.bytebot.net/
FUDCon II @ LinuxTag
June 24-25, 2005 in Karlsruhe, Germany
http://fedoraproject.com/fudcon/

toni.willberg at movial

Jun 16, 2005, 6:11 AM

Post #7 of 8 (262 views)
Permalink

Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure [In reply to]

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 08:49 +1000, Colin Charles wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 07:24 -0700, Colin Charles wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 09:14 +0200, Niels wrote:
> > > Are you using the (not yet releast due to problems, but expected
> > > 13.june) FC4, or are you using a test 3 FC4 ?
> >
> > The only real problem was the lack of naming ;-)
> >
> > I am using the not-yet-publically-released FC-4 (admitedly, that'd be
> > kernel revision 1369, fwiw)...
>
> And now, after FC-4 is released publically, with
>
> uname -r
> 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
>
> I still get:
> ./run_me_first.sh
> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void
> *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!
>
> even when:
> cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
> 0
>
> So this is most certainly not working with FC-4. However, with FC-2,
> I've managed to get this going without any issue
>
> (and I've tried both with the RPM and just untarring into /scratchbox as
> per the instructions)
>
> Thanks

Hi.

Could you report the error with exact version numbers at Scratchbox
bugzilla: http://bugzilla.scratchbox.org/

Thanks,
Toni

byte at aeon

Jun 19, 2005, 2:29 AM

Post #8 of 8 (261 views)
Permalink

Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure [In reply to]

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 08:49 +1000, Colin Charles wrote:
> even when:
> cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
> 0
>

So the real solution to those running FC-4 is to make sure you do:

echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/vdso

exec-shield can remain at 1, that's fine, its just vdso that needs to be
turned off. Virtual .so (vdso) in FC-4 seems to be the issue

Regards
--
Colin Charles, http://www.bytebot.net/
FUDCon II @ LinuxTag
June 24-25, 2005 in Karlsruhe, Germany
http://fedoraproject.com/fudcon/

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads