<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lucene | Java-User</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>08 Nov  2009 04:14:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>lucene 2.9+ numeric indexing</title>
<description>Hi guys:   Running into a strange problem:   I am indexing into a field a numeric string:   int n = Math.abs(rand.nextInt(1000000));  Field</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 00:36:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88170</link>
</item><item>
<title>Indexing domain names?</title>
<description>Hi, How do I go about indexing domain names? I currently index the domain, but it only works if I put the exact full domain in. For example: site:ww</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 22:20:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88168</link>
</item><item>
<title>Apache Lucene java 2.9.1 released</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release 2.9.1 of Apache Lucene java is now available. This release fixes bugs from 2.9.0, including on</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 07:19:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88145</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: addIndexesNoOptimize on shards --&amp;gt; is docid deterministic and calculable?</title>
<description>Currently the docIDs are in fact logically appended, during IndexWriter.addIndexes*. This really is an implementation detail, though, so conceivably</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 06:35:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88144</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>Hmm... for step 4 you should have gotten &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; back from isCurrent. You&amp;#039;re sure there were no intervening calls to IndexWriter.commit? Are you using</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 01:17:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88131</link>
</item><item>
<title>No sir may b somewhere am wrong in the internet options</title>
<description>No sir but its getting downloaded in the prescribed format. I have attached a screenshot. --- On Fri, 6/11/09, Anshum &amp;lt;anshumg@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote:  Fr</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 20:55:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88126</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s a new scenario: 1. JVM 1 creates IndexWriter, version 1 2. JVM 2 creates IndexReader, version 1 3. JVM 1 IndexWriter calls prepareCommit() 4.</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 11:46:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88108</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IndexingChain and TermHash</title>
<description>Hi Michael, Thanks for the quick fix. I have tested it (indexing multiple documents + searching), and it seems to work. On 06/11/09 18:09, Michael</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 10:34:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88107</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IndexingChain and TermHash</title>
<description>To be honest, you are sort of forging new territory here :) The intention of TermsHash was to allow a null nextTermsHash. Hopefully fixing a few plac</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 10:09:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88085</link>
</item><item>
<title>IndexingChain and TermHash</title>
<description>Hi, I am trying to modify the indexing chain of Lucene. To start, I have extracted and modified the default indexing chain. I have just removed the</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 09:29:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88084</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>It will always return a reader reflecting every change done with that writer (plus, the index as it was when the writer was opened) before getReader w</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:40:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88083</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>Which version of the index will IndexWriter.getReader() return if there have been updates, but no call to &amp;#039;prepareCommit&amp;#039;?  On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:35:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88082</link>
</item><item>
<title>IndexWriter RAMBufferSizeMB memory leak?</title>
<description>If I use an IndexWriter and set the RAMBufferSizeMB to 16(default) or lower the memory is freed as expected and the memory of the process will level o</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:33:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88080</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Peter Keegan &amp;lt;peterlkeegan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;Can you use IndexWriter.getReader() to get the reader for step 2 &amp;gt; Yes</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:33:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88081</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>&amp;gt;Can you use IndexWriter.getReader() to get the reader for step 2 Yes - perfect! I didn&amp;#039;t think that would be different than refreshing or recreating</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:22:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88079</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>Can you use IndexWriter.getReader() to get the reader for step 2? Failing that, you could simply commit the change, but use a deletion policy that ke</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:02:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88069</link>
</item><item>
<title>2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m trying to use a two phase commit involving a Lucene index and an external file derived from the index. Here are the steps: 1. prepare commit on L</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 07:59:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88068</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Link in the result page is not opening</title>
<description>Hi Dhivya, I&amp;#039;m not too clear on your problem here. Looks to me like a regular application logic issue rather than lucene or search. Tryin to solve the</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 04:31:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88066</link>
</item><item>
<title>PhraseQuery Problem</title>
<description>Hi All, One of things that we want to do in our application is to assign the score to a doc which is something like this score = (# terms matched to</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 03:37:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88065</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Loading less terms in memory</title>
<description>2.9 has fixed this bug (IndexReader.reopen failing to carry over the index divisor to newly opened segments). One workaround is to simply use reopen(</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 01:36:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88064</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Directory.list() deprecation</title>
<description>Well... you can use oal.index.IndexFileNameFilter.getFilter() to filter for only the Lucene index files, or, you could filter for the additional files</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 01:26:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88063</link>
</item><item>
<title>Link in the result page is not opening</title>
<description>Hi all,   Am using Java Lucene through web.   When i execute through Netbeans, its working well. My problem is:   It is displaying the list of links t</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 01:10:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88062</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: is it possible to make lucene searches match based on per doc field:termcount?</title>
<description>looks like it, thanks! but if I index multiple copies of the same value, ie: myfield:a,a,b and search with myfield:(a or b) or perhaps myfield:(a or a</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 00:50:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88057</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: UpdateDocument failed</title>
<description>Thanks Ian. There are some issues with my code.  I am using almost 40 fields only two fields, requires update one will be updated by background threa</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 00:42:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88056</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Creating tag clouds with lucene</title>
<description>On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Mathias Bank &amp;lt;mathias.bank@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; Well, it could be a facet search, if there would be tags available but</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 00:39:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88055</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
