Mailing List Archive: Lucene: General

[VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

gsingers at apache

Oct 26, 2009, 3:15 PM

Post #1 of 12 (1353 views)
Permalink

[VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0

Tis the season for releases...

Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
(note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released)

CHANGES are spelled out at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt

Thanks,
Grant

yonik at lucidimagination

Oct 26, 2009, 3:35 PM

Post #2 of 12 (1307 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0 [In reply to]

Hmmm, weren't you going to update the version numbers to 1.4.1-dev
like we just discussed in the other thread?
That way if someone changes some of the solr source from the download
and recompiles, they don't get a version number of 1.4.0

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers [at] apache> wrote:
> Tis the season for releases...
>
> Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at
> http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and
> solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released)
>
> CHANGES are spelled out at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt
>
> Thanks,
> Grant
>

gsingers at apache

Oct 26, 2009, 3:57 PM

Post #3 of 12 (1307 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0 [In reply to]

Yes.

I need to update the POMs too, so scratch this vote for a little bit.

On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:

> Hmmm, weren't you going to update the version numbers to 1.4.1-dev
> like we just discussed in the other thread?
> That way if someone changes some of the solr source from the download
> and recompiles, they don't get a version number of 1.4.0
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll
> <gsingers [at] apache> wrote:
>> Tis the season for releases...
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at
>> http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and
>> solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released)
>>
>> CHANGES are spelled out at
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Grant
>>

gsingers at apache

Oct 26, 2009, 6:58 PM

Post #4 of 12 (1304 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0 [In reply to]

OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.

On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:

> Tis the season for releases...
>
> Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
> (note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released)
>
> CHANGES are spelled out at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt
>
> Thanks,
> Grant

yonik at lucidimagination

Oct 26, 2009, 7:14 PM

Post #5 of 12 (1304 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0 [In reply to]

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers [at] apache> wrote:
> OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.

I'm seeing emptiness at
http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

> On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> Tis the season for releases...
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at
>> http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and
>> solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released)
>>
>> CHANGES are spelled out at
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Grant
>
>
>

gsingers at apache

Oct 27, 2009, 3:22 AM

Post #6 of 12 (1292 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0 [In reply to]

I'm feeling emptiness, too. Looks like I forgot the public_html part
when copying. All is restored now.

On Oct 26, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll
> <gsingers [at] apache> wrote:
>> OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.
>
> I'm seeing emptiness at
> http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>> On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>
>>> Tis the season for releases...
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at
>>> http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and
>>> solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released)
>>>
>>> CHANGES are spelled out at
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Grant
>>
>>
>>

yonik at lucidimagination

Oct 29, 2009, 5:40 AM

Post #7 of 12 (1285 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0 [In reply to]

So what we feared has come to pass - Lucene found more bugs and is
going to restart the release.
The bugs found however, don't affect Solr... so I think we should just
continue with our vote.

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers [at] apache> wrote:
> Tis the season for releases...
>
> Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at
> http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and
> solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released)
>
> CHANGES are spelled out at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt
>
> Thanks,
> Grant
>

uwe at thetaphi

Oct 29, 2009, 5:49 AM

Post #8 of 12 (1290 views)
Permalink

RE: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0 [In reply to]

Yes, it's too bad!

But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing?
Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1 in the
package that are not the officially released 2.9.1 artifacts.

Uwe

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe [at] thetaphi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: yseeley [at] gmail [mailto:yseeley [at] gmail] On Behalf Of Yonik
> Seeley
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 1:40 PM
> To: general [at] lucene
> Cc: solr-dev [at] lucene
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
>
> So what we feared has come to pass - Lucene found more bugs and is
> going to restart the release.
> The bugs found however, don't affect Solr... so I think we should just
> continue with our vote.
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers [at] apache>
> wrote:
> > Tis the season for releases...
> >
> > Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at
> > http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and
> > solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released)
> >
> > CHANGES are spelled out at
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-
> 1.4/CHANGES.txt
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Grant
> >

yonik at lucidimagination

Oct 29, 2009, 5:52 AM

Post #9 of 12 (1292 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0 [In reply to]

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe [at] thetaphi> wrote:
> Yes, it's too bad!
>
> But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing?
> Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1 in the
> package that are not the officially released 2.9.1 artifacts.

Darn... forgot about the version number in the jars.
Sigh.

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

gsingers at apache

Oct 29, 2009, 5:59 AM

Post #10 of 12 (1287 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0 [In reply to]

Yeah, unfortunately, I think we need to use the new Jars.

On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe [at] thetaphi>
> wrote:
>> Yes, it's too bad!
>>
>> But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before
>> releasing?
>> Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1
>> in the
>> package that are not the officially released 2.9.1 artifacts.
>
> Darn... forgot about the version number in the jars.
> Sigh.
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com

bill.w.au at gmail

Oct 29, 2009, 6:07 AM

Post #11 of 12 (1294 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0 [In reply to]

I think someone has already pointed this out before. On numerous occasions
I have had to dig into the Lucene code when writing code to extend Solr. So
it will be much earier to make sure that I am looking at the right code if
Solr uses an official release of Lucene, as opposed to a particular SVN
revision.

Bill

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers [at] apache>wrote:

> Yeah, unfortunately, I think we need to use the new Jars.
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe [at] thetaphi> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, it's too bad!
>>>
>>> But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing?
>>> Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1 in the
>>> package that are not the officially released 2.9.1 artifacts.
>>>
>>
>> Darn... forgot about the version number in the jars.
>> Sigh.
>>
>> -Yonik
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>
>
>

yonik at lucidimagination

Oct 29, 2009, 6:11 AM

Post #12 of 12 (1287 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0 [In reply to]

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Bill Au <bill.w.au [at] gmail> wrote:
> I think someone has already pointed this out before. On numerous occasions
> I have had to dig into the Lucene code when writing code to extend Solr. So
> it will be much earier to make sure that I am looking at the right code if
> Solr uses an official release of Lucene, as opposed to a particular SVN
> revision.

And it's much easier for people to use a Solr release if we could
actually *release* one!!!
But yes, it looks like we will spin a new Solr release.

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

> Bill
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers [at] apache>wrote:
>
>> Yeah, unfortunately, I think we need to use the new Jars.
>>
>>
>> On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe [at] thetaphi> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, it's too bad!
>>>>
>>>> But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing?
>>>> Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1 in the
>>>> package that are not the officially released 2.9.1 artifacts.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Darn... forgot about the version number in the jars.
>>> Sigh.
>>>
>>> -Yonik
>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads