Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 25 Nov 2009 23:27:07 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 05:37:22PM -0800, Robinson, Eric wrote: > > Reading through the documentation for Time::Period again > > I think the best way 25 Nov 2009 16:59:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22728 Hi, I've been building out a platform that uses the net-snmp-lvs module to monitor LVS stats. In testing, it worked just fine. I'm graphing connectio 25 Nov 2009 05:22:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22727 Hi, I recently performed a new setup of LVS using DR for a pair of web servers in streamlined, high-availability/capacity mode. To get around the ARP 24 Nov 2009 06:58:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22726 Hello! In my case bnx2x device driver are compiled into kernel. So I disable LRO with kernel parameter "bnx2x.disable_tpa=1" and after reboot error m 24 Nov 2009 02:57:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22725 Hello, On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Aleksey Chudov wrote: > Hello, > > ip_forward is disabled by default and I doesn't enable it for my DR setup. > > I se 21 Nov 2009 01:42:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22724 Hello, ip_forward is disabled by default and I doesn't enable it for my DR setup. I seems my version of ethtool 6 doesn't know anything about LRO. H 21 Nov 2009 01:12:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22723 Hello, On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Aleksey Chudov wrote: > Hello! > > I have HP ProLiant BL460c G6 servers with Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II > BCM577 20 Nov 2009 16:41:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22722 Aye - the ip address on the realserver is .57 - just a typo on the writeup. >From what I understand there is no arp issue with dual nics and ipvs nat 20 Nov 2009 16:40:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22721 Thank you, Graeme. I'll send this messages to lvs-devel list. Regards, Aleksey -----Original Message----- From: lvs-users-bounces@linuxvirtualserv 20 Nov 2009 16:30:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22720 On 20/11/09 21:58, Jon Gray wrote: > Hey everyone, > > We're currently using nanny/pulse but it seems like nanny generates a > lot of processes and 20 Nov 2009 16:28:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22719 On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 01:13 +0200, Aleksey Chudov wrote: > As problem is only with LVS enabled Kernel I think that it is LVS specific > bug and should 20 Nov 2009 15:49:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22718 Thank you for answer! As far as I understand the bug is with LVS + Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM57711E 10-Gigabit only. May be because of rel 20 Nov 2009 15:13:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22717 "Aleksey Chudov" wrote > I have HP ProLiant BL460c G6 servers with Broadcom > Corporation NetXtreme II BCM57711E 10-Gigabit PCIe > controller. Afte 20 Nov 2009 14:21:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22716 Hey everyone, We're currently using nanny/pulse but it seems like nanny generates a lot of processes and open files and we're concerned about resour 20 Nov 2009 13:58:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22715 Why are you trying to solve the ARP issue in NAT mode? Your real server seems to have the same ip as the DIP ? Or is that just a typo? Real server w 20 Nov 2009 13:06:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22714 Hi Simm, We use LVS in our Ad Serving & analytics platform, serving more than half a billion requests every day. We never had LVS specific issue in 20 Nov 2009 09:56:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22713 Hi! On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Siim Põder wrote: > > surprised to still see it. Hasn't Apache, Linux, and other, almost > > standard open source technolog 20 Nov 2009 09:05:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22712 On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Siim Põder wrote: > Basically, they are saying that everyone else is using > commercial tools and therefore we should, too. th 20 Nov 2009 08:49:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22711 Hi Jay Faulkner wrote: > surprised to still see it. Hasn't Apache, Linux, and other, almost > standard open source technologies killed off that argum 20 Nov 2009 08:37:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22710 > -----Original Message----- > From: lvs-users-bounces@linuxvirtualserver.org [.mailto:lvs-users- > bounces@linuxvirtualserver.org] On Behalf Of Gusta 20 Nov 2009 07:42:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22707 Siim, I use LVS for more than 3 years now, distributing requests to 60 web servers for airline companies B2C and B2B systems. One of my directors is 20 Nov 2009 07:23:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22706 Hi, I'm having an issue currently with a setup - and it's probably something simple that I've missed and not being able to see the wood from the tree 20 Nov 2009 07:00:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22709 Hello! I have HP ProLiant BL460c G6 servers with Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM57711E 10-Gigabit PCIe controller. After enabling Virtual Serve 20 Nov 2009 06:56:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22708 > -----Original Message----- > From: lvs-users-bounces@linuxvirtualserver.org [.mailto:lvs-users- > bounces@linuxvirtualserver.org] On Behalf Of Siim 20 Nov 2009 06:35:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22705 Siim Põder wrote: > Hi > > I have a bit of a religious question: is LVS good enough to use in > "critical environments" (however you would feel like 20 Nov 2009 06:03:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22704 2009/11/20 Siim Põder <siim@p6drad-teel.net> > Hi > > I have a bit of a religious question: is LVS good enough to use in...... > Siim, Here at Loa 20 Nov 2009 05:55:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22703 Hi I have a bit of a religious question: is LVS good enough to use in "critical environments" (however you would feel like defining it)? We are curre 20 Nov 2009 05:41:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22702 On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 13:34, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@wm7d.net> wrote: > -dh maps on urls, not IPs (it was developed for squids). > > The urls are di 17 Nov 2009 14:37:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22701 On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Josh Adams wrote: > If I have say, (N+2)=K realservers, how would > the DH scheduler map N over K? -dh maps on urls, not IPs (i 17 Nov 2009 13:34:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22700 Hi, Been using this setup on at least 4 different installations without this issue... we have multiple virtual services and use iptables MARK to tag 17 Nov 2009 10:33:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22699 Hi Joe, thanks for the quick response! I initially thought scheduling based on a hash of the destination IP wouldn't do it for me but now I'm startin 17 Nov 2009 09:08:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22698 On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >> is the director the only route for packets from the >> internet realserver to the clients? if you 17 Nov 2009 06:31:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22697 Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > >> I tried to set this up with LVS/NAT, but only could connect to the real 17 Nov 2009 06:00:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22696 On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Josh Adams wrote: > Ideally I could somehow get LVS to schedule requests by > running consistent hashing against the request UR 17 Nov 2009 05:55:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22695 On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > I tried to set this up with LVS/NAT, but only could connect to the real > server which is in the sam 17 Nov 2009 05:53:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22694 Hi lvs-users, Please pardon the inconvenience if I've missed an obvious thread in the archives or piece of documentation but I can't seem to find any 16 Nov 2009 19:50:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22693 Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > Is the following setup possible with LVS: > > > real server (same LAN) > 16 Nov 2009 16:02:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22692 Is the following setup possible with LVS: real server (same LAN) / user -- i 16 Nov 2009 14:48:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22691 > Reading through the documentation for Time::Period again > I think the best way to cover the 24 hour period is > probably to just use hr {0-23} T 11 Nov 2009 17:37:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22690 ok. Reading through the documentation for Time::Period again, I think the best way to cover the 24 hour period is probably to just use hr {0-23} whic 11 Nov 2009 07:43:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22689 > Also, what are the thoughts of having the configuration option > be exclusive instead Inclusive or exclusive works equally well for me. It'll be a 11 Nov 2009 07:11:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22688 I guess I should probably set the default time period for 24 hours and not just 12 hours. I think that would be something like hr {12am-11am}. Looki 10 Nov 2009 23:48:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22687 i just realized a mistake in my previous email the default emailalertperiod is actually set for wd {Mon-Sun} hr {12am-12pm} and not wd {Mon-Fri} hr 10 Nov 2009 23:37:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22686 I wrote a small patch against the latest (as of yesterday) unreleased tree in the mercurial repository. It requires another CPAN dependency. The Tim 10 Nov 2009 22:46:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22685 Also, the digest idea is still somewhat problematic because the max length of an SMS message is too short, so 300 cell-phone texts might get trimmed d 09 Nov 2009 15:24:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22684 Hi Anthony, > i am not sure if eric is using for example a single config > file/ldirectord process with 300 services in it, or 300 > config files/l 09 Nov 2009 15:12:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22683 Hi Partica, Sorry, I haven't read all your mail, but I think it's may helpful to you: http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/mini-HOWTO/LVS-mini-HOWTO 08 Nov 2009 21:03:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22682 On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Simon Horman wrote: > I also wonder if a different approach could work. Assuming that > the connection from the real-server doesn 08 Nov 2009 16:54:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22681 Simon Horman wrote: >> 3. if using multiple configuration files/ldirectord processes, you would >> then probably need to have something like a control 06 Nov 2009 17:57:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22680 On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 04:33:38PM -0500, anthony@duck.com wrote: > Since I was the person that contributed the patch for the email alert code back in 06 Nov 2009 17:05:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22679 Since I was the person that contributed the patch for the email alert code back in 2006, I could make another contribution attempt without making thin 06 Nov 2009 13:33:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22678 Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:22:54PM +0300, calculator@land.ru wrote: > >> Strange, can not see previous my answer. Try again. 06 Nov 2009 05:59:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22677 Yes, right now it is on. But I have tested both states on/off. As I wrote in my last post - as far as I understand http://tldp.org/LDP/Linux-Filesyste 06 Nov 2009 02:55:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22676 Hi Ondrej.Rajmon@cuzk.cz wrote: > When RS1 connects to itself thru VIP, TCP connection is not > established. Using tcpdump I can see that the SYN pac 06 Nov 2009 02:37:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22675 Hi, thanks for hint. I did some experiments with: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/bond0/rp_filter /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/bond0/accept_source_route /p 06 Nov 2009 02:27:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22674 On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 05:27:00PM +0100, Ondrej.Rajmon@cuzk.cz wrote: > Hello, > maybe my question is generally about a Linux network subsystem but 05 Nov 2009 16:19:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22672 On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:10:13PM +0100, Malte Geierhos wrote: > Hi, > > Don't you think this is more or less the meaning of having a "bigger" > mo 05 Nov 2009 16:05:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22671 On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:22:54PM +0300, calculator@land.ru wrote: > Strange, can not see previous my answer. Try again. > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 05 Nov 2009 16:00:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22673 Strange, can not see previous my answer. Try again. > On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:54:07AM +0300, calculator@land.ru wrote: > > > > Graeme Fowler: > > > 05 Nov 2009 12:22:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22670 Hello, maybe my question is generally about a Linux network subsystem but nevertheless, it is related to LVS. My systems are RHEL5 and I have configu 05 Nov 2009 08:27:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22669 > Disregarding for a moment the time-based stuff (and > exceptions to that), what you're asking for is an > implementation of "flap detection" I s 05 Nov 2009 07:36:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22668 Hi, > To me it seems like apple and oranges. ldirectord manages lvs and runs > right on the load balancers. It is fast, relaible, and easy for me to > 05 Nov 2009 05:53:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22667 On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 04:43 -0800, Robinson, Eric wrote: > I'm a fan of ldirectord so I am proposing a possible feature. ldirectord > sends me an emai 05 Nov 2009 05:52:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22666 > Don't you think this is more or less the meaning of having a "bigger" > monitoring infrastructure like Nagios - to handle such things ? To me it s 05 Nov 2009 05:42:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22665 Hi, Don't you think this is more or less the meaning of having a "bigger" monitoring infrastructur like Nagios - to handle such things ? For me it s 05 Nov 2009 05:10:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22664 I'm a fan of ldirectord so I am proposing a possible feature. ldirectord sends me an email alert when services go down, which sometimes works too well 05 Nov 2009 04:43:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22663 On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:54:07AM +0300, calculator@land.ru wrote: > > Graeme Fowler: > > Hi there > > > > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 11:10 +0300, calcul 03 Nov 2009 21:42:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22662 Graeme Fowler: > Hi there > > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 11:10 +0300, calculator@land.ru wrote: > >> Similar problem post on >> http://lists.graemef.ne 03 Nov 2009 00:54:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22661 Thanks again, Graeme. I changed the port to 3128. Still no dice. :| I just posted a message about this to the Piranha list to see what those cats 02 Nov 2009 16:44:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22660 On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 13:19 -0800, mojorising wrote: > Okay. I've finally had time to come back to this. I've looked over > your latest message and no 02 Nov 2009 13:35:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22659 Okay. I've finally had time to come back to this. I've looked over your latest message and now think I'm kinda stuck. I checked /var/log/messages and 02 Nov 2009 13:19:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22658 Hi there On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 11:10 +0300, calculator@land.ru wrote: > Similar problem post on > http://lists.graemef.net/pipermail/lvs-users/2005- 02 Nov 2009 09:02:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22657 Hello. Similar problem post on http://lists.graemef.net/pipermail/lvs-users/2005-May/013820.html I use ipvsadm-1.24-8.1 with heartbeat-ldirectord-2.1 01 Nov 2009 01:10:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22656 On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:24:58PM -0200, Raul da Silva {Sp4wn} wrote: > I heard the following about flow of "master/bakcup" sync (piranha + dr ): > 30 Oct 2009 18:25:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22655 On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, partysoft wrote: > > Isn't the NAT method lame, not according to the HOWTO Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Ca 29 Oct 2009 18:29:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22654 Isn't the NAT method lame, like it doesn't support as many connections ? anyway i've moved the external ip to the LAN , in the same C class , and now 29 Oct 2009 16:39:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22653 On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 21:01 -0600, Partica Cristian wrote: > so it isn't because of the arp and the router ? i thought that it had > something to do w 29 Oct 2009 02:15:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22652 On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 09:13 -0700, partysoft wrote: > [root@linux 10.1.228.234]# arping 10.1.228.235 < from the director > ARPING 10.1.228.235 from 29 Oct 2009 02:13:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22651 Hello Léon, i will post another wierd thing that's happening with the LVS, you seem to know it all :) Now i got it working with 1 LVS as server and 28 Oct 2009 21:36:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22650 so it isn't because of the arp and the router ? i thought that it had something to do with it, but of course the TUN is supposed to work regardless of 28 Oct 2009 20:01:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22649 Please take a look at the bottom of the howto where there's explained howto set tcp-mss size ;) > Just a quick update > > when i try to load in the s 28 Oct 2009 19:08:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22648 Just a quick update when i try to load in the server browser the.. http://10.1.228.234 it doesn't give a timeout...right away it stays there for like 28 Oct 2009 15:14:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22647 Hy All! i'm trying to setup an LVS system for http with 3 servers 1 being the director..(i have a previous post for this that went sucessfull) the sub 28 Oct 2009 09:13:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22646 A/C> I made this tests before, but don't have a effect, but tks for your opinion. Tks, On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:51 PM, L.S. Keijser <leon@linux.n 27 Oct 2009 13:56:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22645 On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 13:24 -0200, Raul da Silva {Sp4wn} wrote: > I heard the following about flow of "master/bakcup" sync (piranha + dr ): > > Once 27 Oct 2009 12:51:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22644 I heard the following about flow of "master/bakcup" sync (piranha + dr ): Once a connection is established, the master sync daemon (on the active dir 27 Oct 2009 08:24:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22643 Other thing : There is a problem in a config default on file "lvs.cfg" the parameter default in "keepalive" is *MINOR* than "deadline" , but this sho 27 Oct 2009 06:48:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22642 The configuration is ok and mcast communication is ok too, The problem is that sync table happens when master server receives a heavy requests and tra 27 Oct 2009 06:46:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22641 On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:58 -0200, Raul da Silva {Sp4wn} wrote: > Hi , everyone, > > I'd like to know why sync table connections doesn't happens betw 26 Oct 2009 21:41:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22640 Hi , everyone, I'd like to know why sync table connections doesn't happens between master/backup and backup/master server ? When I check the table in 26 Oct 2009 13:58:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22639 On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:18 -0700, mojorising wrote: > Thanks a lot for your response. It helps me understand a bit more > about how LVS works. Grand 26 Oct 2009 12:09:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22638 Graeme, Thanks a lot for your response. It helps me understand a bit more about how LVS works. So, as I mentioned in my first post, "The web servers 26 Oct 2009 11:18:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22637 Hi On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 15:25 -0700, mojorising wrote: > When I try to access the web servers from my desktop via the load > balancer virtual IP, th 24 Oct 2009 03:42:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22636 Hello! I am having some trouble with a test set up of LVS. I am trying to balance traffic between two web servers listening on port 80. The web serv 23 Oct 2009 15:25:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22635 Yes, well, for the LVS-TUN, seems that almost noone has recomended or tried that way, but i've heard it's slow, well not as slow as the NAT method tha 23 Oct 2009 10:21:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22634 On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 21:40 -0700, partysoft wrote: > oh the Kerner version is : > Linux linux.local 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:28:30 EDT 200 23 Oct 2009 04:44:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22633 Eurika, you have enlightend me so now all works, i am able to get to the realserver through the Virtual IP configured on the director that i've setup 22 Oct 2009 21:40:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22632 Wow, i'm going to try all this and tell you tomorrow how did it go. You're a genious by the way Thank you a lot L.S. Keijser-2 wrote: > > Hi, > > 22 Oct 2009 15:21:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22631 Hi, I'm replying to you and to the lvs-users list so everyone can participate and help. It's a fairly long reply with detailed instructions on how to 22 Oct 2009 14:22:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22626 Wha't i'm trying to do is setup a load banancer using 3 servers for a webservice (HTTP) 1st - the main server which will redirect to the 2nd or 3rd s 22 Oct 2009 12:50:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22630