jira at apache
Nov 18, 2009, 2:10 PM
Post #1 of 1
(106 views)
Permalink
|
|
[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2081) CartesianShapeFilter improvements
|
|
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779690#action_12779690 ]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2081:
-----------------------------------------
IMO we should start a refactoring beginning with Shape and CartesianPolyFilterBuilder.
This needs Documentation, cleanup and optimization. The Shape List<Double> member bugs me in particular - we could save a lot of object creations when we could change this to an array of doubles where Shapes and their arrays could be reused somehow.
I have reserved some time to work on spatial in Dec. CartesianPolyFilterBuilder is the place to start from my point of view.
> CartesianShapeFilter improvements
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2081
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2081
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib/spatial
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
>
> The CartesiahShapeFilter could use some improvements. For starters, if we make sure the boxIds are sorted in index order, this should reduce the cost of seeks. I think we should also replace the logging with a similar approach to Lucene's output stream. We also can do Term creation a tad bit more efficiently too.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe [at] lucene
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help [at] lucene
|
