otis_gospodnetic at yahoo
Aug 19, 2008, 1:11 PM
Post #2 of 2
(2772 views)
Permalink
|
I like this idea. Perhaps separate the solr version and the solr-ruby version with a dash instead of dot -- solr-ruby-1.3.0-0.0.6
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
----- Original Message ----
> From: Koji Sekiguchi <koji [at] r>
> To: solr-user [at] lucene; ruby-dev [at] lucene
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:24:31 AM
> Subject: solr-ruby version management
>
> From: http://www.nabble.com/CHANGES.txt-td18901774.html
>
> The latest version of solr-ruby is 0.0.6:
>
> solr-ruby-0.0.6.gem
> http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=2875&release_id=23885
>
> I think it isn't clear what Solr version is corresponding.
>
> I'd like to change this to solr-ruby-{solrVersion}.{solr-rubyVersion}.gem
> when Solr 1.3 is released. Where solr-rubyVersion is two digits.
> That is, the first official release of solr-ruby will be
> solr-ruby-1.3.0.01.gem.
>
> Any objections to changing to this new version format?
> Or anyone who has suggestions, please let me know.
>
> Koji
|
