jira at apache
May 6, 2012, 11:57 AM
Post #1 of 1
(43 views)
Permalink
|
|
[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4034) improve functionquery tests, fix some minor bugs
|
|
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-4034.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
I committed this... if anyone has any comments (especially regarding omitTF, it seemed to me e.g. tf() should be consistent with what termquery does), let me know.
> improve functionquery tests, fix some minor bugs
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4034
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4034
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4034.patch
>
>
> Currently functionqueries have basically no simple low-level tests.
> Found a few minor problems:
> * fix -1 summation (in case some, but not all segments are preflex): TotalTermFreq/SumTotalTermFreq
> * fix omitTF case (due to LUCENE-2929, docsenum will return null if you ask for freqs but the field is omitTF).
> * fix some indexedField vs field mixups
> * fix QueryUtils searcher-wrapping to also set the similarity the same as it was on the original searcher.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe [at] lucene
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help [at] lucene
|
