Lucene | Java-Dev Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 08 Nov 2009 10:22:36 -0800 120 Gossamer Threads | Lucene | Java-Dev 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2012) Add @Override annotations [ [url]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=127747 08 Nov 2009 09:47:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/88201 [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2045) FNFE hit when creating an empty index and infoStream is on [ [url]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updat 08 Nov 2009 09:47:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/88202 Re: A report for "Not so important (but still is a) bug" I sure hope not :) I hope 3.0 is out soonish... But just in case, I've reopened & marked fix version 2.9.2, so if we ever do a 2.9.2 that'll remind 08 Nov 2009 09:46:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/88200 [jira] Reopened: (LUCENE-2045) FNFE hit when creating an empty index and infoStream is on [ [url]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reope 08 Nov 2009 09:45:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/88199 Re: AW: Hudson build is back to normal: Lucene-trunk #1002 On Nov 8, 2009, at 5:10, "Uwe Schindler" <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Juhu! Heavy commiting made it at least. I am back in Bremen now. It > was a ple 08 Nov 2009 09:15:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/88198 [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2012) Add @Override annotations [ [url]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=127747 08 Nov 2009 09:06:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/88197 Re: A report for "Not so important (but still is a) bug" dude, will we have 2.9.2? :) simon On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > We should fix this; I'll 08 Nov 2009 08:18:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/88194 Re: Omit positions but not TF Michael McCandless wrote: > +1 > > I guess we'd add a Fieldable.setOmitPositions? And then save that in > FieldInfos, and fix the postings writing/r 08 Nov 2009 08:14:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/88193 [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing [ [url]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=127747 08 Nov 2009 08:04:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/88192 [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing [ [url]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=127747 08 Nov 2009 07:58:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/88191