tim at samoff
Jun 3, 2009, 6:38 AM
Post #2 of 5
(518 views)
Permalink
|
Hi,
> I don't expect all reporters to understand this when filing requests,
> but that's what moderators will be for...
My only concern is that moderators/triagers will become too "strict"
with this and therefore create an air of "policing" (again). It needs to
be clear that all reporters are treated with respect and that reports
that are moved to Bugzilla are done so with care, consideration, and
proper (and personal) explanation. More than Bugzilla, this needs to be
a friendly place -- I would like all community members to feel like
their requests (no matter what they are) are welcome...and even expected.
Thanks,
Tim
--
http://tim.samoff.com
Andre Klapper wrote:
> Now that maemo.org Brainstorm[1] is in the making I'd like to reach
> consensus about its scope.
>
> I want to make sure that the Brainstorm scope is more or less clear to
> everybody and will also be communicated correctly to the reporters.
>
> I was told that in Ubuntu general feature requests or changes (that
> cover more than one package) are meant for Brainstorm while package
> specific requests are usually filed in Launchpad.
>
> That's also my understanding so far for the maemo.org Brainstorm:
> Package-specific smaller or normal enhancement requests will still be
> filed in maemo.org Bugzilla.
> Crosspackage enhancement requests or "radical" package-specific ideas
> will be filed in maemo.org Brainstorm.
>
> I don't expect all reporters to understand this when filing requests,
> but that's what moderators will be for (basically the same as support
> requests in Bugzilla that should have gone to talk.maemo.org instead -
> we have a Bugsquad for this).
>
> If anybody has a different understanding of scope: Let's discuss.
>
> andre
>
> [1] http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Maemo_brainstorm
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
maemo-community [at] maemo
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
|
