<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Linux Virtual Server | Users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>25 Nov  2009 22:35:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] emailalertperiod configuration option</title>
<description>On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 05:37:22PM -0800, Robinson, Eric wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Reading through the documentation for Time::Period again &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I think the best way</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 16:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22728</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] net-snmp-lvs-module: stats fail under high load</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve been building out a platform that uses the net-snmp-lvs module to monitor LVS stats. In testing, it worked just fine. I&amp;#039;m graphing connectio</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 05:22:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22727</link>
</item><item>
<title>[lvs-users] LVS-DR in HA mode, VIP not being assigned to eth0:0 on boot</title>
<description>Hi, I recently performed a new setup of LVS using DR for a pair of web servers in streamlined, high-availability/capacity mode. To get around the ARP</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 06:58:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22726</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] LVS and Broadcom bug</title>
<description>Hello! In my case bnx2x device driver are compiled into kernel. So I disable LRO with kernel parameter &amp;quot;bnx2x.disable_tpa=1&amp;quot; and after reboot error m</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 02:57:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22725</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] LVS and Broadcom bug</title>
<description>Hello, On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Aleksey Chudov wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; ip_forward is disabled by default and I doesn&amp;#039;t enable it for my DR setup. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I se</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 01:42:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22724</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] LVS and Broadcom bug</title>
<description>Hello, ip_forward is disabled by default and I doesn&amp;#039;t enable it for my DR setup. I seems my version of ethtool 6 doesn&amp;#039;t know anything about LRO. H</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 01:12:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22723</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] LVS and Broadcom bug</title>
<description>Hello, On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Aleksey Chudov wrote: &amp;gt; Hello! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have HP ProLiant BL460c G6 servers with Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II &amp;gt; BCM577</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 16:41:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22722</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] IPVS - Nat Issue</title>
<description>Aye - the ip address on the realserver is .57 - just a typo on the writeup. &amp;gt;From what I understand there is no arp issue with dual nics and ipvs nat</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 16:40:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22721</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] LVS and Broadcom bug</title>
<description>Thank you, Graeme. I&amp;#039;ll send this messages to lvs-devel list. Regards, Aleksey  -----Original Message----- From: lvs-users-bounces@linuxvirtualserv</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 16:30:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22720</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [lvs-users] (no subject)</title>
<description>On 20/11/09 21:58, Jon Gray wrote: &amp;gt; Hey everyone, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; We&amp;#039;re currently using nanny/pulse but it seems like nanny generates a &amp;gt; lot of processes and</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 16:28:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lvs/users/22719</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
