<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Linux Virtual Server | Users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 15:38:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] defunct checkcommand processes w/ ldirectord</title>
<description>On 2/11/12 3:34 AM, Sohgo Takeuchi wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Please try the following patch. Great! That worked. Thanks! David ____________________________________</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 06:36:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24433</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ldirecord IPv4 and IPv6</title>
<description>Hello, Kevin From: Kevin &amp;lt;herve.lou@gmail.com&amp;gt; | &amp;gt; Is it possible to include the IPv4 AND IPv6 directives on the ldirectord.cf? Yes, it is. &amp;gt; I hav</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 01:35:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24432</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] defunct checkcommand processes w/ ldirectord</title>
<description>Hello, David From: David Coulson &amp;lt;david@davidcoulson.net&amp;gt; | &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m running ldirectord with a few external checkcommands, but end up &amp;gt; with numerous d</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 00:34:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24431</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] defunct checkcommand processes w/ ldirectord</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m running ldirectord with a few external checkcommands, but end up with numerous defunct processes on the system. Seems like this issue: http://a</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 16:46:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24430</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] -x (or --u-threshold) Limits Not Working Right</title>
<description>&amp;gt;    The algorithm counts both active and inactive &amp;gt; connections when checking the threshold, i.e. states before &amp;gt; and after ESTABLISHED. &amp;gt; It hu</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 04:46:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24429</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] lvs-users Digest, Vol 109, Issue 6</title>
<description>On 02/09/2012 07:35 PM, 饶俊明 wrote: &amp;gt; Hello &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Use the source code ipvsadm-1.26.tar.gz install the lvs tool, run the make command, reported the</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 17:56:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24428</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] lvs-users Digest, Vol 109, Issue 6</title>
<description>Hello  Use the source code ipvsadm-1.26.tar.gz install the lvs tool, run the make command, reported the following error: [root@lvs1 ipvsadm-1.26]#</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 17:35:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24427</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 13:26 +0000, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; How do you keep your ldirector config files in sync? Shared filesystem, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; svn/cv</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 02:07:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24426</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] -x (or --u-threshold) Limits Not Working Right</title>
<description>Hello, On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Robinson, Eric wrote: &amp;gt; I have a pair of Windows terminal servers behind my load balancer. I &amp;gt; want to make sure that nei</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 00:03:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24425</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Persistence When CIP Loses Network</title>
<description>I must have something setup wrong. My goal is to load balance microsoft terminal servers and have clients connect back to the same server within the</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 18:41:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24424</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] -x (or --u-threshold) Limits Not Working Right</title>
<description>I have a pair of Windows terminal servers behind my load balancer. I want to make sure that neither terminal ever gets more than 150 connections, so I</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 08:35:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24423</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvsadm not showing backup sync daemon</title>
<description>On 02/07/2012 02:31 PM, Ryan O&amp;#039;Hara wrote: &amp;gt; I noticed that &amp;#039;ipvsadm --list --daemon&amp;#039; was not showing the backup &amp;gt; daemon, which appears to be running</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 18:17:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24422</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] ipvsadm not showing backup sync daemon</title>
<description>I noticed that &amp;#039;ipvsadm --list --daemon&amp;#039; was not showing the backup daemon, which appears to be running. Best explained with an example. After start</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 12:31:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24421</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Explanation of log messages - ldirectord.log</title>
<description>Hello all, I was reviewing the logs ldirector and checked the following messages in the log: -------------------------------------------------------</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 03:30:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24420</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Need help with a routing problem on my new real server</title>
<description>On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 00:52 -0600, Randy Paries wrote: &amp;gt; my problem is that when I am on REAL_SERVER_2(and i have httpd &amp;gt; stopped) and try to wget htt</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 01:58:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24419</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Need help with a routing problem on my new real server</title>
<description>Hello, first of all, I am not a network guy. I know just enough to be stupid. We have a segmented network(i think that is the correct term.) Our class</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 22:52:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24418</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] moving connections across real servers</title>
<description>Someone tested lvs with conntrackd? Maybe this could help you ! conntrackd: In short, yes. The daemon *conntrackd* synchronizes the states among sev</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 13:18:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24417</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] moving connections across real servers</title>
<description>On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 02:05:25PM -0500, krishna prasad wrote: &amp;gt; Any feed-back on this? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Thanks &amp;gt; Prasad. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:54 PM, kr</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 14:22:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24416</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] moving connections across real servers</title>
<description>On 2/3/12 4:54 PM, krishna prasad wrote: &amp;gt; Assuming that my understanding is correct, how complex or big to have a &amp;gt; feature to support moving connect</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 11:16:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24415</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] moving connections across real servers</title>
<description>Any feed-back on this? Thanks Prasad. On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:54 PM, krishna prasad &amp;lt;krishna.sirigiri@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; Hi All, &amp;gt;  I was going</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 11:05:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24414</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] moving connections across real servers</title>
<description>Hi All,  I was going thru the LVS documents and tutorial especially the high availability features supported.As per my understanding 1) When active</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 13:54:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24413</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ldirecord IPv4 and IPv6</title>
<description>Hi Kevin, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 06:20:39PM -0500, Kevin wrote: &amp;gt; Is it possible to include the IPv4 AND IPv6 directives on the ldirectord.cf? &amp;gt; I h</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 22:32:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24412</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>On 01/29/2012 09:59 PM, Emilio Campos wrote: &amp;gt; HI Dennis , thanks about your quick look of the zen source code, like you &amp;gt; said Zen uses perl CGI to m</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 16:07:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24411</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>HI Dennis , thanks about your quick look of the zen source code, like you said Zen uses perl CGI to make the GUI , but Zen isn&amp;#039;t basicaly a perl CGI G</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 12:59:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24410</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>On 01/28/2012 09:02 PM, Emilio Campos wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The source code is included on the metadistro, the entire code is on &amp;gt; /usr/local/zenloadb</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 17:29:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24409</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>Hi, the direct url to the DEB package is there: http://www.zenloadbalancer.com/apt/x86/v2/zenloadbalancer_2.deb Regards, Laura. On 1/28/12, Emilio</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 12:18:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24408</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>Hi guys, The source code is included on the metadistro, the entire code is on /usr/local/zenloadbalancer, we base the soluion on debian but if someon</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 12:02:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24407</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] ldirecord IPv4 and IPv6</title>
<description>Is it possible to include the IPv4 AND IPv6 directives on the ldirectord.cf? I have two real servers that are configured with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 15:20:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24406</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>That&amp;#039;s where I looked but I only see a rather old file &amp;quot;zenloadbalancerv02.tar.gz&amp;quot; there and two iso files. Where is the repository? Regards,  Den</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 06:13:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24405</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>&amp;gt; How do you keep your ldirector config files in sync? Shared filesystem, &amp;gt; svn/cvs, or just rsync/scp? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve got pretty much the same config - A</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 05:26:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24404</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>How do you keep your ldirector config files in sync? Shared filesystem, svn/cvs, or just rsync/scp? I&amp;#039;ve got pretty much the same config - A cloned</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 05:08:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24403</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Hi Ryan, I recommend to piranha users other project: Zen Load Balancer, I &amp;gt; am founder and active developer and I can tell that LVS will be integrat</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 04:45:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24402</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 12:33 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: &amp;gt; this looks like a pretty interesting project but I cannot find any links to &amp;gt; a sou</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 04:04:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24401</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>Hi, this looks like a pretty interesting project but I cannot find any links to a source code repository on the site? How can I get a look at the sou</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 03:33:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24400</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>Excuse me! I forgot attach the project url: www.zenloadbalancer.com Regards! 2012/1/27 Emilio Campos &amp;lt;emilio.campos.martin@gmail.com&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi Ryan, I</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 00:55:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24399</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>Hi Ryan, I recommend to piranha users other project: Zen Load Balancer, I am founder and active developer and I can tell that LVS will be integrated o</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 00:21:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24398</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Cannot figure out failover balancing</title>
<description>On 01/23/2012 03:40 PM, Peter Scott wrote: &amp;gt; Thanks! We&amp;#039;re going to look at Pacemaker (which does seem to be &amp;gt; supported on RHEL6 after all). Looks</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 20:00:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24397</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Cannot figure out failover balancing</title>
<description>Thanks! We&amp;#039;re going to look at Pacemaker (which does seem to be supported on RHEL6 after all). Looks like what we want. On 1/20/2012 5:43 PM, Davi</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 13:40:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24396</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Aleksey Chudov wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Have you thought about the possibility to distribute sync load on &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; multiple</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 12:04:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24395</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Cannot figure out failover balancing</title>
<description>Why not just setup a resource in rgmanager (I&amp;#039;d say use pacemaker, but RedHat doesn&amp;#039;t support that yet), and move the MySQL IP between the hosts, ra</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 17:43:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24394</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Cannot figure out failover balancing</title>
<description>Hello. We are using the Redhat load balancing add-on that comes on RHEL 6. We want to have highly available MySQL; we have two co-master MySQL ser</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 17:13:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24393</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Announcement: Piranha being retired in Fedora 17</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve already posted this to the piranha mailing list, but since there are some piranha users on this mailing list it makes sense to post here as well.</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 09:55:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24392</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Have you thought about the possibility to distribute sync load on &amp;gt;&amp;gt; multiple processors? &amp;gt; May be it is possible to use additional netlin</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 08:07:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24391</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] LVS backup router not taking role</title>
<description>&amp;gt; On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff &amp;lt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; misch@schwartzkopff.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi, all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; first time poster. I rece</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 06:39:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24390</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] LVS backup router not taking role</title>
<description>On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff &amp;lt; misch@schwartzkopff.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi, all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; first time poster. I recently deployed</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 05:29:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24389</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] LVS backup router not taking role</title>
<description>On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 13:16 +0000, Khapare Joshi wrote: &amp;gt; On lvs primary and lvs backup ? but there is Heartbeat interval (seconds): &amp;gt; on piranha inte</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 05:28:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24388</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] LVS backup router not taking role</title>
<description>Thanks,  On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff &amp;lt; misch@schwartzkopff.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi, all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; first time poster. I recentl</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 05:16:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24387</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] LVS backup router not taking role</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Hi, all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; first time poster. I recently deployed lvs (primary and backup) and ran &amp;gt; into few issues. I turned off the primarly lvs to see backup</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 04:26:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24386</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] LVS backup router not taking role</title>
<description>Hi, all, first time poster. I recently deployed lvs (primary and backup) and ran into few issues. I turned off the primarly lvs to see backup lvs wil</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 04:11:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24385</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; redirecting by the director</title>
<description>I gave it a try, using opensuse 12.1 64b, kernel is 3.1.0-1.2. It seems there are slight changes, it is becoming better - a little bit.   -&amp;gt; 192.16</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 07:29:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24384</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 support in IPVS</title>
<description>On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 23:30 +1100, Simon Horman wrote: &amp;gt; But I believe that all the changes are recorded in the git changelog. Indeed they are (at le</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 04:58:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24383</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 support in IPVS</title>
<description>On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 16 Jan 2012, at 23:53, Simon Horman wrote: &amp;gt; is there a more recent document</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 04:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24382</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; redirecting by the director</title>
<description>&amp;gt; I just noted that you&amp;#039;re running OpenSUSE 10.3. That&amp;#039;s very old. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; What kernel are you running? I ask because inactive connections are &amp;gt; included</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 04:13:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24381</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; redirecting by the director</title>
<description>I just noted that you&amp;#039;re running OpenSUSE 10.3. That&amp;#039;s very old. What kernel are you running? I ask because inactive connections are included in the</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 03:00:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24380</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; redirecting by the director</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt; I would try changing the scheduler to either Round Robin (rr) or &amp;gt; Weighted Round Robin (wrr) as you&amp;#039;re being given the default, Weighted &amp;gt; Least</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 02:46:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24379</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; redirecting by the director</title>
<description>On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 11:29 +0100, Peter Stimpel wrote: &amp;gt; There is no NAT involved between Loadbalancer and Clients. Good :) &amp;gt; Yep, this is exactly</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 02:39:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24378</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; redirecting by the director</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Is it possible that all the devices in use for that customer are behind &amp;gt; some form of NAT device, so they all appear to be coming from the same &amp;gt; I</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 02:29:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24377</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; redirecting by the director</title>
<description>On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 10:58 +0100, Peter Stimpel wrote: &amp;gt; I hope it is clear enough where my problem is. The clients are track &amp;amp; &amp;gt; trace units for veh</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 02:13:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24376</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; redirecting by the director</title>
<description>Hi all, I am using ipvs since years, and I am really happy with it - so first of all a big thank you for that stuff! I have a host running ipvs, usi</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 01:58:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24375</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 support in IPVS</title>
<description>On 16 Jan 2012, at 23:53, Simon Horman wrote: is there a more recent document than this Wiki page ... http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/IPv6_load</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 01:39:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24374</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] IPVS changes in 3.0, 3.1 and 3.2</title>
<description>Hi, in an effort to keep more people up to date on recent developments to IPVS I post a report of changes for each kernel release. Sometimes I forget</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 17:08:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24373</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 support in IPVS</title>
<description>On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56:01AM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; is there a more recent document than this Wiki page ... &amp;gt; &amp;gt; http:/</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 15:53:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24372</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; PersistConn: 99.6622% &amp;gt;&amp;gt; ActiveConn: 250.664% &amp;gt;    But this ActiveConn is strange, are some sync messages &amp;gt; dropped/lost here due to hig</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 14:13:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24371</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] IPv6 support in IPVS</title>
<description>Hello, is there a more recent document than this Wiki page ... http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/IPv6_load_balancing ... which documents the IP</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 02:56:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24370</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Aleksey Chudov wrote: &amp;gt; Hello Julian, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I successfully patched Linux Kernel 2.6.39.4 with &amp;quot;port 0&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;HZ/10&amp;quot; and &amp;gt; &amp;quot;sy</description>
<pubDate>15 Jan  2012 08:48:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24369</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello Julian, I rechecked all the figures after a while. Below is average statistics for the peak hour. 1. &amp;quot;port 0&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;HZ/10&amp;quot; patches on Master, &amp;quot;por</description>
<pubDate>13 Jan  2012 03:35:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24368</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] ipvsadm-1.26 Makefile bug on RHEL6</title>
<description>HI, There seems a Makefile bug for RHEL6, I download ipvsadm-1.26.tar.gz&amp;lt;http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/kernel-2.6/ipvsadm-1.26.tar.gz&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>13 Jan  2012 01:22:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24367</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello Julian, I successfully patched Linux Kernel 2.6.39.4 with &amp;quot;port 0&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;HZ/10&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;sync&amp;quot; patched. After reboot and transition Backup server to Ma</description>
<pubDate>12 Jan  2012 08:23:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24366</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] LVS stats for SIP caller ID persistent services</title>
<description>Hi, Any hints to find how to get the number of active sip calls handled by LVS? Thanks Thrivi --- On Mon, 9/1/12, Thrivikram kamath &amp;lt;tvkamath@yahoo</description>
<pubDate>11 Jan  2012 08:06:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24365</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>Hello, On 2012-01-09 14:06, Julian Anastasov wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;    Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Dmitry Akindinov wrote: &amp;gt; [] &amp;gt;&amp;gt; In our case no SYN pack</description>
<pubDate>11 Jan  2012 02:32:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24364</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] KeepAlived + LVS NAT + UDP DNS + Multiple Ext VIPS = All of a sudden, responses go out on wrong VIP</title>
<description>I may have identified a difference between my load balancers, and I&amp;#039;m thinking that this is just happening on one of the load balancers too, as I fa</description>
<pubDate>11 Jan  2012 00:06:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24363</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Aleksey Chudov wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I think we can start tests at this week. Before start testing I have a &amp;gt; couple of q</description>
<pubDate>10 Jan  2012 13:40:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24362</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, I think we can start tests at this week. Before start testing I have a couple of questions: 1. Is new connection sync compatible with the prev</description>
<pubDate>10 Jan  2012 12:20:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24361</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Aleksey Chudov wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Another option is to add time-based alternative. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This is a great idea. Please let me kno</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 16:47:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24360</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] LVS stats for SIP caller ID persistent services</title>
<description>Hello, My question is how to get the stats for number of SIP calls handled by LVS?. I have configured LVS for SIP load balancing with the following</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 07:15:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24359</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] KeepAlived + LVS NAT + UDP DNS + Multiple Ext VIPS = All of a sudden, responses go out on wrong VIP</title>
<description>Hi Guys, I&amp;#039;m sending this to both LVS and Keepalived mailings lists, as both technologies are involved here, and I&amp;#039;m not sure where the failure migh</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 06:53:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24358</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>Hello, On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Dmitry Akindinov wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;   For IPVS tcp_conn_schedule schedules TCP packets only &amp;gt; &amp;gt; when SYN is present, no matter</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 02:06:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24357</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>Hello, On 2012-01-07 02:02, Julian Anastasov wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;    Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Dmitry Akindinov wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;   What about using 10 ma</description>
<pubDate>08 Jan  2012 22:21:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24356</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>Hello, On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Dmitry Akindinov wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;   What about using 10 match rules in mangle/PREROUTING &amp;gt; &amp;gt; to mark every port range. Add 10</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 14:02:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24355</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>That brightened up the morning so much. Thank you sir! -----Original Message----- From: lvs-users-bounces@linuxvirtualserver.org [mailto:lvs-users-bo</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 02:46:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24354</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>Hello, On 2012-01-06 12:23, Julian Anastasov wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;    Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Dmitry Akindinov wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; We have met th</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 02:02:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24353</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 09:46 +0000, Graeme Fowler wrote: &amp;gt; Obviously you wouldn&amp;#039;t do that in the INPUT chain. I haven&amp;#039;t had any &amp;gt; teat this morning :)</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 01:52:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24352</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 09:38 +0000, Graeme Fowler wrote: &amp;gt; Also on the director, have an iptables rule using the multiport module &amp;gt; which matches each</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 01:46:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24351</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>Hi Dmitry Nice to see you pop up here (I was the CGP person at Loughborough Uni). On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 11:15 +0400, Dmitry Akindinov wrote: &amp;gt; Is th</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 01:38:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24350</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>Hello, On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Dmitry Akindinov wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; We have met the following problem with &amp;quot;reverse balancing&amp;quot;. There is a &amp;gt; set of se</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 00:23:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24349</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode</title>
<description>Hello, We have met the following problem with &amp;quot;reverse balancing&amp;quot;. There is a set of servers (let&amp;#039;s say 10), and a load-balancer (for which we would</description>
<pubDate>05 Jan  2012 23:15:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24348</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] (no subject)</title>
<description>Hi,  I have configured the LVS to load balance the SIP service. The users u1 and u3 are registered to serverA via LVS service Vip1, and users u2 and</description>
<pubDate>03 Jan  2012 01:47:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24347</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] (no subject)</title>
<description>Hi, I have configured the LVS to load balance the SIP service. The users u1 and u3 are registered to serverA via LVS service Vip1, and users u2 and u</description>
<pubDate>03 Jan  2012 01:36:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24346</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Hi All need help. LVS_NAT REDHAT</title>
<description>thanks a lot. do you know any lvs tutorial walk-through to get it running as a LVS in Centos or Redhat. and thanks again for your help On Fri, Dec 30</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 06:52:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24345</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] Hi All need help. LVS_NAT REDHAT</title>
<description>On Fri, 30 Dec 2011, Timi koli wrote: &amp;gt; do anyone knows *what are the rpm needed to be installed &amp;gt; on the RHEL5.2* to get LVS_PIRANHA-NAT as per the</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 03:21:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24344</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] Hi All need help. LVS_NAT REDHAT</title>
<description>HI all, I got RHEL 5.2 and want to install a LVS-NAT with two nodes for LVS and 3 nodes for apache in a test LAB.  but i am having trouble *creating</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 01:09:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24343</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] SIP Caller ID persistency</title>
<description>Hi Kumar, its been a while since I have looked at this and most of my notes are on my desk at work :-), but I think you need to enable one packet sche</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 04:16:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24342</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] SIP Caller ID persistency</title>
<description>Hi, I have configured servers 10.11.20.31 and 10.11.20.32 as part of a SIP service 10.11.20.117 in direct server return mode. Here is the output of</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 03:34:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24341</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Aleksey Chudov wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; no matter the sync period. Who has more Active conns? Master or Backup? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Rechecked connect</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 13:20:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24340</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello! &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 2. ip_vs_sync_conn patched, (HZ/10) on both, sync_threshold &amp;quot;3 100&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; on both, &amp;quot;port 0 patch&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Results: sync traffic 60 Mbit/s, 5000 p</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 00:59:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24339</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Aleksey Chudov wrote: &amp;gt; After applying &amp;quot;port 0 patch&amp;quot; ipvsadm displays Active and InAct connection &amp;gt; on Backup node for</description>
<pubDate>27 Dec  2011 17:13:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24338</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Linux Kernel 2.6.39.4 + LVS Fwmark &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -d VIP -i bond0 -p tcp -m multiport &amp;gt;&amp;gt; --dports 80,443 -j MARK</description>
<pubDate>27 Dec  2011 04:27:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24337</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, On Mon, 26 Dec 2011, Aleksey Chudov wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Thanks for the answer. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Is it possible to implement change schedule_timeout_i</description>
<pubDate>26 Dec  2011 14:03:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24336</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, Thanks for the answer. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Is it possible to implement change schedule_timeout_interruptible via sysctl? &amp;gt; May be better to implement logic wi</description>
<pubDate>26 Dec  2011 05:57:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24335</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] ipvs connections sync and CPU usage</title>
<description>Hello, On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Aleksey Chudov wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2009-12/msg00058.html &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have an i</description>
<pubDate>23 Dec  2011 15:42:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/24334</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

