<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Linux Virtual Server | Users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 12:25:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>[lvs-users] defunct checkcommand processes w/ ldirectord</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m running ldirectord with a few external checkcommands, but end up with numerous defunct processes on the system. Seems like this issue: http://a</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 16:46:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24430</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] lvs-users Digest, Vol 109, Issue 6</title>
<description>Hello  Use the source code ipvsadm-1.26.tar.gz install the lvs tool, run the make command, reported the following error: [root@lvs1 ipvsadm-1.26]#</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 17:35:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24427</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Persistence When CIP Loses Network</title>
<description>I must have something setup wrong. My goal is to load balance microsoft terminal servers and have clients connect back to the same server within the</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 18:41:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24424</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] -x (or --u-threshold) Limits Not Working Right</title>
<description>I have a pair of Windows terminal servers behind my load balancer. I want to make sure that neither terminal ever gets more than 150 connections, so I</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 08:35:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24423</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] ipvsadm not showing backup sync daemon</title>
<description>I noticed that &amp;#039;ipvsadm --list --daemon&amp;#039; was not showing the backup daemon, which appears to be running. Best explained with an example. After start</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 12:31:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24421</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Explanation of log messages - ldirectord.log</title>
<description>Hello all, I was reviewing the logs ldirector and checked the following messages in the log: -------------------------------------------------------</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 03:30:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24420</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Need help with a routing problem on my new real server</title>
<description>Hello, first of all, I am not a network guy. I know just enough to be stupid. We have a segmented network(i think that is the correct term.) Our class</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 22:52:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24418</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] moving connections across real servers</title>
<description>Hi All,  I was going thru the LVS documents and tutorial especially the high availability features supported.As per my understanding 1) When active</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 13:54:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24413</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] ldirecord IPv4 and IPv6</title>
<description>Is it possible to include the IPv4 AND IPv6 directives on the ldirectord.cf? I have two real servers that are configured with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 15:20:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24406</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Cannot figure out failover balancing</title>
<description>Hello. We are using the Redhat load balancing add-on that comes on RHEL 6. We want to have highly available MySQL; we have two co-master MySQL ser</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 17:13:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24393</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve already posted this to the piranha mailing list, but since there are some piranha users on this mailing list it makes sense to post here as well.</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 09:55:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24392</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] LVS backup router not taking role</title>
<description>Hi, all, first time poster. I recently deployed lvs (primary and backup) and ran into few issues. I turned off the primarly lvs to see backup lvs wil</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 04:11:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24385</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; redirecting by the director</title>
<description>Hi all, I am using ipvs since years, and I am really happy with it - so first of all a big thank you for that stuff! I have a host running ipvs, usi</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 01:58:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24375</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] IPVS changes in 3.0, 3.1 and 3.2</title>
<description>Hi, in an effort to keep more people up to date on recent developments to IPVS I post a report of changes for each kernel release. Sometimes I forget</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 17:08:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24373</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] IPv6 support in IPVS</title>
<description>Hello, is there a more recent document than this Wiki page ... http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/IPv6_load_balancing ... which documents the IP</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 02:56:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24370</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] ipvsadm-1.26 Makefile bug on RHEL6</title>
<description>HI, There seems a Makefile bug for RHEL6, I download ipvsadm-1.26.tar.gz&amp;lt;http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/kernel-2.6/ipvsadm-1.26.tar.gz&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>13 Jan  2012 01:22:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24367</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] LVS stats for SIP caller ID persistent services</title>
<description>Hello, My question is how to get the stats for number of SIP calls handled by LVS?. I have configured LVS for SIP load balancing with the following</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 07:15:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24359</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] KeepAlived + LVS NAT + UDP DNS + Multiple Ext VIPS = All of a sudden, responses go out on wrong VIP</title>
<description>Hi Guys, I&amp;#039;m sending this to both LVS and Keepalived mailings lists, as both technologies are involved here, and I&amp;#039;m not sure where the failure migh</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 06:53:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24358</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>Hello, We have met the following problem with &amp;quot;reverse balancing&amp;quot;. There is a set of servers (let&amp;#039;s say 10), and a load-balancer (for which we would</description>
<pubDate>05 Jan  2012 23:15:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24348</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] (no subject)</title>
<description>Hi, I have configured the LVS to load balance the SIP service. The users u1 and u3 are registered to serverA via LVS service Vip1, and users u2 and u</description>
<pubDate>03 Jan  2012 01:36:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24346</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Hi All need help. LVS_NAT REDHAT</title>
<description>HI all, I got RHEL 5.2 and want to install a LVS-NAT with two nodes for LVS and 3 nodes for apache in a test LAB.  but i am having trouble *creating</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 01:09:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24343</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] SIP Caller ID persistency</title>
<description>Hi, I have configured servers 10.11.20.31 and 10.11.20.32 as part of a SIP service 10.11.20.117 in direct server return mode. Here is the output of</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 03:34:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24341</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] LVS Fwmarks sync</title>
<description>Hello! We need to add 443 port to the same servers those already serving port 80. Decided to use Fwmarks to have persistence per real rather than per</description>
<pubDate>22 Dec  2011 07:35:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24331</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] secure_tcp and other LVS defenses not working against SYN flood</title>
<description>Hi list, I am in the process of testing LVS defenses against SYN floods and found that despite configuring the recommended sysctl variables, my LVS</description>
<pubDate>19 Dec  2011 07:37:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24329</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Looking for a speaker on Load Balancers in the San Francisco Bay Area</title>
<description>Hi, I organize the talks for #lspe, the Bay Area Large-Scale Production Engineering Meetup:  http://www.meetup.com/SF-Bay-Area-Large-Scale-Production-</description>
<pubDate>17 Dec  2011 09:48:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24327</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

