erik at ehatchersolutions
May 30, 2005, 5:40 PM
Post #1 of 1
(2340 views)
Permalink
|
|
Fwd: [Rails] Ruby/Odeum vs. Lucene: Part 2
|
|
FYI...
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Zed A. Shaw" <zedshaw [at] zedshaw>
> Date: May 30, 2005 9:34:09 PM EDT
> To: Ruby On Rails List <rails [at] lists>
> Subject: [Rails] Ruby/Odeum vs. Lucene: Part 2
> Reply-To: zedshaw [at] zedshaw, rails [at] lists
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Just wanted to send out an update on my recent Ruby/Odeum vs. Lucene
> performance analysis.
>
> http://www.zedshaw.com/projects/ruby_odeum/odeum_lucene_part2.html
>
> This analysis is much more detailed, covers a consistent analysis
> method, and is probably really really boring for most people. Lots of
> pretty graphs and tables of data. There is an Executive Summary for
> people who are not interested in the full details. The gist of the
> analysis is that Ruby/Odeum is slower than Lucene, but uses a lot less
> memory.
>
> I'm interested in grammar corrections, questions about terminology,
> and
> other comments. Please send me your comments rather than the list
> as I
> think most people would consider grammar corrections off-topic. I'll
> give everyone who comments credit on the essay (with links to your
> blog
> or site).
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> Zed A. Shaw
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails [at] lists
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
|
