<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lucene | Java-User</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>08 Nov  2009 16:05:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Directory.list() deprecation</title>
<description>On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 20:26, Michael McCandless &amp;lt;lucene@mikemccandless.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Well... you can use oal.index.IndexFileNameFilter.getFilter() to</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 13:58:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88210</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Indexing domain names?</title>
<description>&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;I am using the StandardAnalyzer as most of the other fields being indexed are free form text. &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; If you try Ahmet&amp;#039;s suggestion, PerFieldAnalyzerW</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 06:43:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88196</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: lucene 2.9+ numeric indexing</title>
<description>That&amp;#039;s indeed strange. The problem has nothing to do with NumericField/NumericUtils and corresponding FieldCache parsing at all, it is more the autode</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 06:30:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88195</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: synonym payload boosting</title>
<description>Additionaly you need to modify your queryparser to return BoostingTermQuery, PayloadTermQuery, PayloadNearQuery etc. With these types of Queries scor</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 05:52:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88187</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: synonym payload boosting</title>
<description>You might get an answer on the solr list. This is the lucene users list. Simon On Nov 8, 2009 2:24 PM, &amp;quot;David Ginzburg&amp;quot; &amp;lt;davidginzburg@gmail.com&amp;gt; wr</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 05:46:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88186</link>
</item><item>
<title>synonym payload boosting</title>
<description>Hi, I have a field and a wighted synonym map. I have indexed the synonyms with the weight as payload. my code snippet from my filter *public Token ne</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 05:23:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88185</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Indexing domain names?</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; How do I go about indexing domain names? I currently index &amp;gt; the domain, but &amp;gt; it only works if I put the exact full domain in. For &amp;gt; examp</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 02:54:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88177</link>
</item><item>
<title>lucene 2.9+ numeric indexing</title>
<description>Hi guys:   Running into a strange problem:   I am indexing into a field a numeric string:   int n = Math.abs(rand.nextInt(1000000));  Field</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 00:36:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88170</link>
</item><item>
<title>Indexing domain names?</title>
<description>Hi, How do I go about indexing domain names? I currently index the domain, but it only works if I put the exact full domain in. For example: site:ww</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 22:20:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88168</link>
</item><item>
<title>Apache Lucene java 2.9.1 released</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release 2.9.1 of Apache Lucene java is now available. This release fixes bugs from 2.9.0, including on</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 07:19:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88145</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: addIndexesNoOptimize on shards --&amp;gt; is docid deterministic and calculable?</title>
<description>Currently the docIDs are in fact logically appended, during IndexWriter.addIndexes*. This really is an implementation detail, though, so conceivably</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 06:35:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88144</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>Hmm... for step 4 you should have gotten &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; back from isCurrent. You&amp;#039;re sure there were no intervening calls to IndexWriter.commit? Are you using</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 01:17:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88131</link>
</item><item>
<title>No sir may b somewhere am wrong in the internet options</title>
<description>No sir but its getting downloaded in the prescribed format. I have attached a screenshot. --- On Fri, 6/11/09, Anshum &amp;lt;anshumg@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote:  Fr</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 20:55:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88126</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s a new scenario: 1. JVM 1 creates IndexWriter, version 1 2. JVM 2 creates IndexReader, version 1 3. JVM 1 IndexWriter calls prepareCommit() 4.</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 11:46:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88108</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IndexingChain and TermHash</title>
<description>Hi Michael, Thanks for the quick fix. I have tested it (indexing multiple documents + searching), and it seems to work. On 06/11/09 18:09, Michael</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 10:34:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88107</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IndexingChain and TermHash</title>
<description>To be honest, you are sort of forging new territory here :) The intention of TermsHash was to allow a null nextTermsHash. Hopefully fixing a few plac</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 10:09:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88085</link>
</item><item>
<title>IndexingChain and TermHash</title>
<description>Hi, I am trying to modify the indexing chain of Lucene. To start, I have extracted and modified the default indexing chain. I have just removed the</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 09:29:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88084</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>It will always return a reader reflecting every change done with that writer (plus, the index as it was when the writer was opened) before getReader w</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:40:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88083</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>Which version of the index will IndexWriter.getReader() return if there have been updates, but no call to &amp;#039;prepareCommit&amp;#039;?  On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:35:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88082</link>
</item><item>
<title>IndexWriter RAMBufferSizeMB memory leak?</title>
<description>If I use an IndexWriter and set the RAMBufferSizeMB to 16(default) or lower the memory is freed as expected and the memory of the process will level o</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:33:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88080</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Peter Keegan &amp;lt;peterlkeegan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;Can you use IndexWriter.getReader() to get the reader for step 2 &amp;gt; Yes</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:33:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88081</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>&amp;gt;Can you use IndexWriter.getReader() to get the reader for step 2 Yes - perfect! I didn&amp;#039;t think that would be different than refreshing or recreating</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:22:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88079</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>Can you use IndexWriter.getReader() to get the reader for step 2? Failing that, you could simply commit the change, but use a deletion policy that ke</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:02:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88069</link>
</item><item>
<title>2 phase commit with external data</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m trying to use a two phase commit involving a Lucene index and an external file derived from the index. Here are the steps: 1. prepare commit on L</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 07:59:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88068</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Link in the result page is not opening</title>
<description>Hi Dhivya, I&amp;#039;m not too clear on your problem here. Looks to me like a regular application logic issue rather than lucene or search. Tryin to solve the</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 04:31:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88066</link>
</item><item>
<title>PhraseQuery Problem</title>
<description>Hi All, One of things that we want to do in our application is to assign the score to a doc which is something like this score = (# terms matched to</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 03:37:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88065</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Loading less terms in memory</title>
<description>2.9 has fixed this bug (IndexReader.reopen failing to carry over the index divisor to newly opened segments). One workaround is to simply use reopen(</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 01:36:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88064</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Directory.list() deprecation</title>
<description>Well... you can use oal.index.IndexFileNameFilter.getFilter() to filter for only the Lucene index files, or, you could filter for the additional files</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 01:26:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88063</link>
</item><item>
<title>Link in the result page is not opening</title>
<description>Hi all,   Am using Java Lucene through web.   When i execute through Netbeans, its working well. My problem is:   It is displaying the list of links t</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 01:10:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88062</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: is it possible to make lucene searches match based on per doc field:termcount?</title>
<description>looks like it, thanks! but if I index multiple copies of the same value, ie: myfield:a,a,b and search with myfield:(a or b) or perhaps myfield:(a or a</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 00:50:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88057</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: UpdateDocument failed</title>
<description>Thanks Ian. There are some issues with my code.  I am using almost 40 fields only two fields, requires update one will be updated by background threa</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 00:42:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88056</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Creating tag clouds with lucene</title>
<description>On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Mathias Bank &amp;lt;mathias.bank@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; Well, it could be a facet search, if there would be tags available but</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 00:39:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88055</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Creating tag clouds with lucene</title>
<description>Well, it could be a facet search, if there would be tags available but if you just wanna have a &amp;quot;tag cloud&amp;quot; generated by full-text, I don&amp;#039;t see how a</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 00:25:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88054</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Index files not deleted after optimization</title>
<description>Thanks Michael. Below order helped to solve the issue, 1. DB optimize 2. DB commit 3. Reopen new reader 4. Close old reader 5. Close writer 6. Open</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 23:22:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88053</link>
</item><item>
<title>Directory.list() deprecation</title>
<description>Hi all. I am trying to clean up some deprecated calls which are showing up on upgrading to 2.9.0 (from 2.3.2...), and I have just come across Directo</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 21:39:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88052</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Creating tag clouds with lucene</title>
<description>Interesting idea! Kind of &amp;quot;cheating&amp;quot; because the word frequency in the whole index is simply mapped to the search results, which is arguable. But ma</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 19:44:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88048</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Creating tag clouds with lucene</title>
<description>Well you can do it as a facet search, but in addition to doing multi-valued faceting, you can also normalize the counts by dividing by the docFreq of</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 19:15:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88047</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Creating tag clouds with lucene</title>
<description>Isn&amp;#039;t the tag cloud just another facet search? Only difference is the tag is multi-valued. Basically just go through the search results and find all</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 19:01:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88046</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: is it possible to make lucene searches match based on per doc field:termcount?</title>
<description>On Nov 5, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Jason Eacott wrote: &amp;gt; Hi All, I hope someone can offer some advice. &amp;gt; I want to extend lucene to search in a particular w</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 17:11:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88044</link>
</item><item>
<title>is it possible to make lucene searches match based on per doc field:termcount?</title>
<description>Hi All, I hope someone can offer some advice. I want to extend lucene to search in a particular way(if it cant already): I want to index docs, each w</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 16:31:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88043</link>
</item><item>
<title>Open source search social evening in London - 18th Nov</title>
<description>Hi all, (Apologies for the cross-post) It&amp;#039;s been a while since the last time we met up, so we&amp;#039;re organising another open source search social evenin</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 13:57:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88020</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: one to many relationship</title>
<description>Shahid, As Ian described, for one-to-many relationships, you need to flatten the relationship and store it into Documents. It&amp;#039;s not efficient to sea</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 10:19:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88005</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Facets</title>
<description>Can you describe your lucene index a little further? How many documents are in it, and what do you mean by &amp;quot;listing all the indexes in this applicati</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 09:49:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/88004</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Creating tag clouds with lucene</title>
<description>Mathias, This is a special case: I am doing this on fields that have single term entries, or are treated like a single term (like &amp;#039;author&amp;#039;) and not p</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 08:03:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87993</link>
</item><item>
<title>Sv: Re: Facets</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Toke Eskildsen 09-11-03 14:43 &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 10:23 +0100, Henrik Hjalmarsson wrote: &amp;gt; I have gotten a demand for an API method that re</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 08:03:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87994</link>
</item><item>
<title>Sv: Re: Facets</title>
<description>So basicly there is no effective way of doing this? The only solution I&amp;#039;ve come up with is Pseudo code: for( every index ) {   create term(index,</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 07:37:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87992</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Creating tag clouds with lucene</title>
<description>Hi Glen, great, that is exactly what I&amp;#039;m looking for. How are you doing this? Mathias 2009/11/5 Glen Newton &amp;lt;glen.newton@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Yes. I do it</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 07:35:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87991</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Creating tag clouds with lucene</title>
<description>Yes. I do it here in Ungava, on a search of &amp;quot;cancer&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; in title: http://lab.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ungava01/Search?tagCloud=true&amp;amp;collect</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 07:27:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87990</link>
</item><item>
<title>Creating tag clouds with lucene</title>
<description>Hi, I want to calculate a tag cload for search results. I have seen, that it is possible to extract the top 20 words out of the lucene index. Is ther</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 07:21:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87989</link>
</item><item>
<title>Loading less terms in memory</title>
<description>Hello all, Due to some constraint in memory, I want to load less terms in memory. In case of Lucene 2.4.1, IndexDivisor is not working when we do reo</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 02:46:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87982</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Design doubt</title>
<description>On Nov 5, 2009, at 7:18 AM, prabin meitei wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; how can a design an index in such a way that &amp;gt; - i can search who purchased a book say b1, sort</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 22:32:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87980</link>
</item><item>
<title>Design doubt</title>
<description>Hi,   I have a scenario as described below user U1 - books purchased ,b1, b5, ... so on user U2 - books purchased ,b2, b7, ... so on ... ... ... Un</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 22:18:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87975</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: lucene-contrib maven artifact</title>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t use maven, but ... : When I add this dependency to my pom.xml, an error occurs. org.apache.lucene:lucene-contrib:jar:2.9.0 is missing.</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 10:30:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87949</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: addIndexesNoOptimize on shards --&amp;gt; is docid deterministic and calculable?</title>
<description>Yeah I understand. Thanks anyway, it cleared my head a bit,  Geert-Jan  Erick Erickson wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; You&amp;#039;re right, my comment was irrelevant. Mostly,</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 09:29:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87941</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: addIndexesNoOptimize on shards --&amp;gt; is docid deterministic and calculable?</title>
<description>You&amp;#039;re right, my comment was irrelevant. Mostly, I try to make sure that people aren&amp;#039;t asking an &amp;quot;XY problem&amp;quot;, That is, asking for how to do X when wh</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 08:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87940</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: addIndexesNoOptimize on shards --&amp;gt; is docid deterministic and calculable?</title>
<description>please ignore the garbage at the end ;-)  Britske wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This issue is related to post: &amp;quot;merging Parallel indexes (can &amp;gt; indexWriter.addIndexes</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 08:08:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87930</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: addIndexesNoOptimize on shards --&amp;gt; is docid deterministic and calculable?</title>
<description>This issue is related to post: &amp;quot;merging Parallel indexes (can indexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize be used?)&amp;quot; Among another thing described in the post a</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 08:06:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87929</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: void touchFile() should return the boolean result of the setLastModified</title>
<description>We discussed about this method yesterday in the evening. The abstract base class defines the method as throwing an IOException. So the correct behavio</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 07:52:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87928</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: addIndexesNoOptimize on shards --&amp;gt; is docid deterministic and calculable?</title>
<description>Hmmmm, why do you care? That is, what is it you&amp;#039;re trying to do that makes this question necessary? There might be a better solution than trying to de</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 07:10:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87927</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: addIndexesNoOptimize on shards --&amp;gt; is docid deterministic and calculable? (IF docids of shards seperately are known)</title>
<description>Just to clarify question changed the subject: addIndexesNoOptimize on shards --&amp;gt; is docid deterministic and calculable? (IF docids of shards seperate</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 06:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87926</link>
</item><item>
<title>addIndexesNoOptimize on shards --&amp;gt; is docid deterministic and calculable?</title>
<description>Hi,  say I have: - Indexreader[] readers = {reader1, reader2, reader3} //containing all different docs - I know the internal docids of documents in</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 06:23:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87925</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: merging Parallel indexes (can indexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize be used?)</title>
<description>Yeah excellent! This should indeed work! Thanks, Geert-Jan  JÃ©rÃ´me ThiÃ¨vre wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hello Geert-Jan, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; it&amp;#039;s possible to merge several para</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 05:41:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87919</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: merging Parallel indexes (can indexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize be used?)</title>
<description>Yeah passing in ParallelReader should work. I&amp;#039;ll try that thanks! Probably still going to look into this low-level stuff though. Also because some in</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 05:40:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87918</link>
</item><item>
<title>Free live video streaming of ApacheCon US 2009</title>
<description>Team, For those Lucene fanatics not in Oakland this week for ApacheCon US, don&amp;#039;t miss the FREE live video streaming, starting today:  http://stream</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 05:25:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87917</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: merging Parallel indexes (can indexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize be used?)</title>
<description>Hello Geert-Jan, it&amp;#039;s possible to merge several parallel physical indexes (viewed as one logical index with a ParallelReader). Just use the method I</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 05:24:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87916</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: merging Parallel indexes (can indexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize be used?)</title>
<description>Roughly, your approach sounds correct. You essentially need to concatenate tis, tii, frq, prx, but adjusting all absolute pointers accordingly. If y</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 04:43:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87915</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: merging Parallel indexes (can indexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize be used?)</title>
<description>Thanks, but it&amp;#039;s already guaranteed that the indexes are in sync. So I could (and do) use parallelReader to search them both at the sime time. This is</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 03:46:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87911</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: void touchFile() should return the boolean result of the setLastModified</title>
<description>I agree it&amp;#039;s not great that touchFile swallows the return status from File.setLastModified, but, technically changing it would break our jar drop-in b</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 02:08:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87909</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rewrite()ing BooleanQuery results in empty clauses</title>
<description>For 2.9, I believe there&amp;#039;s hardly any runtime cost to the embedded BooleanQuery instances that have no clauses -- when the scorer method is invoked, i</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 02:04:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87908</link>
</item><item>
<title>rewrite()ing BooleanQuery results in empty clauses</title>
<description>I am rewriting some BooleanQueries and the end result contains some empty queries. The initial query is of the form: Field1:foo* Field2:foo* Field3:f</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 00:28:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87904</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Facets</title>
<description>If the query is a very selective one, you can go through the XML document and do the counting. If the query is not so selective, which is usually th</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 17:49:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87893</link>
</item><item>
<title>void touchFile() should return the boolean result of the setLastModified</title>
<description>This is an issue found by Findbugs. In the file FSDirectory the method void touchFile() should return the boolean result of the setLastModified method</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 17:05:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87892</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: clucene user</title>
<description>: Am working with clucene.Kindly tell the forum to find my solution a web search for &amp;quot;clucene forum&amp;quot; turns up this as the top result... http://sourc</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 16:37:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87891</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ComplexPhraseQueryParser highlight problem</title>
<description>AHMET ARSLAN wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Looks like its because the query &amp;gt;&amp;gt; coming in is a ComplexPhraseQuery and &amp;gt;&amp;gt; the Highlighter doesn&amp;#039;t current know how to handle</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 14:36:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87889</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ComplexPhraseQueryParser highlight problem</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Looks like its because the query &amp;gt; coming in is a ComplexPhraseQuery and &amp;gt; the Highlighter doesn&amp;#039;t current know how to handle that &amp;gt; type. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; It w</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 14:15:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87884</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: merging Parallel indexes (can indexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize be used?)</title>
<description>addIndexesNoOptimize is only for shards. But this [pending patch/contribution] is similar what you&amp;#039;re seeking, I think:  https://issues.apache.org/</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 11:59:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87876</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Facets</title>
<description>If you need faceting on top of Lucene and you&amp;#039;re not using Solr, Bobo-browse ( http://bobo-browse.googlecode.com ) is a high-performance open source f</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 11:07:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87875</link>
</item><item>
<title>merging Parallel indexes (can indexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize be used?)</title>
<description>Given two parallel indexes which contain the same products but different fields, one with slowly changing fields and one with fields which are updated</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 10:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87874</link>
</item><item>
<title>merging Parallel indexes (can indexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize be used?)</title>
<description>Given two parallel indexes which contain the same products but different fields, one with slowly changing fields and one with fields which are updated</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 09:44:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87870</link>
</item><item>
<title>merging Parallel indexes (can indexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize be used?)</title>
<description>Given two parallel indexes one with slowly changing fields and one with fields which are updated regularly. Is it possible to periodically merge thes</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 08:24:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87869</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Index files not deleted after optimization</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Ganesh &amp;lt;emailgane@yahoo.co.in&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; My IndexReader and Searcher is open all the time. I am reopening it at constan</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 07:35:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87868</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Index files not deleted after optimization</title>
<description>My IndexReader and Searcher is open all the time. I am reopening it at constant interval. Below are the code sequence. 1. DB optimize 2. Close write</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 06:45:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87867</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Facets</title>
<description>On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 10:23 +0100, Henrik Hjalmarsson wrote: &amp;gt; I have gotten a demand for an API method that returns an XML response, &amp;gt; listing all th</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 05:42:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87864</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: UpdateDocument failed</title>
<description>In my experience the most frequent cause is not getting an exact match on terms. Are you sure that you have an exact match i.e. you&amp;#039;re not analyzing</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 03:54:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87859</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How do you map a query for fieldx to fieldy</title>
<description>Paul Taylor wrote: &amp;gt; For backwards compatabiity I have to change queries for the track &amp;gt; field to the recording field. I did this by overriding  &amp;gt; Q</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 03:54:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87858</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: UpdateDocument failed</title>
<description>Any leads in this issue would be greatly helpful. My logs shows me the updateDocument call was successful but the status of the document was not upda</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 03:38:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87857</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: one to many relationship</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Could anyone comment on how should I handle one-to-many relationship of &amp;gt; domain objects in lucene? I have been searching the archive but was unable</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 03:03:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87856</link>
</item><item>
<title>one to many relationship</title>
<description>Hi, Could anyone comment on how should I handle one-to-many relationship of domain objects in lucene? I have been searching the archive but was unabl</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 02:44:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87855</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: deleteDocuments() does not work</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Dinh &amp;lt;pcdinh@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Michael, &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Does that mean you no longer see the original problem (changes not &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 02:34:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87854</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: deleteDocuments() does not work</title>
<description>Hi Michael, &amp;gt; Does that mean you no longer see the original problem (changes not &amp;gt; being reflected)? Yes. The deleted documents do not appear in sea</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 02:21:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87853</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Index files not deleted after optimization</title>
<description>It depends on the relative timing. If the old IndexReader is still open when the optimize completes then the files it has open cannot be deleted. Bu</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 01:52:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87847</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: deleteDocuments() does not work</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Dinh &amp;lt;pcdinh@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Michael, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Thank a lot for your advice &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Can you verify you are in fact reope</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 01:50:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87846</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Facets</title>
<description>Well, lucene is blazingly quick and sometimes things take less time than one might expect, but your combination of large and very large is not encoura</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 01:43:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87845</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: deleteDocuments() does not work</title>
<description>Hi Michael, Thank a lot for your advice &amp;gt; Can you verify you are in fact reopening the reader that&amp;#039;s reading the &amp;gt; same Directory the writer is writ</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 01:24:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87843</link>
</item><item>
<title>Facets</title>
<description>Hello  I am trying to develop an API for a search application that is using Lucene 2.4.1 The search application is maintained by RAA (swedish goverme</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 01:23:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87844</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Index files not deleted after optimization</title>
<description>I am reopening the reader and closing the old one. I am not facing this issue in Linux otherwise Linux will show &amp;lt;filename&amp;gt;(deleted) under /proc/pid/f</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 01:17:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87842</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: indexing xml messages</title>
<description>StandardAnalyzer will, amongst other things, convert everything to lowercase which means that term queries on mixed or upper case text will fail to ma</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 01:08:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87841</link>
</item><item>
<title>indexing xml messages</title>
<description>Hi, the following junit test fails on 3 out of the 6 searches:   @Test   public void indexXML() throws Exception {     Analyzer analyzer = ne</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 23:40:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87837</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ComplexPhraseQueryParser highlight problem</title>
<description>Looks like its because the query coming in is a ComplexPhraseQuery and the Highlighter doesn&amp;#039;t current know how to handle that type. It would need to</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 16:42:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87835</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ComplexPhraseQueryParser highlight problem</title>
<description>I think there is a problem about attachment. I am re-sending it. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Thank you for your interest, Mark. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I am sending a java code (using lucene</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 16:21:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/87834</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
