Login | Register For Free | Help	Search this list this category for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Lucene: Java-Dev [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging   Index | Next | Previous | View Flat

jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 7:17 AM Views: 141 Permalink [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260595#comment-13260595 ] Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-3405: ---------------------------------------- What you did is perfect in every way if you *want* to publish the JAR so that API-style users get the benefit, but it's a lot of work if all you want it to put a patch into a war or an assembly. How does the following alternative strike you? WAR FILES: Some script (probably in ant): 1. Grab and patch patch the source (not changing the package) and builds a jar for each patched item. 2. The results are assembled into a 'sparse war file' (just containing WEB-INF/lib/all-them-jars). 3. mvn install:install-file (or the maven ant tools) push the results to the local repository. 4. the pom for the war file lists the results as an 'overlay'. It seems to me that the WAR file is the whole show here, since all the patched binaries go inside the war? If that's no so, let me know. > maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-3405 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Task > Components: Build > Reporter: Robert Muir > Fix For: 4.0 > > > Lets take the commons-csv scenario: > * apache-solr-3.5.0 binary distribution contains no actual commons-csv.jar anywhere, > in fact it contains no third party jars (the stuff present in solr/lib) at all. > * binary distribution contains only the jars necessary for *solrj* and *contrib plugins*, and a solr.war > I think the maven artifacts should match whats in the binary release (no third party jars > inside the .war are "exposed", we just publish the .war itself). This exposes a lot less surface area. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe [at] lucene For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help [at] lucene

Subject User Time [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 7:17 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 7:19 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 7:21 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 7:23 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 7:25 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 7:27 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 7:37 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 8:41 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 9:37 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 9:43 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 10:11 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 10:19 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 10:53 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 10:59 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 11:27 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 11:49 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 11:53 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 11:57 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:01 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:01 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:09 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:09 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:11 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:21 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:27 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:27 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:37 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:43 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:51 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 12:59 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 1:03 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 2:04 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 2:10 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 2:24 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 2:26 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 2:34 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 2:34 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 4:02 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 4:08 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 4:24 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 24, 2012, 7:04 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 12:13 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 6:52 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 6:56 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 7:00 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 7:06 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 7:10 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 7:14 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 7:20 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 7:26 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 7:28 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 7:32 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 7:38 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 7:54 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 25, 2012, 10:46 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 7:50 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 8:14 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 8:38 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 8:40 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 8:44 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 9:34 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 9:58 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 10:02 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 10:04 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 10:08 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 10:22 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 10:26 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 10:34 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 10:38 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 11:20 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 12:05 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 1:34 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 1:38 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 1:40 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 1:48 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 3:14 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 3:24 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 3:30 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 3:36 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 3:36 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 3:56 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 4:00 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 8:05 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 10:00 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 26, 2012, 11:34 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 27, 2012, 10:56 AM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 27, 2012, 12:04 PM     [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging jira at apache Apr 27, 2012, 3:04 PM

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat   Lucene     General     Java-User     Java-Dev     c-dev     ruby-dev

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 

Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.